Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

I was discussing about reason for Shoaib Malik becoming Captain of Pakistan cricket team. I do not know if the weight behind reasons I was given is good enough (especially regarding Mohammad Yousuf), though reasons I am given do make some sense.

I was told that, without questioning how and why players in the past were chosen in team (merit or shafaish), it was decided that to look for a player from amongst those that are already part of team. Thus, options were considered and choice was made.

After Inzamam retirement, the choices were few. These are the choices. How they were evaluated, and why Shoaib was considered as Captain, a rough guide could be as follow:

Mohammad Yousuf: His physical fitness was in question, but that was not such a big issue, as much as other issues about suitability. Looking at Pakistani mentality (however unfortunate), even though his performance is excellent, his background was not considered as good enough to command that respect in the team, a must to lead a team. He is also considered very soft person and could not force his decision on the team (maybe the result of his background). Thus, his ability as leader was questionable.

Second choice Younis Kham: Management has realised that he is complete idiot. He also has character that does not forget personal enmity and grudges. It is believed that he had some grudge with Inzamam too, and when team needed good batting performance most, he used to become reckless (that could be due to his grudge with the then captain). Thus, even though there was a segment in the management that wanted him at all cost, sense prevailed. It was decided that team could not be given in the hand of such unstable person, full of grudges.

Third Choice Shoaib Akhtar: He has big character and emotional problem. He can go into shell any time and could become aggressive without notice. He could also become reckless and has lot of self ego. It is believed that Shoaib Akhtar being Captain would only make the team disunited and shattered. His temperament was in question and thus he was discarded to take over the team.

Fourth choice Shahid Afridi: Normally city dwellers have cool mind. Well, it was analysed that this player, even though from Karachi and was brought up in Karachi, has typical tribal mental character and mentally very hot. He also has the tendency of getting mentally switched off at any time and could show reckless behaviour and can make reckless and illogical decisions without thinking of consequence. (Aksar Afridi kee deemaghi batti bujh jati hay). So, it was best to not let the team go in such unstable and unpredictable hand.

Fifth choice Abdul Razzak: In opinion of the team management, Abdul Razzak does not have that mental capability to become leader of the team. It was considered that he also does not have that ability to force his decisions on others (team mate). He could become aggressive at one time and passive at other, both phase lasting too long and he does not have that ability to adapt from one phase to another quickly. Thus, it was decided that it is best not to give him that responsibility of Captaincy.

Sixth choice was Shoaib Malik. He is considered to have balanced mind and ability to lead. He is adoptable and friendly. He has good relation with most team members. Even though his batting need to get polished and does not demand automatic place in test team (his ODI performance is good enough), with no other choice as all other choices had serious drawbacks, it was decided to give him that responsibility and see how things goes on.

I do not know how many would agree with these explanations, but that is what I am told and it seems reasonable explanations.

[Though I still have some reservation on reason for Mohammad Yousuf not given the responsibility, I may be wrong, as from all observations, one can see how much Pakistani as nation has that phobia of human background, preferences on basis of nepotism, and tribal loyalty above merit].

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Allow me to give the Geico Caveman's Response:

Ahhhhhhh, yeah, WHAT?

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

i think shoaib akhtar or even afridi wud have been good choices....
but malik is the best choice cuz none of the other two i mention r permanent members of the squad....
as long as yusuf has that long beard u can forget that he'd get a nod from the musharraf-controlled pcb....

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Saleem sahib give it a rest. You would go to any length to prove that you are right and everyone else is wrong. OK so Shoaib is 6th choice, does it matter even if he was the 20th choice. He is the captain now. Get over it and move on. Boy some people go into a long sulk.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

And the point for this thread? :rolleyes:

Oh …I see…PCB forgot to consult with your captaincy selection manual when they made the decision…Got it!! :ahaa:

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Bhai, I just wrote what I was told by someone (who is close enough with people in Pakistan cricket management). I do not know what he told me is his opinion or management’s opinion. Still that is what I am told when discussing the matter. I did not claim what I wrote is what I believe. Phir bhie, I am surprised that you got so upset? :D

Na manoo .. I am not forcing anyone anyhow :). If you want that I do not post anything on KK just because it upset someone, tell me. That’s all :D

Yahaan ajeeb chakkar hay. Kuch justify karo tou buray or justification ko question karo tou buray :)

Now I have started feeling that if I would write that Shoaib Malik is the best choice, even those supporting the decision of Sh Mk captaincy, many would come shouting that, what I have written is blasphemy :)

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

So what is your point? Do you agree with them or not? Sounds like you are confused.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^Bhai choro. I do not find KK a decent place to make comments, put facts, or give opinions. If anyone dares to do that here, one can get exposed to personal attacks and abuses.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

I ask you to provide evidence via searching the forum and giving us an example of where some one other than yourself presented facts but his arguments and facts were thrown out the door.
I myself had started threads when I was new to Cricketnama and arguments went on endlessly but never did I feel that ppl were not hearing me out. I guess when you present thoughts that are coherent and backed with real logic then you will get suitable support.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^I never complained if people agree with what I wrote or not. I do not even care about what people think. I do recognise that different people have different opinions that could be for whatever reason (facts they understand differently, bias, nepotism, etc). Problem is not that people agree with what I wrote or did not.

Problem is that people did not kept quite or argued decently, they started calling names, abusing and accusing. This is the character of the people that I found here.

Anyhow, forget it all. Who cares?

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^ seems like you do.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

thanks for sharing your views and for the insider news, tho i find it hard to believe that Shoaib Malik was 6th in line

and unfortunately i have noticed you have copped some unnecessary flak from some members

thanks for the life story

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Brother, there is reason for Shoaib Malik being sixth on the list. Read this article on Pakistan player’s contract made in June 2006.

Thus, when choosing player for Captain’s appointment, if those in ‘Category A’ were considered before going for ‘Category B’ player, isn’t it natural?

If you are working in a company and you are in ‘Category A’ list, then if manager place gets vacant, what would you consider right and expect? You get the job or those that are working in the company ‘Category B’ list, getting less money then you, becomes manager?

Pakistan ‘Category A’ players retention fees was also higher then ‘Category B’ players. Here is the list of Pakistan players with Category:

Category A - Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf, Abdul Razzaq, Shoaib Akhtar, Younis Khan, Shahid Afridi

Category B - Mohammad Sami, Shoaib Malik, Danish Kaneria, Kamran Akmal

Category C - Asim Kamal, Imran Farhat, Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, Shahid Nazir, Salman Butt, Bazid Khan, Umar Gul, Rao Iftikhar Anjum, Mohammad Asif, Faisal Iqba

http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/251723.html
**
New central contracts scheme announced:**
Performance-related incentives for players
Cricinfo staff
June 28, 2006

Pakistan’s top players will earn at least Rs 3 million (US$ 49,000) a year in the new central contracts scheme announced by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB). In addition, the board revealed details of the financial performance-related incentives on offer for individual players and the team.

The PCB had already confirmed a basic 25% pay rise in central contracts last week - players in the top tier now earn Rs 250,000 (US$ 4,100) per month; in the tier below them players earn Rs 156,250 (US$ 2,600)and players in the bottom tier Rs 93,750 (US$ 1,500) per month. There has been no movement between tiers for players this year and the categorisation of players remain as it was last year.

Additionally, for every Test century scored, the player will receive Rs 100,000 (US$ 1,600) as well as a number of points which will eventually help him to move up a tier. A knock of 150 will earn the player Rs 150,000 (US$ 2,500) and similar rewards will be given to bowlers who take five wickets in an innings or ten in a match.

And if this weren’t enough, bonuses are on offer for wins in each of the bilateral series Pakistan play in this year, against England, West Indies and South Africa. Further, if Pakistan reach the semi-finals of the Champions Trophy, each member of the squad will receive Rs 100,000. If they reach the final, it will be double that figure; should they win, each Pakistan player stands to earn Rs 500,000 (US$ 8,300). The amounts will be doubled for similar performances in the World Cup, though if Pakistan win that, the PCB says there is no limit on the bonus amount.

Thankfully, it isn’t only players in the national squad who are benefiting from the PCB’s cash windfalls from the last couple of years. Shabbir Ahmed, suspended for a year from international cricket for having an illegal bowling action, did not find himself on the list of contracted players, but he is currently receiving Rs 30,000 (US$ 500) a month and will be considered for a six-month contract if he comes back in December with a rectified action.

A number of retainer contracts are also likely to be announced in the next few days, specifically for younger players who are about to make a mark in international cricket. Though these players are not necessarily the next best set of players, they will be chosen from an Under-19 group who are likely to be in and around the Pakistan set-up in coming years. Reserve players on the England tour will also be paid a monthly salary, even if they do not play.

Finally, the PCB’s ad-hoc committee has also decided to set up a benefit fund for ex-Test players, similar to a pensions scheme for all players who have played Test cricket for Pakistan. The details of this scheme have not been finalised yet.
**
Category A** - Inzamam-ul-Haq, Mohammad Yousuf, Abdul Razzaq, Shoaib Akhtar, Younis Khan, Shahid Afridi
**
Category B** - Mohammad Sami, Shoaib Malik, Danish Kaneria, Kamran Akmal
**
Category C** - Asim Kamal, Imran Farhat, Rana Naved-ul-Hasan, Shahid Nazir, Salman Butt, Bazid Khan, Umar Gul, Rao Iftikhar Anjum, Mohammad Asif, Faisal Iqbal

**
Regarding player contract and retention fee:**

http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/250997.html

New central contracts
Pakistan’s players receive 25% pay rise
Cricinfo staff
June 21, 2006

Pakistan’s top players have been given 25% pay rises as well as the lure of cash incentives for wins in the series they play this year as well as the World Cup next year. The PCB announced renewed central contracts for 20 players and the board’s chairman, Shaharyar Khan told reporters in Lahore on Wednesday that the cash incentives had been introduced as part of the discussions with the players.

“These cash incentives are nothing new to Pakistan cricket,” said Shaharyar. “We have been giving awards after each series or match win. The only difference is that now we have made it part of the contract. We have awarded central contracts to 20 players with a 25% rise as demanded and mutually agreed with the players.”

Pakistan players, led by captain Inzamam-ul Haq, last month demanded a pay rise and performance-related bonuses for next year’s World Cup., wishes it appears that have now been granted.

** Centrally-contracted players are divided into three pay scales depending on seniority and experience.** From last year’s contracts, players in the top bracket - Inzamam, Shoaib Akhtar, Younis Khan, Mohammad Yousuf, Abdul Razzaq and Shahid Afridi - were on a monthly retainer of US$3750. Players in the bracket below - including the likes of Mohammad Sami, Danish Kaneria, Shoaib Malik and Kamran Akmal - received US$2500 a month while players in the bottom rung were paid US$1250 a month. These amounts will all increase by 25%.

Additionally, the incentives mean that for every win in a Test or one-day international against England, West Indies (at home) and South Africa (away series) each player will be paid US$ 3,333.

On top of that,each series win against England, West Indies or South Africa will help the players pocket a further US$8,333.33.

For this October’s ICC Champions Trophy in India, each player is promised US$ 1,666.66 if the team reaches the semifinals and US$3,666.66 if it qualifies for the final. Winning the competition will earn each player US$ 8,333.33.

Though there was speculation that Shoaib Akhtar might not be included in the contracts list due to a spate of injuries that has kept him out for much of this year, he was retained in the top group of players. Yasir Hameed and Arshad Khan, however, were not so lucky and their contracts have not been renewed from last year. The total number of players awarded contracts has also been cut from 23 to 20,with the savings from those cuts, says the PCB, going towards the increments.

Shabbir Ahmed, currently serving a one-year ban from the ICC for a faulty action, has also not been awarded a contract though the PCB is arranging a special package of benefits for him till he returns

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^ The other day in another thread based on another set of facts Hasan Raza was better suited to become captain in place of Malik. Now he is not even in the above list, so where does your argument stand.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^i see what you mean
so they all were considered but i dont think they were ever a choice, i think younis and malik were the only 2 choices

and if you want to use the company analogy, players like akhtar and afridi would be fired a long time ago :D

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Nasim Ashraf is yet to explain to him about Hasan Raza.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

I doubt if you read my post carefully. If you will read that post in that other thread carefully, you will understand. I was not saying that Hasan Raza was in for Captaincy. I wrote in that thread that if merit was criteria, Hasan Raza with average of over 50 in first class cricket would have been given much more chances in test as batsman then players like Shoaib Malik as batsman with average of 25.

On question that what do I think? If Hasran Raza deserve Captaincy more then Shoaib Malik, I said that Yes, I believe so. But that certainly do not mean neither I believe that when Management did not even gave Hasan Raza enough chance to play Test cricket, how can they give him Captaincy. Regardless of the reason, he has not proved his capability in test cricket yet. But then no one can prove their capability if they are not given enough chances.

Anyhow, please forget it all... I am wrong, OK :)

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

^ I read your post carefully as you yourself admitted in the second paragraph that based on those stats you thought that Hasan Raza deserved captaincy more than Malik. Now for someone who throws around stats and contracts to prove his points surely Hasan missing from the above list blows a few holes in your theory.

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

Sa1eeem...

Dont go back on the Hasan Raza thing...you showed a poor argument by quoting first class averages only...a poor indicator if ever there was one...you still havent told me...is Iftikhar Anjum who has a better first class bowling average than Shoiab Akhtar better than Shoiab Akhtar?...

Atleast if you qupted test stats then people could have taken you more seriously but you chose the stats which suited your flawed arguments...

Dont make excuses of name calling when infact you had no leg to stand on...

Re: Why Shoaib Malik was chosen as Captain.

I think the most senior player should be offered the captaincy...think about why he becomes a senior player...

The captain and vice captain should be appointed for a single series or for a single trip...if he perform well then he should be appointed for the next series/trip...or make place for someone else...

PS: PCB is a bunch of idiots...they should restrict themselves to administrative work only...and leave all the cricketing performaces to the national coach...like selection of players...appointing the captain and vice captain from the squad he selected for a certain series/trip...and choosing his assistants...like bowling...batting...fielding...discipline...health and diet etc...