Please read carefully, and everything would become clear …
Please comment: … And yea (all PMLN Zombies), do not get upset, because I am not one of those 3 SC judges. What I wrote is what I concluded. You may have different opinion, but what i wrote is also one sensible (and most likely) conclusion. ![]()
Panama papers came out (open for observation of public): 3 April 2016,
NS name was revealed as one of few corrupt world politician holding companies in Panama and using those companies, own 4 flats in park-land Mayfair London.
Imran Khan on behalf of ‘Nation’, took the case to SC … claimed that NS is haramkhor, who bought revealed flats (4 Mayfair flats) from corruption (looted) money belonging to Pakistan tax payer … or by harming Pakistan.
SC is not trial court … but SC is constitutional court. Hence case was filed as constitutional case … that is to get NS disqualified from Parliament (not as NAB case).
As constitutional court, SC can hold trial of parliamentarians on constitutional issue (for instance, on violation of constitutional laws) , and SC can also disqualify a parliamentarian (that SC has done with many parliamentarians in past .. especially during Iftikhar Chaudhary time).
Thus, case started on 1st November 2016 in front of bench consisting of 5 Judges, who started hearing the case, on daily basis.
Court asked NS to justify ownership of flats through honest means. … But NS and his lawyers not only did not justified the means but started making stories of Touta-Maina in SC, ignoring what SC was asking, clearly bringing out money trial … or legal funds used to acquire respective flats in Mayfair (held in the companies registered in PANAMA) … Unfortunately, other than Touta-Maina kee kahani, NS could produce money trial, rather, kept evading the question.
After around 4 months (on 23 Feb) 2 judges concluded with verdict and 3 judges held the verdict, thus partial judgement was made after the hearing (it was not split judgement, but it was partial judgement)
What happened:
2 judges gave final clear verdict:
Judge 1: Asif Saeed Khan Khosa …. Disqualified NS from holding any public office.
Judge 2: Gulzar Ahmed … Disqualified NS from holding any public office.
Anyhow, 3 judges abstained from final verdict … differed their verdict to be given after further investigation. These 3 judges were:
Judge 3: Ejaz Afzal Khan
Judge 4: Sh. Azmat Saeed
Judge 5: Ijaz-ul-Ahsan
They did not gave final verdict even though they also agreed with above 2 judges.
What these 3 judges concluded that … if NS and his family could not come clean in SC hearings (in front of 5 judges) … still, NS and his family should be given another chance to come clean, in secret hearings (hearing of JIT). Thus JIT was formed.
JIT was golden opportunity for NS and his family, that, if they were shy in open hearing of SC, they could come out of their shell and clear themselves in from of JIT, giving all relevant information, convincing JIT that acquiring those flats were from legal money and not corruption money.
Further, these 3 judges also gave permission to JIT that facing no cooperation by NS and his family, they could also do some of their own investigation and also find the truth behind documents NS and his family submitted to court and do work on their stories… to find truth behind all the statements NS and his family made to masses. Judges thought that all these information would help in their judgement (final verdict … if it has to be different from 2 judges who already convicted and disqualified NS from public offices).
Even though, one can think that judgement of these 3 judges were either their weakness in judgement or leniency towards NS, whatever the reason of not concluding their final verdict earlier (similar to 2 judges who already gave verdict), there could be another cause too.
Maybe, these three judges were seeing deeper (post-verdict situation), and did not wanted to convict NS without giving him another chance, BUT ALSO, if NS is really Haramkhor than they knew that JIT would make him naked in front of the masses (every Pakistani) before final verdict (ussay, saza sunanay say pahlay, awam kay samnay pura nanga ker diyea jayea).
It is possible that these 3 judges may have thought that if NS would get ‘Nanga’’ in front of the masses, there would be less public reaction (as they probably knew that … PMLN is collection of not only corrupt but notorious thugs, who have deceived people and thus have many Zombies in their party, who could make lot of trouble in distress of disqualification.
Anyhow… it is obvious that after JIT result, three judges have to give clear verdict (else, would be considered incompetent).
Well, well — after JIT result, it became obvious that those 2 judges were right in their conclusive verdict of disqualification … as NS and his family could not come out with single evidence that they acquired the flats using honest money. Rather, JIT found (confirmed) that in earlier hearings of SC, NS and his family of Haramkhors
Lied in SC on oath (did perjury)
Submitted forged papers to SC (did Fraud)
Became guilty of ‘contempt of court’
Influenced state institutions to act illegally, to save themselves and alter their corruption records.
Etc, etc …
Worse is that, NS and his ‘team of retards’ started threatening JIT members and judges hearing his case.
So now these 3 judges have only one choice, that is:
Accept that they were wrong as judgement of senior 2 judges were correct … hence they would disqualify NS from holding public office as dishonest corrupt thug … and would further disqualify all who lied in front of JIT, gave threat, submitted forged documents, etc … from ever holding public posts.
Further, since many new information came out about this family of haramkhor thug, SC would also punish them of Perjury (minimum prison sentence could be 14 years), fraud and especially contempt of court (all their threat to JIT members and SC judges could not be forgiven), influencing national institutions (crime in its own right), etc
Thus, along with disqualification from holding public offices, all NS past cases that were closed (or running) would be sent to NAB for further investigation, trial, and getting this haramkhor family of thugs punished (Darr and his family would get caught punished too).
Exonerating NS after JIT findings is out of question (impossible), because that would mean, these 3 esteemed Judges are incompetent. 2 experience judges have already given verdict after court hearing between Nov 2016 and Feb 2017 … but these 3 Judges could not come with clean verdict after those hearings, rather gave NS another chance (JIT). Unfortunately for NS and his family, NS did not come out with any money trial or any new evidence in front of JIT, rather JIT found made NS position worse than it was before JIT started … so:
If these 3 Judges exonerate NS (impossible), they would become laughing stock, as sensible conclusion is obvious, that is, verdict of those 2 experienced Judges (one of them going to be next CJ of SC) was correct. Actually, exonerating NS would also mean, 2 senior judges who disqualified NS from holding public offices were incorrect. and made their decision wrongly … but those two judges are not only senior and most competent, but soon going to be CJ of SC. Hence, giving any verdict other than disqualification for NS (especially, after JIT) means, these judges would be incompetent in front of whole nation as well as their senior peers.
So … in my sensible opinion, there is no hope for NS left. Verdict would be:
Disqualify NS from NA as dishonest and Haramkhor corrupt thug … along with all his family members (all of them did not cooperated, rather lied in court).
Further, since many new information came out about this haramkhor thug, punish him of Perjury (minimum prison sentnce could be 14 years), fraud and especially contempt of court (all their threat to JIT members and SC judges, plus perjury, submitting forged documents in court, etc. is contempt of court), influencing national institutions (crime in its own right), etc …
Plus opening all cases that was closed … and sending all cases to NAB for further investigation and trial.*