Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
then why did you criticize me for what i said in my post? lol
majority believes that ONLY Hijaab is required and NOT niqaab.
Because you called it an Indian/Pakistani version which is incorrect.
Find out where the majority differs with the minority. Its an interpretation of an ayah and a hadeeth where both differ.
ok, you tell me then what’s Islamic requirement? is covering of face and hands and feet required in Islam?
[/quote]
Kkf bhai, don’t be so sure that niqaab is not required, islamically.Scholars may have different opinions but what was the way of umm ul momeneen and shahabiyaat ra ?
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
Because you called it an Indian/Pakistani version which is incorrect.
Find out where the majority differs with the minority. Its an interpretation of an ayah and a hadeeth where both differ.
well, you have your opinion to which you are entitled...:)
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
Kkf bhai, don't be so sure that niqaab is not required, islamically.Scholars may have different opinions but what was the way of umm ul momeneen and shahabiyaat ra ?
well, as i said you are entitled to your opinion and i am to mine...what i said is what i mean. i'm pretty sure that niqaab is NOT required because Islam does NOT forbid exposing face and hands.
we, in the subcontinent, make things difficult unnecessarily.
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
Its not a matter of opinion over here. Its about facts. You show me how its an indian/pakistani version and I'll believe. Simple as that.
you haven't provided any facts either. :)
i do not have references ready to furnish...!!! i don't have any books to show you.
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
The pardah you are referring isn't the one considered backward.
They are considered equally back ward for not talking to women while not looking at her face, for not sitting with na mehram women and for growing beards.
i have plenty of storys to tell on those mazloom mards. :)
Right, we’ll agree to diagree. And before anyone jumps in saying that while in ahraam women are allowed to uncover face, its permissible when there are no men around, and nowadays it impossible as there are millions of people, men, in haram during umra and hajj.
Besides, men should also always dress up in ahraam in their daily lives as this is dress code required for Allah ka ghar and holy rituals, why follow sattar , in normal circumstances?
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
Hijab or Naqab.... Do you think they confiscate women rights to education and other fields? Whats the basis of this proposition?
Naqab. I'm surprised that you don't know about it 'cuz that's another reason Saudis are critisized.
I'm not supporting hijab or naqab.
But I'd like to know how is naqab an indian/pakistani version ?
Sheikh Abdulaziz ibn baaz (chief mufti of saudi arabia before he passed away) said its naqab which was referred to in the quran.
So was he influenced by Indian/Pakistani cultural pardah ?
Re: Why Purdah is considered as a sign of backwardness?
Right, we'll agree to diagree. And before anyone jumps in saying that while in ahraam women are allowed to uncover face, its permissible when there are no men around, and nowadays it impossible as there are millions of people, men, in haram during umra and hajj.
Besides, men should also always dress up in ahraam in their daily lives as this is dress code required for Allah ka ghar and holy rituals, why follow sattar , in normal circumstances?
Hijab/naqab is an issue where scholars differ. Both have their reasons.