Peace frodo
Hey ... why are you choosing to ignore the other passages of the Bible which show the conflicts?
There are no conflicts.
All people have to do to see which of us is true is to simply undertake a google search for Saul of Tarsus and read up on the Incident at Antioch. I said earlier that the true companions of Jesus (AS) were involved in attempting to get Paul on the straight and narrow they stayed with him in order to influence him.
No, they stayed with him because they AGREED with his doctrines and teachings. They taught with him.
Then you have presented everything from the perspective of Paul ... even then you look at the New Testament he cannot deny all conflicts.
There are no conflicts. Secondly, I gave you the perspective of many of the eyewitnesses who wrote the New Testiment Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter were not Paul. James was the younger 1/2 Brother of Jesus. Same mother, but obviously not the same Father since Jesus's Father was God.
Take a look at some of the apocrypha the ones written by the true companions and see how they make mention of their disagreements.
The apocriphal writings were not actually written by the conpanions or eyewitnesses of Christ which is why they were rejected as scripture.
I'm not saying they didn't agree every now and again, but on major creed issues they disagreed.
Since they were written hundreds of years AFTER the apostles and Jesus walked the earth and NOT by the eyewitnesses, I would expect them to disagree. They aren't scripture, nor are they the word of God like the Biblical books are.
Did you even watch that video I posted? It explains why those books were rejected.
Did you even watch that video I posted? It explains why those books were rejected.