hmm the** title of the thread is merely to catch the eye. *However i am more curious about the fact that there seems to be no attack on a person who was previously severely threatened. simple question dont mistake it for me wishing death on him. **quite beside the point, really.
*
............................................
If you say so ;)
No its not quite besides the point if one reads the whole thread and different comments above.
^ hmm but that is precisely what i wonder when he was the head of state he had attacks, now that he isnt, no more attacks? does make me curious.
lol.. why you want Suicide attacks on him? This really shows what kind a mentality you have, difference of opinion can be understandable but going to this extreme ... classy !
lol.. why you want Suicide attacks on him? This really shows what kind a mentality you have, difference of opinion can be understandable but going to this extreme ... classy !
hmm a bit to charged you are. i am wondering why they havent made any attacks. unless i say they should attack him you cannot claim i am wishing attacks on him. easy to jump to conclusion though.
hmm a bit to charged you are. i am wondering why they havent made any attacks. unless i say they should attack him you cannot claim i am wishing attacks on him. easy to jump to conclusion though.
If you have mentality of what is happening in Pakistan is because of President Musharraf actions,... then your pain is understandable. But unfortuntately not everybody thinks like that.
From the last 60 years, Pakistan face a identity crises, we as a nation haven't figure out what kind a governance system we need. The most important work Musharraf has done is the slogan "Pakistan First" ..... a truly remarkable and enough to forgive him. He was the beacon of light for all classes of Pakistan until 2004 when his popularity was touching 70% .. but yes he did take unpopular actions, but as far as war on terrorism concerned it was right decision, sending of army in tribal region was the right decision too.
Imagine the NWFP today without ARMY, it should be virtually collapsed years ago. Sometime governments have to take unpopular decision for the sake of whole country.... but i am happy a great mindset change is happening in the people of Pakistan after the Nazam-e-Azil, a crucial support for the operations against militants is mounting...
Today when i was talking with dad he used a urdu proverb to describe the fate of Taliban ..
* ....."Jub Ghidaar (donkey) ki moot ati hai, tu woh shaher (city) ka rukh karta hai" ...*
^ chalo diwana you are entitled to draw whatever meaning . i can only speak for myself eh?
Sure you spoke AFTER it was pointed out.
If eye catching was the only reason, there were many many options but you chose what you wanted to.
Nothing to draw any thing from it and nothing to imagine that something was said between the lines.
I will say again the title had bad question and this gave an open ground to yet inhumane and evil thoughts to grow, that someone is curious as to why someone is alive and not dead yet.
Bad intention despite your half attempt to clarify.
^ once again upto to u to draw meaning. i cannot be responsible for your interpretation. my first post was referring to 'nutjobs' guess u missed out on that.
Its not a political thread, or not strictly any way. I wonder with so many attacks at his delicate self why is he now roaming free and happy?arent there nut jobs around hwo want to finish what they started? or more importantly why hasnt there been an attack on zardari zil e ilahi? surely if musharraf deserved one bullet this one deserves 10 :P
This is what you wrote on first post.
Can you defend you are not inhumane and sick-minded who wants to see someone or at least two people dead?
LOL.. I was just thinking about it the other day. All other dictator and other such Pakistani politicians have been mysteriously finished off. Musharaf was really lucky or smart to step off with such grace.
There is nothing wrong with wishing someone, who has taken over your country through wrongful means and used it for his own benefit, dead.
(Machiavelli talks about it in Prince I believe. I can't provide the exact reference.)
Musharaf's crimes are obviously more than just taking over the country. What about the war atrocities in the North, sanctioning the killing of untried, innocent people (families/ civilians) and turning more into extremists?
The only problem is that the punishment would be after the fact but it would still be a lesson against his legacy.
As for prosecution, first let's safeguard our courts from these politicians.
Or turn the other cheek??
I am not advocating any vigilante stuff. Just bringing up a not-so-nice side of the argument.