Please do comment but please read and think before writing something. What I am writing is my own believes and analysis, that I am giving with logical reasons behind my thinking. But that does not mean that all have to agree so do not get agitated. Still since it is very important National issue, I think that we should give our best thoughts on it and think on the subject intelligently, with maturity, patriotism and concern.
I believe that other than misguided innocent Pakistanis mostly from Northern part of Punjab (who are many), only enemy of Pakistan, enemy of Islam, people who do not want harmony amongst Muslims, agents of Jews, hidden members of RAW, and anti-Pakistan western elements are behind Iftikhar.
But then I know that once I will put the facts, there would be many who would try to cover the reality of Iftikhar in shroud by starting to talk about something different like Musharraf, MQM, Shaukat Aziz, Muhajrs, Chaudharies, Presidential election, Steel mill privatisation, Stock market crash, etc. In this way, these people (I would not be surprised that amongst them we might have many of those vested interests I mentioned above) succeed to derail any discussion on Iftikhar’s reality. So, please avoid own frustrations and keep to the subject.
Anyhow, why I believe that Iftikhar is/was working for anti-Pakistan forces?
Because Iftikhar became CJ in June 2005 and once he became CJ, what he did were mostly against Pakistan and fooled people because most in Pakistan are uneducated without any ability to think and thus do not know/understand even basics about judiciary, constitution, laws, economy, governance, politics, or reality of how enemies of country work against a country. These people get fooled easily and today they are getting fooled. Well, even those who are so-called educated, their mental level is so low that most do not like to learn, think, and understand. Even when facts are put in front of them they could not read few lines with concentration, but would start barking without reading, understanding or even thinking.
**Anyhow, let comes to Iftikhar and see how he worked against Pakistan: In cover of Suo-Moto, Iftikhar tried to: **
Destabilise Pakistan’s economy: Many actions of Iftikhar including steel mill issue grinded and harmed Pakistan economy a lot. Surprising thing is that, this crook Iftikhar did not took action where he should have as his action could have improved Pakistan, but he only took action (with wrong judgments) where his actions can only harm Pakistan and Pakistani economy.
For instance, he should have taken action during Sugar crises and should have forced government to bring the Names of people involved on surface and get them punished, but he did not, on the other hand he took action and gave wrong decision on Steel mill privatisation that not only stopped all privatisation process in Pakistan, but stopped FDI and harmed Pakistan economy irreparably.
[If anyone believes that stopping Steel mill privatisation was good for Pakistan, we can argue on that in different thread, as I believe that they do not know anything about privatisation and values of company. For hint: They should look at privatisation of different steel mills all over the world, look at their values and then discuss. For those who think that 6000 acres in port Qasim was worth what these crooks in journalism want us to believe, then they should think logically, check the worth of these lands and think … especially their worth with particular usage conditions attached to those land]
Destabilise Pakistan’s security: By interfering with security institutions of Pakistan, this crook Iftikhar played his role as agents of anti-Pakistan forces by harming the security of Pakistan. His orders of releasing people under detention or forcing and abusing government officials to produce people who were detained in the name of security were all his actions to harm Pakistan’s security. All his actions in this respect, even though seems legal were actually against the security of the country and are un-declared illegal judiciary actions all over the world (something no judiciary in world gets involved).
[People who know many things about Pakistan security are people working in security departments of Pakistan. They are mostly in military or intelligence agencies and work on clandestine information. That is the reason, judiciary of any country do not interfere with actions taken in the name of security. No doubt that in every country (third world, second world or first world), governments and people in security might abuse their privileges of acting with immunity, but nevertheless, if judiciary starts interfering then security of the country gets compromised. Hence, best method of stopping abuses in security institutions are by good governance and not through judiciary. It is government that enact laws and military that protects the country, none of these jobs are done or could be done by judiciary, and thus people have to trust government and military, pray that they do good governance and do not abuse their positions, but country could never allow judiciary to interfere in security matters].
Destabilise Pakistan’s religious harmony: When Musharraf government acted against religious goons who were creating religious disharmony in the country, especially those who were doing that behind the scene without obvious proofs (thus action against them by security people), this crook CJ Iftikhar interfered and started making problems. His interference did not only stopped security apparatus acting against such people on clandestine information, but this crook humiliated many in security departments to discourage them even from acting against such goons (as security people must have realised that state is not there to protect their actions), and thus Iftikhar played his anti-Pakistan role by protecting and spreading religious disharmony in the country.
[It is very important for religious harmony in the country that people in the country not only respect laws, but respect the rights of others and do not interfere with others in the name of religion, their own religious understandings, religious beliefs, religious morality, religious Sectarianisms, personal likes and dislikes, or own moral values. People should be left to decide their own good and bad in their personal life and only preaching with respect and good words between different communities, different sects, different religious believes, or people with different thoughts could be allowed in the country. We have to understand that what we may believe right for ourselves due to religious understandings, Sectarianisms, or personal moral values, may not be right for others, so unless we do not tolerate others and force others to follow my principles, there would be anarchy and disharmony in the country].
Worked against Pakistan government (and undermining the writ of Pakistan Government over Pakistan): Iftikhar actions against government officials for people interned on clandestine proofs by government accused of challenging the writ of Pakistan, challenging Pakistani laws, or because they were working to destabilising Pakistan was steps that Iftikhar took to undermine the writ of Pakistan government over Pakistan.
[It is important for any independent country to have writ of government enforced over the country to make country strong. If government does not impose writ of government over the country then it does not only make the country destabilised but it helps in breaking the country. It is duty of all in government officials to help government impose writ of government in the country. Any official (Judges or whoever) that creates hindrance for government that wants to impose writ of government can be considered as working to make country weak and destabilise the country.
People like Taliban, Lal-Masjid thugs, Tribal in Waziristan, Foreigners living in Pakistan without government permission (Afghans, Arabs or Central Asians), and all who are helping these mentioned people are not only challenging the writ of Pakistan government over Pakistan but are working against Pakistan].
Created disharmony in Pakistan’s politics: A CJ should be non-controversial and impartial. When a judge is perceived as partial towards group of people, any political party, any sect, any ethnicity, then that creates political disharmony in the country. That is one reason judges never get involved with government matters. Iftikhar is not only controversial Judge but perception of his impartiality is well known. Many in Pakistan today consider him partial and believe that he is on payroll of Nawaz.
Iftikhar political partiality as CJ and using his post to destabilise government is obvious from his using suo-moto actions to interfering in everyday running of the government, like traffic jams, prices of tomatoes and banana in market, electricity shortages, etc … as by doing that, he was just making mockery of judiciary and trying to destabilize government and developments in Pakistan.
[In reality, no Judiciary anywhere in the world work to destabilise government and interfere in such things or could interfere in such things, but Iftikhar used suo-moto power to interfere in everything so that he can destabilise government. It is one sign of him being politically impartial. Every person with little intelligence would know that no government could tolerate such people in judiciary.
As for what Iftikhar was doing, it is also fact that anyone with little intelligence would know that no government can control such things straightaway (prices, traffic jams, etc) as it needs revenue, and one have to see improvements in comparison to past (that also not done by judiciary but media with honesty), that is all. Pakistan is a third world country and has to do as much as they can to create revenue than only slowly they can overcome day to day problems (well, even rich countries have problems and need improvements … for instance, M25 in London becomes car park during peak hours where due to traffic jam, car can only cover few miles in hours). It is like, a judge tells a poor person that he should be punished because he is not providing car to his wife and children, without taking account of economical and other problems that surrounds the person (even though it is not job of judge but suppose if a judge does that, it would be ridiculous). Obviously, if any judge would do that then it would be considered as interference and such actions can only destabilise family life of that person even though wife and children might think that judge is doing good (and if that is done with government than similarly such thing would destabilise government even though people might think that judge is doing good)
When judges, especially CJ get involved in politics and their impartiality becomes questionable then that is not only worse for political stability and harmony in the country but could even breaks up a country. This is especially true when perception of CJ impartiality becomes obvious as perception matters a lot in politics. A judge should be seen as impartial whom every person in the country and all political parties can trust, especially this is true for CJ. If any political party or group of people in country do not trust impartiality of CJ then having such judge as CJ can only bring political disharmony in the country that is not good for the unity of the country].
