Re: Why do Pakistanis consider Mahmud Ghazni, Mohammad Ghauri & Aurangzeb Great Musli
[QUOTE]
because he was a tolerant ruler who was liked by his subjects and presided over the most successful period in mughal history....the pinnacle of muslim rule in india.
[/QUOTE]
tolerant towards hindus...........he tried to destroy islam
Akbar wanted to establish an Indian empire by giving greater participation to hindus that ultimately led the downfallof the muslims .
[QUOTE]
your national hero Aurangzeb presided over the downfall of muslim rule and unleashed revolt throughout the nation....he was a failure.
[/QUOTE]
anyone who tries to enforce the sharia to the best of his ability is successful in the eyes of God, regardless of his success in this world
[QUOTE]
DEFENDERS? do you know what "defense" means?
[/QUOTE]
Defense of the faith and to maintain its purity against corrupting influences
.
[QUOTE]
if Muhammad murdered a hundred hindu babies, would you view him in the same light?
[/QUOTE]
Prophet(pbuh) would never order the killing of non-combantents as
it was against the rules of warfare which he strictly abided by
However God at times punishes entire communites somtimes with fire,wind and earthquakes and sometimes by sending armies
Hypothetically speaking IF the Prophet(pbuh) did order such an act then God be praised we will consider it an honor to carry out such a thing.Whatever the Prophet(pbuh) says is it is the duty of a true believer to carry it out
[QUOTE]
The only reason why they are heroes in pakistan is because of antagonism towards Hindus, nothing more, nothing less. that's a pretty pathetic quality of a hero.
[/QUOTE]
not really considering the hostility you have shown to muslims for 1000yrs
[QUOTE]
[QUOTE]
Shivaji is widely-known to have had an excellent human rights record. to anybody in the world,.
[/QUOTE]
any sources for this?
[QUOTE]
the problem in your thinking is that you assume the righteousness of a person is only a matter of which side you are on
[/QUOTE]
Not true I have openly admitted that these rulers were not flawless
But that dosent mean that everything they did was wrong or evil