Re: Why Celebrate Eid Milad Un NAbi s.a.w
[quote]
[quote]
Originally Posted by Sa1eem
For instance, if one gives away half of his wealth on charity to please Allah, or spends all his life in giving education to people free hoping to please Allah, or spends all his life teaching people earning skills again to please Allah, or decides that he/she is going to fast on 1st of January every year to please Allah, etc, etc, etc ... than that is not Bid’ah even though Allah does not demand that (it is not fard), neither Prophet (SAW) recommended that or used to do that (it is not Sunnah), nor anyone in recorded Islamic history of Prophet (SAW) time has done that. In other words, as long as a deed (any deed) is performed without considering (having neyat of considering) that as Fard or Sunnah, than there is no bi’dah in there
[/quote]
on the whole the above statement is poor
firstly bold has been done with the approval of Allah SWT
[/quote]
Poor? Hmmm ... do not try to judge what you could not understand, as poor understanding make everything look poor. :)
[quote]
Bold has been done with the approval of Allah SWT?
[/quote]
Brother ... Joke is ok, but not by associating lies to Allah. You should try to avoid that.
What I know, Allah did not approve or disapprove whatever I wrote above. If you think there is such approval that says:
Give half wealth on charity. Spend all life giving education to people free. Spend all life teaching people skill of earning. Or ... Fast on 1st of January every year.
Than show me those in clear words from Allah, as obviously if Allah has given approval to them, you will find them in Quran as mentioned.
[quote]
and it is these heresay statements that i have a problem with
[/quote]
What heresy statement? I could not see any statement I made is heresy, though people that have heresy mentality would find anything heresy. ... For some, love of Prophet (SAW) is heresy, and if for them it is heresy, then I love to make statements that would seem heresy to them :).
[quote]
DO you or Dont you believe the prophet SAW showed us every form of ibadah? You seem to suggest doing something which the prophet SAW didnt his blessed self do is bettered by what these people can come up with. dont forget this is now one of the biggest events of some peoples calendars.
[/quote]
If we talk about ibadah, as my earlier post says, only fard is Islamic ibadah, that are mentioned in Quran, plus Prophet (SAW) not only told us clearly regarding fards, but also showed us practically all ibadah that is fard and how to perform such ibadah.
As for good deeds that one does for sake of Allah, then that could be considered as Ibadah, and such good deeds varies according to human needs, circumstances, situations, abilities, and thinking.
So no, I do not consider or believe that Prophet (SAW) showed us every form of good deeds. He gave us ‘broad line of guidance’ and within that guidance, any deed that one does with good intention and for sake of Allah, not harming other creations of Allah, then they could be considered as good-deeds or Ibadah.
For instance, suppose a heart surgeon decides to do free heart surgery to whoever could not afford, with intention and hope that Allah would reward him for that. I consider surgeon deed as good deed, a form of ibadah, for which Allah would reward the surgeon.
Anyhow, what about you? Maybe you think that the surgeon is ‘shaitan’ who is doing bi’dah.:) Anyhow, if you consider that surgeon is doing good deed for which Allah would reward him on judgment day, then obviously, that could be considered as Ibadah. Now, if you consider surgeon deed of free surgery for poor as good-deed or ibadah, then can you show me anywhere Prophet (SAW) told that a person should do heart surgery free to poor as good-deed (or ibadah)?
If you could not show that, then you should avoid lying in the name of Prophet (SAW) that Prophet (SAW) showed us every form of Ibadah, as associating thing to Prophet (SAW) that he never mentioned is bohtan on Prophet (SAW) and big sin.
You should say that Islam gave us ‘guidance and broad guidelines of good and bad’ and within that guidance and guidelines, doing all good deeds for sake of Allah, and avoiding bad deeds for sake of Allah, is ibadah.
[Actually, in most cases, guidance and broad guidelines that Islam gave to Muslims as good and bad is commonly found amongst humans as human values, as good and bad human values are what Allah has created and gave to humanity. Further, when Allah sent prophets (AS), they called human towards that same human values that Allah gave to humans as humanity].
[quote]
btw i dont claim to be in a position to outright ban or allow milad, what i really take exception to is poking in of other concepts
[/quote]
Bhai, aap tou kuch bhie nahi hou. Fact is that even Shaitan (Iblis) for whom Milad-ul-Nabi is day of grief, has no power to stop ummah-e-Rasul celebrate Eid (Happiness) on Milad-ul-Nabi. Even Shaitanic army of suicide bombers could not stop ummah-e-Rasul celebrate Eid on Milad-ul-Nabi,
[quote]
[quote]
Originally Posted by Sa1eem
Hmmm ... I only know one person (Shaitan) and his team in entire universe who had reasons to be unhappy the day Prophet (SAW) was born, are still unhappy about that birth, feel unhappy when anyone remembers and celebrate birth of Prophet (SAW), and throughout tries to demean Prophet (SAW) by various ways, and tries that people, especially followers of Prophet (SAW), forget Prophet (SAW) and his birth. Their hate, grudge and jealously towards Prophet (SAW) is so great that they do not even like people visiting Prophet (SAW) last abode in Madina.
Khawrjees were declared Kharjees because they started judging other Muslims according to their understanding of Islam and declaring them kafirs (doing takfeer).
Actually, if you will read posts, you will find that it is you, not me, who regularly question beliefs of other Muslims and judge them according to your understanding of Islam, and even do not hesitate to consider them non-Muslim. Now, what should I call you, I would not like to say.
[/quote]
labelling people kharjees is your speciality not just on this forum but everywhere
[/quote]
I only label people kharjees who try to impose their beliefs over others by force, call other Muslims ‘Kafir’, believe on suicide, and/or kill other Muslims in the name of Islam (their understanding of Islam). I do that, because that is what they are, and there is nothing wrong in that.
As for your quoting my above statements, all of them are true and I stand by them.
[quote]
btw calling someone or group as following shaitan is takfeer, it is nambar wan takfeer.
[/quote]
You are absolutely wrong. :) Calling someone (even Muslim) ‘follower of Shaitan’ is neither calling that person ‘Kafir’ nor ‘Kharjee’. Reason is simple, that is, whenever Muslim does anything bad, or sinful, our belief is that, the person follows Shaitan.
Example: When in Sialkot, Muslims were kicking and beating two brothers to death, they were following Shaitan. That does not made them Kafir or Kharjee, still no one can say that at that time they were not following Shaitan.
As calling someone ‘Kharjee’ or ‘Muslim’: To me, all who call themselves Muslims (confess that they are Muslims) are Muslims, however different their beliefs could be from mine. Exceptions are those who do takfeer and use force in trying to impose their understanding of Islam over others, as they are Kharjees. These people are following Shaitan even though they claim they are following Islam. Calling such people Kharjees is not takfeer.
Takfeer: Takfeer is calling someone Kafir who is Muslim (confesses to be Muslim). Anyhow, calling someone Kharjee is not same as calling that person Kafir, because Kafir cannot be Kharjee but someone calling himself Muslim could be.
Actually, when someone claiming to be Muslim calls a ‘Muslim person’ Kafir (does takfeer) than the caller really becomes Kafir (as a person can only do takfir if that person thinks he has authority of Allah to judge another person’s beliefs, and such thinking makes him Kafir). Anyhow, to be safe, a Muslim prefers to call such person Kharjee. :)