Re: Who killed Hazrat Hussain r.a?
Brother , one thing i want to clear to all muslim brothers and sisters that Allah will not ask from me , on the day of judgement , that why muavia(ra) and ali(ra) fighted and who was corect and if you give wrong answer , I will put you into hell.Brother , He will not ask me anyhing like that , He will ask me , did you offerr 5 prayers , gave zakat , kept roza , hajj, helped poor , jihad aginst your nafs and so that .He will not ask what other did , Allah will ask what i did and that what i believe in..............So we keep on fighting our whole life who is true or who is false or who is better or who is worse ,It is none of my business , Allah has the ultimate domain of ""Justice" and let him exercise this domain......
Secondly, i think , both sides have to do some concessions , because it takes two make a quarrel means " tali hamaisha do haton sai bajti hai"
I do not know from which conutry you belong but me , living in ,Pakistan , experienced many things which are not islamic but yet we do it .For example , in our marriages in indo-pak region , we do "mehandi" on first day then "barat" and finall""walima" , now this"mahaindi" has nothing to do with isalm , it is purely a "hindu" festival but now 99.99% marriages cannot take place witout "mehendi" why ? because for 1000 years we have benn living with hindus so due to this long period now , it looks very common to us .Hardly anyone , who very strictly follow quran and sunnah , not do "mehendi" otherwise everyone do it .Similarly , "juta chupai"(steal shoes) ad " doodh pilai"( to drink milk) are also very common so that with 1000 years of living , eating , drinking together , both sides have intermixed so many things , customs , rituals and festivals that now nobody knows particarly about a festival that whether is it a muslim originated or a hindu one???? just as " basant"( flying kites ) etc etc..
Similarly , the peple living in Iran and Iraq before islam , for thousand of years , under Sassanid empire , like dara , jamshed , kaikoous , kiyani , nowsherva , bahman , and the first one was "namrood" in abraham(as) period .Now all these kings called themselves as Allah in manly form(God man) , that Allah has spirtually come to earth in the form of a ruler and secodly , the"fire domes" were keep on burning for thosands of years in these two conuntries as they follow "Zartisht" or Zartosht & Zoroastrianism and religious leaders of these fire-domes had a very powerful authority over people as well as government , the took taxes , religious gifts"Nazrana" from people , people asked the religious problems and their commandment was final , they took wealth from poor people in their fire-domes with a plea that God will happy from you as much as you give your money .They were also in administration and they had a right to "punish" anyone or"relaese" anyone.So ruler also has a respect to them as people do .So this"religious" class whether we call them" pujari" , " mazbhi taikhaidar" or " nazranai khanai walay" the similar as we see in indo -pak a diffrent shrines and graves of aulia like " Ajmir sharif" or"Pak patan" etc etc.The similar was the case , in those days , in India where"Brahman" also enjoyed all thse "luxuries" and " benifets" and also in "Roman empire " where "chritians fathers" , "padriis" also have a commandment on people.
Science was abandoned and no right of freedom of speech and expression.
So when islam came in Iraq and Iran , the first thing happened that all fire -domes extinguished , secondly , the "government" of these religious classs also came to end because in islam there is no concept of such things ,To obey Allah and rasool , is a simple way .No grave , shrines and people giving wealth to them.So , this was a end of thier rule of thousands of year. Secondly , they cannot accept that thier ruler , which they consider as God in human form can ever be defeated , again anger .Third and most importantly , they could not believe that the " camel riders" and " budhhu" of "Arabia" , which they used to call them " ignorant " , barbarian and "un cultered" , how they can defeat " wold super power " in only few years .Now this thing is beyond thier mental limits that how can this be possible .We , the super power , of thousands of years , advanced in litrerature , arts , cultures , architechture , buildingds , domes , scruptures and tradionally so rich people , and how these "tribe men" living in deserts and have no culture and arts , came over us...................
So brother , their reaction is natural .Just think , if Afghanistan in 4 or 5 years " will defeat whole europe and then rled them , although create a justice system , have a freedom of religion except a small amount of " jazya" , will europe not react that these barbarian ansd tribel men of "uzbek" , "tajik" and "pakhtun" , living for centuries into mountainns and fighting over each other , cvulturally illeterate now become our ruler , the ruler of Europe , a centre of culture , arts and architechture so it was a natural behaviour of " iran" and " iaqi" people of that time .And this was the beginning of """" Clash between Arabian and Persian nationalism""""""""""""" .And the "religious" leades of fire-domes added fire to the fuel becuse they had lost thier rule .Abdullah ibne Saba , a cunning jewish , came to medina , obseved all this , then came back to egypt anf "kufa" and used all these points in his favour and and burnt such a huge flame of fire of revenge , misconceptions and hatred thar , everything disappeared into it and this also happened because some "umayyad" caliphs preached"Arabian nationalism" and showed hatred towards "persians" and "ajum" but the ultimate loss was to all muslims................
Psychologically , he played with the psyche of iranis and iraqis that who , thousands of years , have been experiencing their ruler as "god" or say it " autar " or "duata" etc.. and other thing that in persian empire , the next ruler is the closest relative of previou one and their always continued a chain of a same family ruling for thousands of years and like above i discussed about " mehaendi" in indo-pak , these two concepts are so common for iranis and iraqis that they accepted it at once that is "every prophet has a ""wasi"" and the wasi of muhammad )peace be upon him) is hazrat ali(ra) and secondly the ruler is appointed from God or himself in human form , so to obey him as like a god .Abdullah ibne Saba did exactly , exactly exactly the same technique and unfortunatlet he had a complete success in dividing the muslim nations into two .Tose "religious" leaders of fire-domes preached this concept to its all swing and deviated thousands of them so that they again "regain" thier previous rule .They could impose tax , gave rulings and exercised powe sharing with rulers .In "safvi" rulers of iran and "qachari" rule , they gained so much power that they had a firm grip on government , "Raza shah pehelvi" and "muhammad shah pehelvi" decreased thier power to great extent but after revolution , they again got their powers .Now although Iran is a complete democratical country , yet supreme is not president , or parliment but"Rahbar" who have many many powers and to appoint army , naval ,air chiefs , disapprove any electrol candidate and final ruling will be his. I am not critising anyone but just telling from history . You have observed that we use word "ayt" for verses of quran which mean "nishani" or "symbol" , the same word shia muslims use for their grand ulema" ayoutullah" means " nishani of Allah" that shows they consider them and their rulings from God , a very high place , something from divine and God's connection and to disobey them means you have disobeyed the god almighty . Just read "Al-hakoomata_i_ Islamia" from "Ayoutullah Khoemani" , you will see on pg.no 79 , 78 that " Our ulemas and faqeeh have knowledge of everything , they neither sleep nor they get tired " and on pg no. 141 he writes" we cannot expect the least mistakes from our aymma or ayatullahs" Now you see in "aytul -qursi" the same properties are mention for Allah almighty.
It is very unfortunate that abdullah ibne saba got the weak point and we easily fell prey to it ...................
