Re: What’s going on in Canada?
The Canadian justice ruled in her favor because of her claim that Burqa is her religious obligation. In reality Burqa is not compulsory in Islam and she claims to follow Islam. Hence, here claim is invalid and should have been denied but the court perhaps is not knowledgeable enough about Islam. This is like the case of the Pakistani cab driver in Missouri that sued to wear Shalwar Qameez instead of the company’s uniform because wearing Shalwar Qameez was his religious obligation. He won his suit too but clearly his claim was invalid too.