Syed abduallah saahab .It is still debated that what kind of pakistan jinnah wanted to see.The mullahs will prove with quaids speech that he wanted an islamic pakistan the liberals and those who are following"enlightened Moderation" will prove that jinnah wanted a secular pakistan.
And Is pakistan an islamic country or a Muslim country that is the majority of the population is muslim but without shariah laws.
Do you know anything about history of Indian subcontinent
Sir quaid and chaudhary rehmat ali followed different ideologies.Rehmat ali is not considered a great leader because people disagree with his idea of "millat and her ten nations".When some leaders like chaudhary shujaat wanted to bring the remains of chaudhary rehmat ali to pakistan he was criticised in the press.So just dont quote any leader who has no significance in the Pakistan Movement
Mullahs are too naive to figure out the history. For them, history is a spoonful of thick-propaganda delivered and readily consumed in the darkened hujras.
Off course 7-11 aloo store workers can yap it while on the job. Oh wait! they can take quick breaks for a "free" ganja "deal" with the Jamaican drug dealer in the alley.
I know that he wasn't received well in pakistan, but I was contrasting with certain peoples aspersions that people in foreign lands shouldn't have a say in pakistani politics. In this case, a foreigner gave pakistan its name.
And in the end it doesn't matter what sufi/hindus think as the vast majority of the pakistani constituency would aim to establish islamic laws if given the choice.
I disgree. Paktoonkhwa is a romanticization (<-- if such word exists) of a a few elite and rich Puktoons. Majority of the Pukhtoons have no interest in it. Tribals never bought this idealogy and never will.
Wow! We can even taste your “love” for Shias and Sufis. If it talks like Wahabi, walks like Wahabi, it is the same fanatic $hite.
Then people want to talk about Islamic laws. Wow man Wow!
This well-known columnist must belong to Jamait fifth column. Otherwise he would have put his name on this article. Hamid Ali is playing with Mullahtic ghosts.
[QUOTE]
Wow! We can even taste your "love" for Shias and Sufis. If it talks like Wahabi, walks like Wahabi, it is the same fanatic $hite.
Then people want to talk about Islamic laws. Wow man Wow!
[/QUOTE]
You equally show your love for wahabi "fanatic $hite." The only reason I'm being victimized here is because I'm an arab. It seems the money lenders have brainwashed you through their control of mass media, making it "right and good" to label "fanatics" as "$****e". Yes, we can clearly see your racist diatribe against wahabis and arabs. Please spare me from your zionist platitudes.
[QUOTE]
This well-known columnist must belong to Jamait fifth column. Otherwise he would have put his name on this article. Hamid Ali is playing with Mullahtic ghosts.
[/QUOTE]
Whats wrong with being a fifth column? Every muslim knows who their loyalty should lie with.
The one who is disloyal to his home, his city, his country is disloyal to everything else. No matter how much Arabic he recites, and how many hadis he can quote, he remains a traitor if he messes up his home, and his country.
Now for Arabs, urban concepts such as home or city may not matter much. So they may continue destroying and bombing their own kitchens, living rooms, and bedrooms.
Just do us a favor. bomb your own nomadic areas, and heaps of sand, but leave us alone! Otherwise we have to catch the suicidal maniacs and ship them to GITMO.
In the third battle of panipat the muslims members of the maratha army defected after the afghan side chanted slogans for jihad. This led to the eventual rout of the marathas. Their idols were smashed, their women were carted off as right hand possessions, their once proud countenance was subdued and humiliated. The forces of light had vanquished the forces of pagan idolatry. And you expect me to believe that these muslims who were “disloyal” to their countrymen and are “bad” people, right? Every muslims loyalties shoul lie with mecca. The only ones arguing against this are the ones playing to the crusader gallery.
This is ridiculous. Arabs had no ideas of homes or cities? It could be argued that the concept of a nation, similar to westphalian contructs, was developed in arabia. Also, how can you, a native of pakistan, dare attack an arab in this regard. The natives of pakistan throughout their history were ruled by biharis, kushans, persians, arabs, turks, mughals, afhgans, sikhs, and the british. There was no sense of nationality until muslims came and civilized you penis worshipping natives.
Yes, you can keep being racist towards arabs all you want. It doesn’t even bother me, espescially coming from an incompetent native.
A side note mr pandit antiobl. Those nomadic areas produced soldiers that made the world tremble.
I’m sorry about my previous posts. Its just that racists like mulz, symbol, faruk khan and antiobl keep ridiculing me over my arab ancestory.
Ok Mr. Arab from Bihar. Paniput or put-put-pani has nothing to do with the title of the thread.
If you really want Arabic laws, then go implement them in the land of Milk and Honey aka Bihar (your real ancestral land) or Arabistan (your percieved ancestral land). No matter what, both of those places are heaps of dirt and sand anyway.
For Pakistan, we had a taste of Shariah and Mullahtic laws. The result was truly awful for our minority Shias, Ahmadis, and Christians.
So thank you and keep your Arab ancestry lecture for Bihar, Biharis, and Lallu Parsad Yadva.
[QUOTE]
Ok Mr. Arab from Bihar. Paniput or put-put-pani has nothing to do with the title of the thread.
[/QUOTE]
Keep playing with words or trying to label me. It shows how utterly desperate you are in scrambling for a response devoid of any semblance of a logical rebuttal.
[QUOTE]
If you really want Arabic laws, then go implement them in the land of Milk and Honey aka Bihar (your real ancestral land) or Arabistan (your percieved ancestral land). No matter what, both of those places are heaps of dirt and sand anyway.
[/QUOTE]
You still don't get it do you pandit ji. First you ridicule me for being an arab, then you ridicule me on my purportedly being a bihari. However, as much as I hate to admit it, both these areas have a proud glorious history while you racist natives of pakistan have been ruled over by everyone. The natives of pakistan, pre-islam, were a barbaric people that worshipped penis statues. Thats all they ever accomplished. Full stop mr. pandit ji.
Also, they are not arabic laws. They are islamic laws mr. pandit ji.
[QUOTE]
For Pakistan, we had a taste of Shariah and Mullahtic laws. The result was truly awful for our minority Shias, Ahmadis, and Christians.
So thank you and keep your Arab ancestry lecture for Bihar, Biharis, and Lallu Parsad Yadva.
[/QUOTE]
Like I said earlier before you resorted to insulting my ethnicity, noone in pakistan cares what a tombstone/lingam worshipping sufi thinks.
