Re: What should Pakistani laws be based on?
Sufi islam?
Is this the islam where hindus traded in their pandits and idols for pirs and tombstones? Calling a sufi a muslim is similar to calling an indonesian “muslim” a proper muslim.
Sufis are usually hopped up on heroin, or in the case they have received no money from begging or performing “magic”, they whirl around in circles to get dizzy, a natural euphoria.
I’m glad that as everyday passes by, this sufi/hindu syncretism is being wiped out all over pakistan. Before partition you might have called pakistanis sufis, but now they are muslims proper. You got that pandit ji?
Buddhists and equality? Are you mad?
Yes, and you will see no arab denying this historical fact. Not unlike you natives of pakistan who deny your penis worshipping history.
Points antiobl “forgot” to respond to after he could offer no sane rebuttal to jinnah wanting an islamic state and went off on a tangent about supposed arab barbarity:
He said:
1)Arabs had no sense of nationhood.
To which I responded:
-Arabs had a clear idea of a nation with the coming of islam
-It was actually the barbaric natives of pakistan who were too busy worshipping their statues to form a nation
-The natives of pakistan were ALWAYS ruled by foreigners be it the biharis, kushans, persians, arabs, turks, mughals, afhgans, sikhs, or the british

I’m so sorry about digressing from the main topic, but as you can clearly see, antiobl refused to give a logical rebuttal and went off on a wild tangent about arabs and supposed lack of civilization. If he continues will you move our posts to a new thread? You can title it “lack of civilization in arabia.”
I’m sure arab haters like antiobl, mulz, faruk khan and symbol will have a field day.