What should Pakistani laws be based on?

Re: What should Pakistani laws be based on?

Sufi Islam was accepted by Sindh and Punjab way before Biharis quit worshipping idols. Oh wait! Shurdas were not allowed in the temples. They just used to clean Brahman toilets.

Pakistani areas on the other hand believed in Budhist way of equality that was pretty foreign to even Arabs before the advent of Islam.

In fact Arabs were so deranged that Allah had to respond to the 911 calls of Arab girls burried alive by their Arab parent.

Re: What should Pakistani laws be based on?

Closer to the topic or closer to the lock... :p

Re: What should Pakistani laws be based on?

Sufi islam?:smilestar: Is this the islam where hindus traded in their pandits and idols for pirs and tombstones? Calling a sufi a muslim is similar to calling an indonesian “muslim” a proper muslim.

Sufis are usually hopped up on heroin, or in the case they have received no money from begging or performing “magic”, they whirl around in circles to get dizzy, a natural euphoria.

I’m glad that as everyday passes by, this sufi/hindu syncretism is being wiped out all over pakistan. Before partition you might have called pakistanis sufis, but now they are muslims proper. You got that pandit ji?

Buddhists and equality? Are you mad?:omg:

Yes, and you will see no arab denying this historical fact. Not unlike you natives of pakistan who deny your penis worshipping history.

Points antiobl “forgot” to respond to after he could offer no sane rebuttal to jinnah wanting an islamic state and went off on a tangent about supposed arab barbarity:
He said:
1)Arabs had no sense of nationhood.
To which I responded:
-Arabs had a clear idea of a nation with the coming of islam
-It was actually the barbaric natives of pakistan who were too busy worshipping their statues to form a nation
-The natives of pakistan were ALWAYS ruled by foreigners be it the biharis, kushans, persians, arabs, turks, mughals, afhgans, sikhs, or the british

:hooray:

I’m so sorry about digressing from the main topic, but as you can clearly see, antiobl refused to give a logical rebuttal and went off on a wild tangent about arabs and supposed lack of civilization. If he continues will you move our posts to a new thread? You can title it “lack of civilization in arabia.”

I’m sure arab haters like antiobl, mulz, faruk khan and symbol will have a field day.

Re: What should Pakistani laws be based on?

I think we should be only discussing how to implement Laws first.

nothing can change if a good law is not implemented.