principally i agree to the whole concept of leadership (Imamat) however its only refers to Hazrat Ali is highly questionable ................... provided the knowledge , experience , administrative capability , leadership quality, power to make judgment in adverse situation, and ability to unite muslims from various nation/tribe.
**in all respect three caliphs were superior to Hazrat Ali (keeping aside last part of hazrat Osman regime). **if we see hazrat ali life from the eyes of historian his era was fraught wid controversies and approx 50% muslim did not even consider him caliph (living in syria and egypt controlled by hazrat Muaiviah) and he could not rose to occasion as a true leader to turn the odds in his favour.
some scohlar try to present hazrat ali as he was someone divine and superior to all the sahaba does not seems true.
Beside that shia imamat concept is also does not seem trure. as** not only muhajireen but also ansar ( who were local of madina ) did not supported hazrat ali*. instead they wanted to make* Hazrat Saad Bin Ubada** (sardar of banu khazruj ) the caliph. but most of shia scholars keep abusing first two caliphs for this. the fact was Hazrat Ali was not considered as a serious option for calphship due to his inexperience, young age and at that time he had not that leadership quality to keep different tribes of arab united.
on the other hand hazrat abu bakar and hazrat were seasoned sardars of queresh and very well known 4 their ability to setlle the disputes among arab. beside they were close associates of prophet.
further the performance of first two caliphs speak volume of their taqwa, administrative capabilty and leadership qualities.
Even in his famous book** "THE 100"** Michael H Heart ranked Hazrat Omer bin Khattab as 56th **most influential personalty ever lived in this world. the book contains the list of the ppl whose action influenced the world geography, history and culture. (Hazrat omer is the only muslim Beside **prophet Muhammad who is ranked no 1 in the list by Michael H Heart)
u r quoting from sah bukhrai. There is a Hadith in Sahih Bukari Volume 1 **in which **Hazrat Omer bin Khattab has been praised for his knowledge. beside other hadiths in which it has narrated that** Hazrat Abu Bakar** did Imamat when Prophet was ill before his death.
so one shud avoid cherrypicking ?
Umer called Abu Bakr's caliphate "an evil" and felt that the muslims were protected from its evil because Abu bakr was such an amazing man.
Umer in turn was nominated by Abu Bakr and Umer created a committee of 6 where the tie breaker vote was with the cousin of the favored candidate.
Let's have a separate discussion on this instead of accusing me of cherry picking.
Btw if Mr. Heart's ranking is so relevant for you then Charles Darwin (16), Gengis Khan (29) and Adolf Hitler (39) are much better than Umer who is number (52).
Hadrat Ali inherited the seeds of trouble sown at Saqeefa and strengthened during the rule of the first 3.
Please read Quran, Musa made Aaron his deputy and similar things happened that the companions rather listen to Saamri and his golden calf.