Re: What is haram di kamai?
I mean, she said herself that is was based off her husband’s discomfort. Even before factoring in her husband, this is something she was not opposed to doing so it is not like she was having a moral crisis about it earlier. Her asking about “haram di kamai” is something that came afterwards in her train of thought after her husband’s rejection of what she wanted to do. What I wanted to critique is that sometimes trying to apply principles from a bygone era to something like this is not practical, and that shoehorning religion is not necessary for what she wants to do. She is free to reject my opinion if she is truly dedicated to being a full on practicing Muslim but just from reading the OP whether it was “haram di kamai” was not something she was thinking about. Literally, this is how dumb religious debates come about. People try to mask their hatred or discomfort of something “modern” and try to shoehorn religion in to give their discomfort some weight when it doesn’t add anything but appeal to peoples morals.
I’m getting flak for it because people think me stating objective truths (that Islam was established in the 7th century and thus would have some principles that were products of the time of Muhammed) is somehow attacking their entire being.