Bhai if you are not interested in reading the answers then it is not our fault.
We request you to interpret quran and hadith like sahabah and earlier scholars did, if you are deviating from the established aqeedah then you should have a self check first.
look Mr popat, what best we can achieve after days of discussion on your aqaidh? maximum that Hadrat essa alihaysallam is no more alive, there will be a new prophet(under whatever defination) but the main point that MGAQ was mehdi or not that we are now discussing here will remain unanswered.
Through my experiance in discussing aqeedah of this group i am certain that the shortest way to know what is haq is through establishment of credibility of MGAQ.
See , what is more better route, collecting samples of water and sending them to lab waiting for weeks and getting results that the water is not healthy to drink or by just visiting the water source that is right in front of you to see how much filth is in there.
Just check the declassified information that i shared for 1974 assembly session on the issue.
Bhai your standard is quran o hadith do not mean that you follow quran and hadith. we believe that your intrepretation of quran and hadith do not corelate with the intrepretation of ijmah of ummat from 1500 years. This has been proved at this very forum so many times.
Haq is evident from the posts of respected brothers Ibn Saddique and Psyah, all you have to do is not to let your biases stop you from accepting haq.