[quote]
After the atrocities that were commited with the Prophets' family at the desert in Karbala, there were TWO main groups of people:
[/quote]
wrong .... there were 4 groups of muslims since the time of murder of uthman till end of second civil war
1-pro-uthman ummayyad
2-pro-uthman but antiummayyad makkans
3-Pro-Ali
4-Khawarij
[quote]
1) Group that celebrated: Yazeed ibn Muawiya (had a charater with every habit that a good Muslim must never have), Marwan Ibn Hakam (his family was condemened and sent into exile from Mecca by the Prophet himself), Ibn Ziyad (son of a prostitute and killer of Ashaab), Omar Ibn Saad etc
2) Group that mourned: The nobile family of our Prophet (pbuh) including the noble wives like Umme Salma (sa), the pious Sahaba and the true lovers and followers of the Prophet of Islam.
Now its our own choice which group we would like to follow
[/quote]
u are fastfowarding to the 16th century .Many groups /sects of muslims have existed since then and 12er shias appeared only after 2nd century hijrah.Nor can 12ers alone claim to speak on the behalf of all imams of ahlulbayt.
btw why the political correctness why dont u mention the alleged murderer of Fatima in the first group ?
[quote]
"I m leaving among you something which is very important and should be followed, you will not go astray if you get hold of it after I am gone, one part of it being more important than the other: Allah's Book, which is a rope stretched from Heaven to Earth, and my close relatives, who belong to my household (Ahlul Bayt). These two will not separate from one another till they come down to the reservoir, so consider how you act regarding them after my departure." (Sahi Tirmidhi, Sahih Muslim)
This hadith is presented through 14 different chains in the books. 13 of them have "Quran & Ahlul Bayt" and not what you have in your signature. If you understand this single point then i guess you will not question the mourning of Imam Hussain (as).
[/quote]
no one doubts the jist of this .... i think u have the misconception that all ahle sunnah are nawasib or khawarij
I agree that there are many inconsistencies in the "official" beliefs of ahle sunnah but it wud be a gross exaggeration to say that criticism of enemies of Ali /his sons in history is strictly due to efforts of ithna asharis [infact most of their crimes are welldocumented by earlier non-12er historians].....books of all sects are full of evidences against them and most imams of ahlesunnah have criticised them in their works.
But explicit condemnation was prohibited because of the ruler's decree and meant that discussion of intra-sahaba conflicts was confined mainly to history/rijal books.
Also the hadith masters discouraged these debates as it gave their opponents more ammo to use against hadith narraters and target them.Thats why discussion of these events gradually lost popularity amongst sunni ulemas.In their eyes the preservation of hadith as a whole was more important than the explicit condemnation of a few individuals , and in their time that was not a unreasonable decision.