One can easily argue that Jinnah's understanding of both Secularism and Islam were far from being strong. Not to disparage the man, as his role in the creation of Pakistan was nothing short of great, but when one reads his thoughts on Islam and Secularism, one gets the idea he doesn't really know what hes talking about. You can see this clearly if you find an interview he had with Margaret Bourke. Again, no man is perfect, without vices, so I'm not putting him down, but any intelligent person can see the inherent contradictions in some of his views.
Also, to your second point, right across the eastern border there is an amply supply of would be slaves that can be captured in war.
across the border in east india ] there are slaves but of poor quality generally speaking.Maybe in punjab there are better as they are more sturdy ....so good for farm work, cheap labor but not much more although some wud like their women too.Feeding them will be a big problem and we definately have to force them to work as they are inherently lazy.
better slaves can be found across western border but they are muslims so cannot be enslaved.
jinnah worshipping by the religious lobby is the biggest contradiction in pakistan.Jinnah never wanted a theocratic state in pakistan.So I agree with u there.