WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

ehsan · April 28, 2007, 6:58pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

272/4 off 37 overs.

AQ · April 28, 2007, 6:58pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

now these manhoos goraas will be against Aleem Dar…

taste the medicine of your own HAIR Feeders

ehsan · April 28, 2007, 6:59pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

This score is good enough for 50 overs let alone 38 overs.

GoldenAsif · April 28, 2007, 7:00pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

272/4 off 37 overs

mercenary2k · April 28, 2007, 7:00pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Dar, the Darrel Hair of Australia :)

ehsan · April 28, 2007, 7:00pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Aleem Dar was right according to the laws of the game.

mercenary2k · April 28, 2007, 7:01pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

yup, commentators just confirmed it

Sehar · April 28, 2007, 7:01pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

ehsan bhai, what happened with Aleem Dar?

AQ · April 28, 2007, 7:01pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

now commentators are accepting

Aleem Dar is the best

mercenary2k · April 28, 2007, 7:02pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

was Aleem Dar a player once?

AQ · April 28, 2007, 7:03pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Farnando ^%&^%&%^&%#^

The_Old_Man · April 28, 2007, 7:03pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

:) Seemed a bit harsh though? Lot's of tension in the middle.

GoldenAsif · April 28, 2007, 7:04pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Mark Nicholas Pri** who had a go at Dar earlier for disallowing a run to Clarke because he deliberately ran on the pitch is made to eat his words.

Aleem Dar was right in disallowing the run according to the laws of cricket

AQ · April 28, 2007, 7:04pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

He used to play with Waqar et al.... i think i watched his interview where he did mention playing domestic or first class cricket.. not sure...

acrobi123 · April 28, 2007, 7:04pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

quack quack quack :)

ehsan · April 28, 2007, 7:04pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Australia 281/4 off 38 overs. Huge, huge score.

GoldenAsif · April 28, 2007, 7:05pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Australia 281/4 off their quota of 38 overs

acrobi123 · April 28, 2007, 7:05pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Yes he had played 1st class cricket, a leg spinner.

Sa1eem · April 28, 2007, 7:05pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

I think that main difference is Gilchrist hittings. It is possible that if one of 5 top SL batsmen can do similar, nothing is lost still. 280 is not an impossible target. Its only 38 overs game and we cannot take the score similar to 50 overs game. 281 in 38 overs is like 330-335 in 50 overs game.

With pitch is at it is, nothing is impossible. Only quick loss of SL wickets would make the game impossible for SL.

acrobi123 · April 28, 2007, 7:05pm

Re: WC2007 Final: SL v AUS

Did they change the luch hour to tea time? or lunch is 45 minutes?