WC: Where does the Buck stop?

The writers gone to town on the PCB, but he does make a good point. The system needs a radical change and the present chairman has been in for 3 years. Morally he should resign.

The buck has stopped

Masood Hasan

The writer is a Lahore-based columnist and a well-known journalist

[email protected]

Three times semi finalists and one time world champions, Pakistan were predictably thrown out like common garbage from the 2003 World Cup last Tuesday sinking our reputation to an all-time low. This is the culmination of the rot that set in almost four years back. Our team – more importantly, our cricket has gone to the dogs. For millions of our people who lead lives of great deprivation, the game stands for something more than just the game that it is. This Cup for whom we have suffered four years of self-praise and related rubbish from the PCB and for whose successful capture the PCB had developed meticulous plans (‘I want the Cup on my table,’) resulted in disappointment, frustration, heartbreak and seething rage. At the end of all the super talk, all the claims, all the stifling of criticism, all the arrogance and all the warped policies, the whole campaign sank with just about as much fizz as last year’s left over cola. Now the great game of passing the buck has begun.

While the gods poured rain and scorn in Bulawayo on the damp afternoon of March 4, that most agreeable TV compere, Mohsin Hassan Khan, whose ambition in life is to forever agree with the establishment, talked with Mr Bari, the chief selector (of what, we don’t quite know), and eventually the PCB chairman. As expected, the general wasted no time and laid the blame on the touring selection squad, the captain and all the senior players. No one else was responsible for the worst ever performance by Pakistan since the World Cup began in 1975. Even before the team is unceremoniously shoved into the first flights home and even before it slinks into Pakistan, in ones and twos, the case has been opened and shut in double quick time. In another world, this may be the way to bury this particularly rotting corpse, but unfortunately the time has come for the magnificent men of Pakistan’s cricket superstructure to answer questions though this is not a country of accountability, the practice confined to a select few for cosmetic purposes. Cricket does not belong to those who strut about with swagger sticks in the plush offices of Gaddafi Stadium, but the common people whose hearts rise and fall on the streets of Pakistan.

For years, good counsel provided free of cost to the PCB to set its priorities right have fallen by the wayside. Instead, a coterie of favourites, chosen at whim, has been given carte blanche authority to play havoc with the game. People like Intikhab Alam had hinted darkly months ago that we stood no chance at the World Cup unless we drastically re-evaluated our strategies, our players and our officials. Majid Khan, spoke, wrote and wrung his large hands in anguish warning that the fundamentals were wrong. Imran, whose views and judgments on cricket are brilliant, spoke many times straight from the heart and pleaded with the PCB to set things right. Today, if Pakistan’s cricket lies in tatters, why should anyone be surprised? It has been coming for a long time; only the PCB refused to see it that way. Pakistan’s cricket fell into the wrong hands that were never qualified to run it from the first day – but that’s the story of our land, isn’t it?

The enquiry board set up by the PCB is a joke and an outright insult. Its composition of paid PCB employees and beneficiaries and the presence of so many nobodies speaks volumes about the sincerity of the effort, a last ditch effort to cloud the real issues. The Naushads, Ranas, et al are pre-programmed to place the blame at every door other than the chairman’s. Everyone knows that the general has run the PCB without any one daring to question his decisions. The few who did were shown the door. Those who wrote against his policies were either bought over or sorted out in other ways. When a military campaign fails, it’s the general who takes the rap, not the corporal. PCB has been a one-man show since 1999. Pakistan has continued to plummet getting sound thrashing from one team after another, winning only against mediocre sides. The South African safari is only the rotting icing on the rotten cake. The general’s heart may be in the right place, but that is not good enough. Good intentions don’t win world trophies. His buddies may love Vision 2005, but it doesn’t solve our problems. There is no constitution, no cricket council to ask questions, challenge decisions or order independent enquiries since the golden age of cricket dawned. If the PCB wished to run its affairs along professional lines, why weren’t these fundamental steps taken? It doesn’t require Einstein to work out how cricket should be run. We have known it for years, yet such is the lust for power and glory that neither has the PCB been built into a mature, responsible and progressive body nor has Pakistan’s domestic cricket ever been organised properly.

Dumping Moin and appointing Waqar captain 22 months back was a disaster. We have set something of a world record in disasters since then. Every court jester at Gaddafi Stadium told us ad nauseum that they were concentrating on 2003. Was the farce we saw unfold their unique contribution for three long years? The PCB chairman surrounded himself with obliging rubber stamps, favourites, sycophants, court jesters and mediocre rankers who faithfully echoed their master’s voice. These men came and went, making bundles of money, taking trips abroad, having a great time and confounding matters. Money was frittered away – cricketers promised Rs20 million each for winning the Cup and 14 million blown on an ill-planned fiasco to send off the team that only reflected the chaos and confusion that was later to become the signature tune of our squad of players and free loaders.

Foreign coaches were hired indiscriminately, past heroes and prolific cricketers at home ignored or hired and sacked at will, while white skins pocketed salaries that are too obscene to be named here. They contributed nothing, yet no one could dare question this. Absolute nobodies wielded influence and power far beyond their capabilities. People like Sikander Bakht, a mediocre player and not exactly famous for his brains, ruled as cricket analyst. On Shoaib Akhtar, this Board squandered millions, even placing a personal doctor and a personal fast bowling coach, yet he got thumped all over South Africa. The great Tendulkar showed him the difference between chalk and cheese. In the simplistic thinking and bragging ways that was the PCB’s mission statement, the goods train from Rawalpindi would win us the Cup hands down, single-handedly! We changed four batting openers in four matches, we travelled with an unfit Azhar Mehmood who enjoyed a tour on which he never played, we dumped Saqlain and Sami, for reasons known only to the general and God and continued playing the pea-brained, talent-less Afridi. We sent nine officials, a new record, but Mr Butt of the PCB said that was a lie, since only eight had gone! Waqar Younis was no captain, a man totally out of touch with his team, yet he was picked over Wasim. This and dozens of more mistakes were made by the PCB in an arrogant and vile fashion. Disaster was written on every wall from day one, but who was reading the writing on the wall? The Inzi-Younis-Anwar brawl picture says it all.

Cricket is dead. What we have is cricket’s Ojhri Camp. There must be a post mortem but not by the chosen drones of the PCB. This insult the general cannot heap on our sagging shoulders. The enquiry has to be an above the board, free of interference, independent, honest and brutal examination of a national failure. The game is much larger than the petty men who have ruined it. It is already late but the general must do the honourable thing and step down. This failure is very much his doing. The buck has come to a full stop. And this time perhaps, President Pervez Musharraf should be gracious to accept his departure and spare the nation the agony of suffering another general. For starters, let us restore the PCB Constitution and give cricket back to the people.

I quite agree with the writer. The buck stops with three people, Tauqir Zia, Waqar and Pybus. True the whole team did not perform well but the rap has to be taken by the people who run the show. Pybus has taken his share of the blame and resigned. Tauqir Zia and Waqar should follow. It will be a shame and great injustice to Pakistan cricket if these two survive.

** This thread will serve as the focal point of dsicussion on the deliberations of the committee and therefore all the relevant comments and articles should be posted here. **

PCB Review Committee meets](http://uk.cricinfo.com/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/MAR/153858_PAK_08MAR2003.html)

The Review Committee, constituted by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) to review the performance of the Pakistan cricket team in the ICC Cricket World Cup 2003, held its first meeting at the Gaddafi Stadium on Saturday. The meeting lasted nearly seven hours during which the three-man committee outlined its course of action. The meeting was attended by Col (retd) Naushad Ali (chairman), Aqib Javed and Sultan Rana.

“It was a productive meeting in which we shared our thoughts and decided how to go about the assignment that has been given to us. We have outlined our course of action and for the next two weeks, we will sit together so that we can meet our deadline of March 23,” chairman of the committee Col (retd) Naushad Ali said.

Naushad dispelled impressions that his committee was an inquiry committee. “It is a review committee that will study the technical aspects of the team’s performance and recommend suggestions how can the team’s performance for future can be improved.”

Naushad said his committee, if required, would invite members of the Pakistan team, management of the team and officials of the cricket board. “If we have to reach to the bottom, we will have to talk to everyone who was associated with the team whether it be players, management or members of the cricket board. There will be an honest, sincere effort in which there will be transparency,” he said.

He said the cricket board has provided his committee footages of all the six matches, records of the players, records of grounds on which the matches were played, statistics about the opponents and all other relevant material.

First of all, i must say that Inzi-younis brawl is blown totally out of proprtion. It was exaggerated by media mostly. Secondly, Waqar showed signs of a good captain initially in England, Westindies and in Australia. But he Totally lost it later on, lost the plot, what i think that fear of losing got the better of him. He was Very aggresive when he took over the reins but continuous losses since august changed his captaincy style. He develpoed into a conservative captain. Yes he should defintely resign. But stop gap captain will be a mystery. From what i see and observe, Wasim and Rashid Latif are two main contenders. People say that we should dump seniors and bring in youngsters, well some seniors are must in the team. We just cant play with a team full of youngsters, not the right attitude.

All the BEst Pakistan.

Writer Hasan has hit the nail on the head, I must say!

Why was Moin Khan sacked? Any reasons? Please tell me. I wanna know. Last time, under Moin's captaincy Pakistan defeated South Africa in Sharjah, as I remember. Moin needs to be back in the team, though, Rashid is a good wicket keeper, but I'd prefer to see Moin. He's a good batsman than Rashid, not WK but we need to strengthen our batting.

For one reason, I liked his piece of writing. He didn't go around bashing Inzi for his failure. In fact, it made PCB and crictics Inzi's failure because of his weight, duh! I have a feelin' Inzi spent too much time on diet than practicing on nets. Even Javed Miandad, in his recent interview, confessed Inzi's worst time. Couple of weeks left for Sharjah Tournament, he needs to eat alot of parathas', dahi, Andaay, dawn bread and drink lassi. Then, he'll sing:

**Amerika Kay Nah Japan Kay.

Hum Tu Hain Deewane Multan Kay.**

Waqar as a Captain, has been proven failure over and over again. Not giving chances to Sami, Azhar and Saqlain was the biggest mistake done by Waqar. When Pakistan defeated Australia in Australia last June, it was like we have won the World Cup! I'm sure rest of the Pakistanis would share the same feelin'. But now, it's time for a change. It's time for a new beginning. For Captaincy, Wasim is the only choice. Moin Khan would be another option.

Regardin' Shoaib, Allah Khair, we have spent millions of dollars and got nothing. PCB should stop treatin' him different than other players. First, he needs to control his mouth. After that, accurate his line and length. His economy rate is unbelieveably high!

I remember, when Pakistan lost Test Series against Australia, Tauqir Zia resigned but President didn't accept it; and wanted him to serve as a PCB Director. I got no hard feelings for Tauqir Zia but we certainly need new management. In fact, hiring of coach, chosing Captain, all Tauqir Zia did it. It would be good for him to resign with remaining respect he has got left.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Wasim is the only choice. Moin Khan would be another option.

[/QUOTE]

That's true, we need Akram as a captain as we needed him in 92 as a strike bowler. But he should also be told in clear words that he won't be captain alone. He will have to build us a team that could stand tall in the world of cricket.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

Regardin' Shoaib, Allah Khair, we have spent millions of dollars and got nothing.
[/QUOTE]

He should be handed over to the NAB. After all we have spent so much of money on this bugger. It's time for accountability!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

I got no hard feelings for Tauqir Zia ... It would be good for him to resign with remaining respect he has got left.
[/QUOTE]

The half-general should be court martialed. After seeing his leadership in PCB, I wonder what type of a leader he would be among his soldiers!

Mr Hasan’s article was fairly reserved compared to this one lol, I think the writer here wants the whole team sacked!!

http://www.nation.com.pk/daily/mar-2003/9/EDITOR/op1.asp

Humayun Gauhar
Can you grow a rose in a gutter? Our cricket affairs reflect our
national affairs, so why this huge lament? If Pakistan can be yo-yoed
between politicians who dig our national hole then generals who keep
on digging, what chance cricket? The hole is so deep now that
daylight is scant. If the corrupt can contest elections and enter
parliament, when murderers, thieves, kidnappers and runners of
protection rackets can adorn our governments, why can’t match fixers
be in the cricket team? If those who know nothing about running
public sector corporations can be allowed to run them into the
ground, why can’t those who know nothing about cricket run it into
the ground too? If failed and fake politicians and all-knowing
generals can be given vital national institutions to make an unholy
mess of, why can’t failed and frustrated cricketers be allowed to
make a mess of vital functions in the Pakistan Cricket Board? It’s
called running to type.
Led by the wrong captain, we went into every World Cup match with
only two wicket-taking bowlers, Wasim Akram and Shoaib Akhtar. Waqar
is past it. We had two passengers who pass as all rounders, Shahid
Afridi and Abdul Razzaq. Thus when it came to them we could only hope
to be given wickets, not to take them. An all rounder is at least a
top class batsman or bowler and good in the other department. The
best all rounder is great in both. Imran Khan was our best bowler and
second best batsman after Miandad. He was the first to take 300 Test
wickets and retired with an average of over 37, and more than 50
after he became captain. Our all rounders are bits and pieces batsmen
and bowlers. Any surprise then that the old warhorse Wasim Akram, our
only genuine all rounder, took more wickets and scored more runs than
Razzaq and Afridi did? Better to have gone in with five specialist
bowlers and five specialist batsmen.
We’re bored stiff hearing that our batsmen cannot cope on fast,
bouncy wickets. Then make fast bouncy wickets instead of persisting
with mud from graveyards. But please stop making excuses. I’m no
expert on cricket, but I certainly know no less, and most possibly
more, than the chairmen who have been gracing the PCB. All normal
little boys dream of becoming Test cricketers, but as they grow up
the realization dawns that not everyone is cut out for it. Who in his
right mind wants a 100 MPH ball whizzing past his nose? Yet comically
there are grown men, old men, with ample paunches and scarce hair
that still imagine they would have been international cricketers had
they taken it seriously. This delusion is a condition that afflicts
not just former prime ministers but bureaucrats and generals more.
There’s something called common sense. When Imran Khan, our greatest
cricketer, has been shouting from the rooftops for two decades that
our domestic cricket structure needs to be changed, why not listen to
him? I decided to ask him on one of our regular walks in the jungle
of Islamabad, high with the stench of rotting flesh of wild boar
being culled with poison these days by the brain damaged Capital
Development Authority. “Because people with vested interests, failed
cricketers who have occupied the PCB, and their relatives in the PCB
Council and the cricket associations, those who have jobs and
consultancies with sponsor organizations, have a lot to lose if we
change our domestic cricket structure. It’s a classic case of
conflict of interest. Cricket academies, lights and foreign coaches
on whom millions have been wasted never produced world-beaters. If
that were so Bangladesh would be the best team. World Champions are
exclusively the products of their domestic cricket. Our greats were
the products of English counties that helped them hone their skills.
But we cannot wait on the counties any longer. If we don’t revamp our
domestic structure immediately Pakistan cricket is doomed, as
happened in the West Indies, and to our squash and hockey. Even the
West Indian greats were products of the English country system, not
their domestic cricket.”
Why put up lights in a country where so much dew falls and where
hordes of insects get up the nostrils. Our nights are a place for
poets, not cricketers. What’s the point in making expensive indoor
nets when we have such wonderful weather? It makes eminent sense in
cold and rainy England, not here. Why pay more than a lakh daily to a
foreign coach, yet another failed cricketer, when this money could
have been spent on domestic cricket? Matches are won by teams
motivated by a good captain, not coaches and managers. Can you
remember who the coach was when we won the World Cup? There was none.
The sensible thing is to have city teams to give domestic cricket the
cutting edge that will win spectator interest. Older people would
remember how charged Karachi Vs Lahore matches were. Who cares about
MCB Vs Habib Bank? Big yawn! Th ese institutions should sponsor the
top domestic teams, not have them as departments. Imran would emulate
the Australian Shell Shield that is so highly competitive. “It can be
done in months. It doesn’t take rocket science. I would have 18
teams, six each in three leagues, with a relegation system, so that
they are constantly on their toes to avoid being sent down to the
lower tier. Each team would have its own ground. The A-League would
compete in a four-day first class competition. The next two would
play two-day matches of one innings each. All would play one-day
matches. Each team in the A-League would be sponsored by an
institution that would thus get its due publicity. The other 12 would
be supported by PCB, instead of frittering money away on night
lights, indoor nets and academies, coaches domestic and foreign being
paid lakhs by the day.”
Would Imran be willing to take time out and help? He
grimaced. “Perhaps I might give it three or six months with a
Chairman who listens to me. I would select a really competent chief
executive. As I said, it doesn’t take rocket science, just honesty of
purpose and a bit of intelligence.”
As to Inzamam, I have my theory: they should never have made him eat
carrots, a diet fit for rabbits, not for humans who happen to be a
good trenchermen. Inzi must have been too depressed and unhappy to
perform. I know, because I’m fat and when well-wishers make me go on
a diet, Imran being one of them, I get so out of sorts that I can’t
do anything. I don’t even feel like writing. I just feel sorry for
myself. If we had taken young Inzi off the carrots and given him a
paratha or two, he would have scored a century. Imran doubles up
laughing long and loud when I tell him my theory. “Cricketers run on
adrenalin, not on parathas,” he says. When I suggested that losing 33
pounds had caused Inzamam’s centre of gravity to shift from his waist
to his bottom and upset his balance, Imran looked at me askance and
advised me to go on a diet to find out. So I desisted before things
got dangerous and I found myself facing a plateful of carrots. I’m
not a rabbit. I don’t need balance. I’m a writer.
I said that we should lay down eligibility criteria for being a
selector, like having played at least 50 Test matches and one-day
internationals. Imran didn’t scoff at that. Our selection committees
have been headed by a famous former cricketer supported by a couple
of failures who between them may have played around 10 Tests, taken
five wickets and scored a dozen runs, because they will do the
Chairman’s bidding behind the fig leaf of independence. These clapped
out ‘cricketers’ are the most vocal and are surprisingly given a lot
of space and time by our media. True to type, they have appointed
another inconsequential to head the committee inquiring into our
World Cup debacle, possibly because he’s a retired colonel, faujis
being superior to humans.
Captain Nasser Hussein resigned immediately after England failed to
qualify. Our Chairman tenaciously hangs in there, as do the stupid
selectors and captain. What is it about us that we have to be removed
from a job kicking and screaming? It started with Ghulam Mohammed,
remember, who was bundled out of the Governor General’s house on a
pretext and deposited with his daughter? But what’s the point? All
they will do is replace one general with another, or a bureaucrat to
make it look different, not unlike generals replacing politicians who
are then replaced by generals, all sent home packing kicking and
screaming.
The PCB Chairman once said in exasperation that he could write a book
on Wasim Akram’s shenanigans. He must. That’s the only way he can go
down in history, as the man who wrote a book on the great man’s
shenanigans and tantrums. Remember who the Chairman was in 1992? But
we all remember the captain. If only he had written a book on Imran
Khan.
E-mail queries and comments to: hgauhar@n…

Our beloved heros encircle Tauqir Zia. :smiley: Accordin’ to Tauqir Zia, Miandad offered his help to the team, which was rejected by the players. :rolleyes: No wonder, we’re in deep mess.

Pak players want Tauqir to accept responsibility for World Cup loss

  • *Today’s press conference by Captain Waqar, Inzamam, Wasim and manager Shaharyar to prove crucial for country’s cricket future. * :smack:

DUBAI: The Chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Lt. General Tauqir Zia has asked the senior players of the failed World Cup campaign to voluntarilty announce their retirements but some of them are reluctant to take the entire blame for the disappointing result at the mega event.

“The News” has gathered from different sources that the senior players including Wasim Akram, Inzamamul Haq, Rashid Latif, Saeed Anwar, Yousuf Youhana, Saqlain Mushtaq, etc believe that chairman should also accept the responsibility for not listening to them and persisting with Waqar Younis as captain in the World Cup.

“The players don’t agree with the chairman’s assertion that they are entirely to blame for the failed campaign and argue the chairman should have listened to them and not made Waqar the captain,” one source said.

Tauqir Zia has said repeatedly that he only retained Waqar as captain for the World Cup after the players assured him they would support the fast bowler.

“But the seniors claim that this is not correct. They only agreed to go along with the General’s decision after he had told them Waqar would not be changed as captain,” one source stated.

A lot of significance is being attached to the press conference to be addressed by Captain Waqar Younis, deputy Inzamamul Haq, Wasim Akram and manager Shaharyar Khan in Lahore on Monday on the failed World Cup campaign and there is some anticipation that some of the players including Waqar might announce their retirement to pave the way for the Pakistan Cricket Board and its selectors to start a rebuilding process of the team beginning with the triangular series in Sharjah from April 1.

However, it is learnt that in the next few days Tauqir Zia will be walking a tightrope and will have to take some hard decisions even for the senior players in the World Cup side as there are strong indications that most of them have decided to resist announcing their retirements and want to be part of the rebuilding process after the World Cup.

**“Seniors like Wasim, Saeed (Anwar), Yousaf Youhana, Rashid Latif, Saqlain Mushtaq and Inzamam all held long meetings in Bulawayo and Johannesburg before returning home and apparently they decided on a game plan to counter the backlash expected from the failed World Cup campaign,” ** a source close to the team said.

“They believe that Wasim can lead the team for an interim period and the chairman of the board should be convinced this is best for the cricket team and it should not be destroyed on the altar of experiments,” the source said.

“This is one reason why none of them announced their retirements in the World Cup although after the failed campaign this was what the Pakistani people were expecting of them,” the source said.

He pointed out that even someone like Rashid Latif who has already announced his retirement from Test cricket and said before the World Cup he would also retire from one-dayers after the event has now changed his plans.

With lot of names now being mentioned to take over as captain, coach and manager, the source said the next few days will bring to light the familiar situation of a tussle between the players and the board over the future course of action.

**"The seniors are convinced that they should not take the entire blame for the failed campaign in South Africa as the chairman made his own choice as captain against their wishes.

Then, most of the support players also did not deliver including Abdul Razzaq, Saqlain Mushtaq and Shahid Afridi and also that the Board chairman excessively pampered some players, specially Shoaib Akhtar which didn’t go down well with the others."

"Shoaib is a sore point for most of the senior players because of his attitude and different set of rules. In fact during a meeting with the chairman before the World Cup, Shoaib had told Tauqir Zia point blank that he could not work with Pybus and he will not listen to him.

Over this reaction of the ‘Rawalpindi Express’, Inzamam got upset and told the chairman that either he sack Shoaib or the coach as this was a scenario in which the team could not deliver results in the World Cup,"** the source informed.

“The players feel that Shoaib is as much to blame for the failed campaign as he let the team down badly in all the big matches,” the source continued.

The source said the new scenario of the seniors ganging up together was expected as in the World Cup, they had difference of opinion with Waqar on a couple of occasion on the selection of the playing eleven.

**"Before the game against Australia the seniors wanted Saqlain to play but Waqar differed. Before the game against India, the feeling was that Waqar should rest himself and allow Saqlain and Muhammad Sami to play to which again there was disagreement.

“During the match against Holland, the coach Richard Pybus also wanted to rotate the players and give a chance to Sami and Azhar Mehmood but Waqar refused to listen to him. In short there were differences off opinion on the team selections throughout the World Cup,” ** the source said.

“After the Holland match, Pybus in fact said he wondered what he was doing as coach of the Pakistan team,” a source said.

However, about one thing there is no doubt that before going to South Africa all the players had agreed to support Waqar as their captain in a long meeting with the chairman, one reason why Tauqir was so confident that everything would fall into place in the World Cup and the seniors would give their best."

“But the players agreed only after the Board made it clear Waqar was to stay as captain. And they all did cooperate with him but everyone knows his selection had imbalanced the whole team which never settled down,” said one source.

One person who is seen as a prime candidate to take over as coach or even coach cum captain before the Sharjah tournament, Javed Miandad when contacted in Dubai said he was disheartened with the whole scenario.

…Continue…

**“It is so depressing what is happening. Right now I don’t think it is a question of the seniors deciding to retire or not. The ball is now in the Board’s court to take a decision on behalf of the seniors and decide what they want to do for the future – either discard the seniors or again repose some trust in them,” ** Miandad said.

He pointed out that in Pakistan cricket there were few examples of players leaving at the right time. “Look in the past and you will see most of the players just faded away after being ignored by the selectors,” :mad: he said.

But he made it clear that the Board had not approached or spoken to him on the possibility of making a comeback as coach or coach cum playing member of a new look team for the Sharjah tournament. “No one has said anything to me.”

But Miandad said the people should realize that nowhere in the cricket world were Boards and officials criticised for a team’s bad performance. “The media always focusses on the weak points and problems of the team and South Africa is a glaring example of this,” he said.

Tauqir it seems has made up his mind as have the selectors to go for a entirely new look side for the Sharjah tournament but the catch-22 situation they are facing is who to bring in as captain.

“They know if they decide to go back to Moin Khan, or promote Inzamam or even ask Wasim to continue for an interim period this is not going to work if they want Javed Miandad as coach,” the source said.

**"Tauqir also has to rely heavily on the feedback from the manager Shaharyar Khan who, ironically, does not see anyone in the team apart from Wasim, Moin and Rashid capable of leading the team even for an interim period.

"Shaharyar has no doubt that Waqar has to go. But he also believes that there is no other young player in the team who can be made captain and believes the solution lies in having an interim appointment and then grooming a captain under his wings for the next one year,'** the source said.

**For Tauqir the problem with an interim captain is that Miandad has never seen eye to eye with either Wasim, Inzi or Moin.’

“Even before the World Cup Miandad had offered his services as batting consultant for the team but most of the players refused to accept him when Tauqir spoke to them.”

“So basically, if Miandad is to come in it would have to be either as coach cum playing captain with a new team under him or at the most have Rashid as captain because he gets along with him,”** the source explained.

“The other choice as coach is Mushtaq Muhammad who has a good relationship with Wasim, Moin, Rashid and all the other players and did a good job in his previous tenures as coach.”

However, the general feedback is that Tauqir would do well to start with a clean slate because when the seniors like Wasim, Waqar, Inzi could not deliver in the World Cup how can it be guaranteed they will do it again in the near future.

“Pick up the records from the last two years and see how the senior bowlers have delivered. They get wickets with the new ball but are just not capable of running through the stronger sides any longer even in One-dayers. Gone are the days when they used reverse swing to get their wickets. Nowadays the umpires frequently change the balls during the innings and this has robbed them of the ability to take late order wickets,” said one former Test player.

“The seniors are now talking about wanting to do something for the country but what stopped them from delivering in the last few months or the World Cup?” :konfused: he asked.

But all said and done the one key point Tauqir and the selectors will have to focus on is that they should not make scapegoats of some of the senior players and if they do decide a rebuilding process then they have to keep faith with the players for alteast a year.

“What has happened in the past should not happen again when just one or two defeats led to Tauqir and the selectors pressing the panic button. That should not happen again. Give the youngsters a proper chance and also work sincerely on the academies programme to have a lot of players ready to take over from out-of-form or unfit players,” the former player stated.

The blame lies totally with Tauqeer Zia. Why? Because he is a soldier and not a cricketer unlike Waqar or Pybus.

I have no doubt that Waqar will be sacked, and Pybus will also go. Somehow I suspect that the chief head of cricket will remain some goose-stepping moustachioe’d General Moron however.

Carry on Sah!! :soldier:

Has Pybus ever played Cricket in his life?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Has Pybus ever played Cricket in his life?
[/QUOTE]

Well if he hasn't why do General Tauqir and co. keep selecting him as coach? this is his 3rd stint I believe. So 3 times our PCB authorities have endorsed Pybus's qualifications. So you tell me where the buck stops?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Has Pybus ever played Cricket in his life?
[/QUOTE]

No his only qualification is that he is GORA and is very articulate.

I already know Pybus never played Cricket in his life. Just wanted to know if you guys knew about it. Pybus was appointed as a Team Assistant during 99 WC and then promoted as a Coach afterwards. This is the most stupid decision ever Gen. Tauqir Zia made!

FIRED HIM!

I think Javed Miandad should be brought back as the coach of the Pakistani and the players who can't along with him, Hellll with them! Pakistan played well under Javed Miandad and he knows how to handle young players, like Afridi. Untill Javed was the coach, he played well. With Mohammad Sami, and most likely some other youongsters coming into the team, I think Javed Miandad would be the best option to groom those youngsters, instead of bringing in another idiot just so Wasim can play another year or Moin could be brought back.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
Has Pybus ever played Cricket in his life?
[/QUOTE]

Pybus has a professional degree or certificate or whatever in Cricket coaching. the only qualification he had.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *
I already know Pybus never played Cricket in his life. Just wanted to know if you guys knew about it. Pybus was appointed as a Team Assistant during 99 WC and then promoted as a Coach afterwards. This is the most stupid decision ever Gen. Tauqir Zia made!

FIRED HIM!
[/QUOTE]

PT yaar, no doubt he was assistant coach in WC 99 but this is known and confessed statement by then-coach Mushtaq Mohamamd that main thinktank of the team were Wasim-Pybus Duo. Mushtaq was a mere spectator.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Pakistani Tiger: *

**For Tauqir the problem with an interim captain is that Miandad has never seen eye to eye with either Wasim, Inzi or Moin.'

"Even before the World Cup Miandad had offered his services as batting consultant for the team but most of the players refused to accept him when Tauqir spoke to them."

"So basically, if Miandad is to come in it would have to be either as coach cum playing captain with a new team under him or at the most have Rashid as captain because he gets along with him,"** the source explained.

[/QUOTE]

That is exactly the reason i fear bringing Miandad as coach would lead to further chaos God Forbid. Moin specially has a terrible history with Miandad in his two previuos stints as coach. Wasim for Pakistan's sake might go along with him, and Rashid well for the sole purpose of bringing Miandad as coach would be the best choice. and i thik that will ba hit duo.

P.S Though i dont believe this Waheed Hussain that much But one thing is for sure, coming days will be nothing less then intersting, dramatic and extremely important for Pakistan cricket. Pakistan Cricket is on cross roads defintely. Tauqir Zia definitely panicked when Pakistan was troucned by Australia in jnauary 2000 and he dropped so many youngsters that brought a series loss to sri lanka at home in both Odi's and tests and he had to repose trust in seniors. This time around it should be a mixture of seniors and juniors and i m sure Wasim, Miandad or Rashid All will tolearate each other for an year just for the sake of Pakistan.

I see people talking about Wasim should be made captain and he should not retire. Well I don’t agree with this at all. Akram can play for another 1 or 2 years after that he will be in the same shoe as Waqar is now. The only reason Wasim is thinking of not retiring cuz he sees an opportunity to make money and he dcided to stay for a while. Its all bullsh*t that he feel for the PAK Cricket team and what ever his reason is to stick around for a while. PAK needs a good stable captain who can lead the team for next 4 to 5 years and this is a good time to pick someone who can become a good captain in the next coming years not someone who is going to retire after few years and leave the team in the same sinking boat.

And for Wasim, Waqar, Saeed, Rashid I would say this is the best time for them to retire thats if they want to retire with pride and they will be doing a big favour to the country and PAK team by doing so cuz then the youngsters will get a chance.

P.S. If Wasim feels PAK team will be in a mess after his retirement than he should retire and be part of the coaching team and pass on the tricks he learned from his seniors to the youngsters instead of heading to USA and setting up a coaching camp in USA. Something like what Aqib Javaid is doing :k: recently PAK under 19 was on some tour don’t remember which one and their performance was excellent under Aqib Javaid :k:

Miandad was a brilliant player, but he was never a team man. This process of having different camps in the squad has to stop. If that means forcefully retiring the old guard then that's what has to happen. Wasim is the best choice as an interim captain, and the only one I would consider capable of grooming a new team. Waqar is finished, Saeed has only a short term future and his inclusion will prevent the development of players like Elahi and Taufeeq who have done well when given the chance. Rashid still looks good and if he stays is not really a big issue if the captain wants to keep him. Wicketkeepers can go on a lot longer than bowlers or batsmen.