WC Points Table

[Decent_6Chora]

Re: WC Points Table

@GoldenAsif

This format has one major drawback. A team that has won all of its group games incl. three good wins against top sides in their respective groups (India, NZ) could potentially lose to a lesser team that has qualified by merely beating the minnows in their respective groups (England, Pak) & go out of the World Cup at the QF stage!!

How about Sachin’s proposed idea of 25 teams with the aim to globalise the sport.

My proposed model
5 teams split into 5 groups A to E i.e. 4 games each for every team in groups A to E. Top two from each group qualify for super ten
10 super ten teams split into two groups (F & G) of 5 each. Each team in F plays against each team in G and vice versa i.e. **5 games each
**Top 4 in super ten qualify for the SFs; 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3
Final

i.e. the finalists will have played 11 games (rather than 9 as with the current format)

To many games. I guess. (50+15+2+1=68 games)

Id rather have 10 countries playing each other and top two playing best of 3 (45+3=48 games)

To give associates chance at WC, lets have a cut-of date and last two full members on that cutoff date play with associates for qualification.

and for globalization sake, we can increase number of teams in T20 WC.