Virgins need not apply

Muzna · January 27, 2010, 6:48pm

I haven’t anywhere suggested that the words you are using are inaccurate. I am merely asking what need there is to be as graphic as you are being.

Again…the way we communicate with each other is a reflection of who we are…so whatever rocks your boat.

Eye4Eye · January 27, 2010, 8:42pm

All you had to say was it’s your opinion.

Muzna · January 27, 2010, 8:47pm

Didn’t I?

See the communication gap now?

funguy · January 27, 2010, 8:48pm

Re: Virgins need not apply

May be Eye4Eye should spread his eyes a little, not too much now.

X2 · January 28, 2010, 2:22am

Re: Virgins need not apply

fg you spelled it wrong..or did you really mean eyes?

X2 · January 28, 2010, 2:24am

nope, circumstances are an enabler, but do 2 people wondering the same level in same circumstances act or act at the same level? nope, and its because they are distinct individuals with varying levels of morals, self control, sense of right and wrong, etc etc

funguy · January 28, 2010, 3:06am

Re: Virgins need not apply

I thought they would edit ‘ass’ so I typed eyes.

PhatBalongri · January 28, 2010, 4:40am

Re: Virgins need not apply

I am a girl and wouldn’t take damaged goods.

Ok just kidding.

Jaanwar · January 28, 2010, 5:43am

Eye4Eye · January 28, 2010, 3:33pm

Then you should’ve realized by now I can care less about your opinion. Yup, I see the communication gap clearly.

Muzna · January 28, 2010, 4:37pm

then why do you keep responding to it?

NaMaan · January 28, 2010, 6:11pm

Re: Virgins need not apply

[note] Discussion over . Thank you every one for their useful input . [/note]