USA 2004 Elections

Finally, a list of accomplishments of the past 4 years compiled by conservative’s favorite columnist, Molly Ivins. Does George II deserve another term?

It’s the little things, folks

Seems like every group and its hamster has put out some kind of dossier on the past four years. Top Bush Lies. One Hundred Mistakes Bush Could Admit To. Best Scandals. Biggest Bush Flip-Flops. Iraq. The Economy. The Environment.

Corporate Pork and Payoffs Galore. Homeland Insecurity. The Deficit. On and on it goes.

But I like to remember the little things, those itty-bitty things that really made it special. Those touches of style. The je ne sais quoi of it all.

Like choosing Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday to announce that his administration would oppose affirmative action in the University of Michigan case, calling it “divisive,” “unfair” and “unconstitutional.” Classy timing.

Of course, George W. Bush (Andover, Yale, Delta Kappa Epsilon, Harvard Business, three failed oil companies rescued by Daddy’s friends, set up by Daddy’s friends in baseball and given a huge cut for a tiny investment) never experienced affirmative action in his life. Made it all on his own, pulled himself up by his bootstraps. Black people can do it, too.

Timing is kind of a Bush specialty. In February 2001, the day that a major earthquake hit the Northwest, Bush killed a federal program designed to help communities deal with the effects of natural disasters. Of course, Florida in an election year – different story.

Remember when he went to visit the rescued miners from Quecreek, Pa.? It was a great photo op. Except the year before, Bush had cut the mine safety budget, halted regulatory improvements and reduced enforcement of safety standards. The Department of Labor stopped work on more than a dozen mine safety regulations from the Clinton years. But hey, Bush was really glad that those nine guys made it out alive. And what a photo op it was.

You probably don’t remember the time he visited the Youth Opportunity Center, a job training site in Portland, Ore. Hailed it as a model, praised the center and its staff. A month later, he cut it out of the budget.

Here’s one of my faves:

In his big State of the Union address of 2002, Bush said: “A good job should lead to security in retirement. I ask Congress to enact new safeguards for 401(k) and pension plans.”

The Bush plan allows companies to switch from traditional fixed-benefit plans to what’s called cash-balance plans. It saves corporations millions a year – in the case of large companies, as much as $100 million. Older workers can lose up to 50 percent of their pensions.

The Bush rules not only permit the conversions – they also give cash-balance plans a tax advantage, as well as protection from age discrimination lawsuits. It’s the perfect Bush plan: Corporations get to bilk workers, and they get a tax break for it – plus, nobody can sue.

Nobody paid any attention to this one except the beneficiaries, since it was during the Iraq war:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission – the one that laid the groundwork for Enron and is supposed to protect investors from abusive practices – passed three new rules in March 2003. According to The New York Times, the rules “reduce the quality of disclosure required in reports of past performance, increase the opportunity for advisers to put some clients’ or their own interest ahead of others and curtail the already lax regulation on operators of hedge funds.”

Hedge funds are derivatives on steroids, and the near-collapse of one hedge fund, Long Term Capital Management, nearly caused the financial equivalent of “the China syndrome.” Alan Greenspan and Fed officials convinced bankers to join the LTCM rescue effort only when they pointed out that failure would result in “chaos” in financial markets and could damage economic growth worldwide. Less regulation, you bet.

Bait-and-switch is a constant Bush tactic. Right after 9-11, Bush went to ground zero, threw his arm around a firefighter and assured him and other rescue workers that he was with them. It was the photo op seen 'round the world and was endlessly resurrected at the Republican convention.

Except in August 2002, Bush pocket-vetoed $150 million in emergency grants for first-responders. The New York firefighters never got their money.

I have so many other favorite moments. Hilarious promises like $15 billion for AIDS in Africa. Those amusing judicial nominations, so bad that even the spineless Democrats finally had to filibuster. All the precious photo ops with the little children of color just before he squashed some other program to help them.

It’s been a ball. But I’ve had enough.

Now please tell me why a British newspaper is in the US doing a get out the vote campaign against Bush. Please do not ever pretend to tell me again that the Guardain is anything other than a mouthpiece for the left!

Guardian calls it quits in Clark County fiasco
By David Rennie in Youngstown
(Filed: 22/10/2004)

The Guardian yesterday ran up the white flag and called a halt to “Operation Clark County”, the newspaper’s ambitious scheme to recruit thousands of readers to persuade American voters in a swing state to kick out President George W Bush in next month’s election.

The cancellation of the project came 24 hours after the first of some 14,000 letters from Guardian readers began arriving in Clark County. The missives led to widespread complaints about foreign interference in a US election.

It also prompted a surge of indignant local voters calling the county’s Republican party offering to volunteer for Mr Bush.

The paper said it had closed the website where readers collected an address to write to and had abandoned plans to take four “winners” to visit voters in Clark County. Instead, the group would be taken to the “more tranquil” area of Washington.

Albert Scardino, the paper’s executive editor for news, simultaneously denied and conceded that an early halt had been called to the project. “It is roaringly, successfully completed. It has been an overwhelming triumph,” he said.

He then acknowledged that no more addresses were being distributed, blaming attacks on The Guardian website by Right-wing hackers.

“If we had not had the technical problem of the assault we would have completed the distribution of names in orderly fashion,” he said. “We were able to give fewer addresses [of voters in Clark County] than we hoped. There were 14,000 names and addresses sent out. We would like to have made it possible to reach another 42,000 people.”

The scheme seemed to backfired from the start as the reactions of the first recipients varied from indifference to anger and even alarm.

The surrender was announced in a lengthy “mea culpa” by Ian Katz, the G2 editor at The Guardian, who dreamed up the scheme.

He began with a lengthy denunciation of the American Right for over-reacting to his scheme, and painted his project as the victim of its own success, after many thousands of readers wrote to Clark County voters.

Further down the piece it became clear that Mr Katz was calling it quits. “Somewhere along the line, though, the good-humoured spirit of the enterprise got lost in translation,” he wrote.

There had been mounting evidence that urging foreigners to send anti-Bush letters to Clark County - an isolated slice of the rural mid-West - was only hurting Senator John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate.

One senior local politician, speaking off the record to avoid offending his neighbours, said: “They picked the wrong county for many reasons. One is, we’re very parochial. When people talk about The Guardian of London, they think you mean London, Ohio, which is in the next-door county. Another is, we have some issues with literacy round here.”

Mr Katz acknowledged that an ever-growing number of Democrats, among them Sharon Manitta, the spokesman in Britain for Democrats Abroad, tried warning The Guardian: “This will certainly garner more votes for George Bush.”

Mr Katz wrote yesterday that the paper had considered the possibility, but “we didn’t believe it”. He insisted: “Folks in Clark County itself have best recognised the spirit of the enterprise. Local media coverage has been consistently fair and good humoured.”

“Good-humoured” headlines in the local newspaper, the Springfield News-Sun have included “Butt Out Brits, voters say” and “Trashing letter campaign” - a reference to the fact that the first woman to receive a letter from a Guardian reader, Beverly Coale, threw it away, fearing it was from a terrorist.

Karen Henschen, a member of the executive committee of the Clark County Democratic party, said scrapping the project was “probably the best thing they could do”.

The end of the scheme comes as a relief to Linda Rosicka, the director of the Clark County board of elections, who has been fielding dozens of interview requests from the world’s media.

Yet there is one last Guardian letter Mrs Rosicka would still like to see - one containing a cheque for $25 (about £13), which the newspaper still owes her for its purchase of the county’s electoral roll.

“I was nice and made the file available, because their reporter said he was right on deadline,” she said. “They said the cheque is in the mail. As of this morning, it still hasn’t arrived, and it’s been more than a week.”

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ohioguy: *
Now please tell me why a British newspaper is in the US doing a get out the vote campaign against Bush.
[/QUOTE]
Because they are concerned that his presidency is a danger to the whole world?

Other than a little law that says that foreigners engaging in electoral/lobbying activities must be registered as foreign agents! They should be indicted... Sort of screws with the integrity of the process, pull their visas and Patriot Act the little buggers! Where is Ashcroft when you need him?

If they have some suggestions for the American people they can publish them... Even AMERICAN papers understand the role of journalists in an election. I say we send Rush Limbaugh to England for a while to screw with their elections!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Ohioguy: *
I say we send Rush Limbaugh to England for a while to screw with their elections!
[/QUOTE]

He'll do anything for some pills.

Some manipulated human machines operating has been reported at FL, any one posted that HERE?!

some good news for kerry …

US Washington Post backs Kerry
John Kerry in New Mexico
The Post backed Kerry, but questioned his decisiveness
US presidential candidate John Kerry has received the official backing of the influential Washington Post.

The paper said the choice was difficult, but that Mr Kerry had the “better approach” on many policies.

The New York Times has already backed the Democrat while papers in Texas and Chicago have endorsed George W Bush.

On Sunday, President George W Bush is campaigning in New Mexico and Texas, while Mr Kerry moves from Florida to New Hampshire.

‘Election amnesia’

The Washington Post said: “We believe Mr Kerry, with his promise of resoluteness tempered by wisdom and open-mindedness, has staked a stronger claim on the nation’s trust to lead for the next four years.”

George Bush on the campaign trail

Q&A: Swing states

It accused Mr Bush of “wilful indifference” towards pre-Iraq war intelligence and called his financial policies “reckless”.

However, it also questioned whether Mr Kerry would be decisive enough in power, given his “zigzags” over Iraq policies.

In the latest campaigning, Mr Bush sought to highlight that issue in Jacksonville, Florida, where he mocked Mr Kerry for first voting for the Iraq conflict and then calling it the “wrong war”.

“Senator Kerry seems to have forgotten all that, as his position has evolved during the course of the campaign. You might call it election amnesia,” Mr Bush said.

Vice-President Dick Cheney, in New Mexico, said the Soviet Union might still exist and Saddam Hussein might be dominating the Gulf if Mr Kerry had been president in recent years.

Mr Kerry was in Colorado on Saturday, telling voters: “Vote your hopes, not the fears that George Bush wants you to feel.” He later campaigned in New Mexico.

New campaign ads

In addition to the Washington Post endorsement, Mr Kerry has also won the backing of leaders of America’s seven million strong Muslim community.

A Bush supporter in Cocoa Beach, Florida
A Florida Republican with a “W” Mohican for George W Bush

However, the American Muslim Taskforce on Civil Rights and Elections said the vote for Mr Kerry should be a “protest vote” against the Bush administration.

It said it had “disagreements with Senator Kerry on some domestic and international issues” and criticised him for failing to commit to a broad civil rights agenda.

Both parties have unveiled new ads to attack their opponents.

Mr Bush’s shows a pack of wolves prowling menacingly on screen as a female narrator accuses Mr Kerry of being dangerously weak on national security.

Democrat vice-presidential candidate John Edwards described it as a despicable and contemptible attempt to scare Americans.

For their part, the Democrats liken George Bush to an ostrich, with his head in the sand, while comparing Mr Kerry to a soaring eagle.

Election day is 2 November, although millions of voters have already cast their ballots.

About 30 states allow early or absentee votes.

A total of 1.3m Americans had voted in eight battleground states as of Friday, the Washington Post reported.

Some good News for Bush:

Hail, Human Fraud Machines!

electoral-vote.com is putting kerry at 298, bush at 231 a day before elections
[thumb=H]116455_2375603.JPG[/thumb]

mydd has kerry at 291, bush at 241
[thumb=H]216455_4208349.JPG[/thumb]

I wa watching SKY NEWS and they had an interesting superstition to present. In last 18 elections, whenever Washington Red Skins lost last home game before the elections, whitehouse witnessed a change in presidenct. They lost this time too. :rolleyes: Now what is up with that?