**** for an update, see the blue text at the end of this post **
Someone I know just got his student US visa rejected this weekend. He already has a valid visitor’s visa to the USA till 2005, he just came back from the USA a couple months ago, he was gone visiting.
He had gotten into one of the top 10 business schools in the US for an MBA, and his funding and everything was all sorted out.
He’s still going to try and appeal and reapply etc. Abt the interview procedure at the US embassy in Islamabad he said the interview was only 1 minute long, the guy taking the interview didn’t even look at his whole application, just looked at the first page, and you can’t even speak extra at the interview and volunteer extraneous info, so he doesn’t even know if the interviewer even knew that he has a valid visitor’s visa. He basically asked him why he was going for his studies there, what job he does here, and things like that. Then the interviewer did something on his computer for half a minute and then immediately told him “Sorry…Thanks for applying…but…”
The guy’s not showing that he’s affected but it must be tough to accept coz he was reallly counting on it and had worked hard to get into that school, getting into one of the top MBA programs in the USA is not easy!
He was saying that all the guys who he met that day at the embassy got their visas rejected, he didn’t meet a single guy whose visa got accepted.
Another friend’s parents had applied for an official tour sponsored by their employer company. The trip was fully planned and their family is very well settled in Pakistan. The uncle has gone to college in the USA too. They also got rejected.
There are people though who’s visas are also being accepted. I’ve heard of such cases too. But the number of acceptances has sharply declined.
The mind boggling thing though is, what criteria are they using? And granted they have the sovereign authority to grant visas but wouldn’t it be a bit nice, a bit humane, if they could provide atleast some explanation about the reasons for rejection, and shed some light on the strategy they are using, if they are using one at all, to decide who to give visas to and who not to. The whole process seems so arbitrary, almost completely random.
edited after approx 3 weeks of the original post: **so the person i was talking abt in my original post above 3 wks ago reapplied for the visa immediately, got a walk in interview, and ended up getting the visa last week. i havent had a chance to speak to him yet abt the process he went thru in detail but just found out that he’s gotten the visa now.
he has to undergo further background checks tho that might take a month to one yr. i heard that basically in this they check his record of whether his last name matches that of any terrorist and if so if they r related.**