I dont think many people except ethnic Nationalists think that Urdu is a negative thing. Ethnic nationalists would rather see english as a national language - why should we have english? At least urdu is native to south asia.
If there was no urdu the illiterate man of Pakistan would find it very hard to communicate his pashtu, punjabi, seraiki, sindhi, baloch, brahui, kho, burushashki, kohistani, kashmiri, shina, gujari, wakhi. The illiterate people would never be able to learn English.
What else could be the national language of pakistan? Persian, Arabic? Persian would have been perfect as so much of south asian muslim historry rests upon persian - one of the major influences on Urdu.
the 2 most commonly spoken languages are Punjabi and Seraiki - if they were forced to be the national language of Pakistan even more would complain.
Urdu is a good national language because of its neutrality within Pakistan pre-1947 - it was nt spoken by any of the sons of the soil ethhnic groups so at least there was no favouritism there. Also it had developed a role after persian as a language Indian muslims could identify with. Urdu is very similar to Hindi so in a way it became a strong regional language and today it is understood from Afghanistan east to Bangaldesh.
I find urdu as an extremely excellent language for cross cultural communication within pakistan. regardless of people complaining about it being imposed i am pretty much sure those same very people take advantage of the benefits of urdu.
Pakistan would be hell if each and every person demanded you spoke their mother tongue with them.
I think it is a perfect thing that the provinces have urdu imposed upon them.
Look at Balochistan - the 3 languages which have the highest numbers of speakers are Balochi, Brahui and pashtu. In Quetta all 3 groups use urdu as a language to communicate with each other. **
**Imagine if Balochi was imposed on Balochistan - its not even spoken by 40% of the population. the Brahui and Pashtuns wont be happy at all. On top of that a considerable amount in balochistan speak punjabi, persian, Mekrani, Seraiki/khetrani....
Look at NWFP.......70-80% speaks pashtu but still a good number speak hindko, chitral speaks kho, seraiki is spoken in eastern d i khan......
which language do you impose there? if there was no urdu then many would be forced to learn pashtu
in punjab...punjabi, seraiki, potohar are spoken......which language would you impose there? almost half of punjab may even speak seraiki..if not more....
in sindh...sindhi and urdu are both spoken....sindhi is spoken more widely......other languages spoken include balochi, thari, kachi, and with recent immigration punjabi and pashtu......fair enough sindhi nationalists claim that sindhiis the historical language of sindh but demographics change and one should look at present day situations......
i do believe that mother tongues should be taught in schools theres nothing wrong with that but we cant have regional parilaments where people are not understanding each other.
Punjabis and pashtns are mobile people and you get them everywhere in pakistan migrating looking for work....they benefit from urdu a lot......
Urdu makes pakistan a lot easier for us....we dont need to be like india where english a distant language is used for communication when we have a local desi substitute....
i found urdu very useful travelling around different areas within pakistan......if people dont want to use urdu or dislike it....then dont use it full stop.,..it wil only harm you thogh
I would say that Quetta is different..It's as if every one understands each other. You can talk brahui/balochi to a pashtun and he will understand it. He will perhaps reply in Pashto and that's also understood vice versa. There are many languages and dialects in Quetta and people have neighbours who are of different language...as times goes by the languages are picked up. I've also seen it from my Punjabi friends in Quetta who are fluent in Brahui and Pashto as I understand them when speaking in Punjabi