Why is PTI anti former chief justice of Pakistan Iftikhar Choudhary?
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI’s murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
LOL @ “Hum ne iss liye nahin dikhaya ke hum nahein samajh te ke iss tarah ke cheezen dhikayi jaani chahihein” after 7:13
Lekin agar kal ki baat ho … phir sara kuch chalta hai … 
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
So what was the word Arsalaan used that caused the fight.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI’s murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
may be he said ... "cricket player"
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
No something with a B like British or something.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Ah ... he said "play boy"
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
O okay.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Ah ... he said "play boy"
Not something one lays a hand over on A. Iftikhar, when the PTI guy didn't deny that imran called arsalan corrupt and shehzada (ok, prince might be a compliment .. :D ). PTI guys need to chill.
At least one thing is clear i.e. you can't blame just karachi and MQM anymore, as it seems PTI, the governing party of KP, has a messiah complex as well.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI’s murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Like father like son both were proven corrupts. He visited foreign countries to f the whores and spent 4 millions paid by some one else to get his case through in his father’s court. Pakion ko koi sharam haya hay ke nahin. chori aor phir seena zori, yeh sirf badmaashi pakion main dekhi hay. Had they done in foreign country, they would have been still in jails for their crimes.
parhta ja aor sharmata ja. He was given highest post as his father was pet dog of NS, nothing more nothing less. Imran Khan is far superior person than this low lying bloody pimp of Hira Mandhi.
Islamabad: The following is the open letter to Chief Justice of Pakistan Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry from Supreme Court advocate Naeem Bokhari.
Mr. Justice Iftikhar Mohammad Chaudhry
Chief Justice
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Islamabad
Subject: Open letter to the Chief Justice of Pakistan
My Lord,
I write this letter as an Officer of the Supreme Court, as an Advocate enrolled in the apex court since 1984 and in the High Courts since 1972, as an Attorney who has paid more income tax from his earnings in the legal profession than many of my friends, colleagues and seniors elevated to the Bench and as a stake holder in the dispensation of justice, intimately and vitally interested in the functioning of the Supreme Court.
Many judges who adorn the Bench in the Supreme Court and the High Court know me over decades, as a person endowed by nature with a pleasant disposition and acceptance of human failings. Towards the courts, my approach has always been of consistent and continuous display of respect and humility. I bow out of conviction, not compulsion. I use the words “My Lords”, because I want to, not because I have to. As an Attorney, I look up to the court and want to see it on a high pedestal of dignity, compassion and justice, tempered with mercy.
I have seen my Supreme Court headed by Justice Hamood-ur-Rehman, Justice Yaqoob Ali Khan, Justice S. Anwar-ul-Haq, Justice Haleem Ahmed and how the court functioned under them in the seventies / eighties.
I witnessed the proceedings for the ouster of Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, became aware that the then Prime Minister of Pakistan had ‘worked’ on some judges of the Supreme Court and saw the physical assault on the court.
I was appalled at the manner in which Justice Irshad Hasan Khan led the Supreme Court and pained at the insinuations against Justice Sheikh Riaz, when he was the Chief Justice.
I was horrified by the establishment of a Bench of five judges constituted by Justice Nazim Hussain Siddiqui to determine whether reduction in the retirement age for judges was constitutional or not. This was clearly designed to block your appointment. I was against the idea of Mr. Amirul Mulk Mengal being made the Chief Justice before you. Within the limits of my influence (which I readily admit to be very limited), I was totally for you to become the Chief Justice. Justice Javed Buttar is aware of my position, as is the Attorney General for Pakistan. The accelerated issue of the notification appointing you the Chief Justice put Justice Siddiqui’s move to rest.
I believed that you were vigorous, capable of lifting up the Supreme Court, creating an espirit-de-corps among your brother judges, restoring the dignity and grandeur of the apex court, particularly considering the long tenure before you.
Alas this has not come about.
I am not perturbed by your insistence on protocol (despite my belief that the Chief Justice would rise in the eyes of everybody if he walked from his residence to the court and hooters, police escort, flags is just fluff not the substance of an office).
I am mildly amused at your desire to be presented a guard of honour in Peshawar. I am titillated by the appropriation of Mercedes Benz car or is it cars, the use of the Government of the Punjab’s plane to offer Fateha in Multan, to Sheikhupura for Fateha on a Government of the Punjab helicopter, to Hyderabad on a Government of the Sind’s plane for attending a High Court function, the huge amount spent in refurbishing the chamber and residence of the Chief Justice, the reservation for yourself of a wing in Supreme Court Judges guest house in Lahore, the permanent occupation by the Supreme Court of the official residence of the Chief Justice of Sind, who per force lives in the basement of his father’s house. As his class fellow in the Government College, Lahore, I can vouch that living in the basement will do him no harm.
**I am not perturbed that Dr. Arsalaan (your son) secured 16/100 in the English paper for the Civil Services Examination, that there is some case against him in some court in Baluchistan, that from the Health Department in Baluchistan he has shifted to FIA, that he has obtained training in the Police Academy, that he reportedly drives a BMW 7-Series car, that there is a complaint against him with the National Accountability Bureau.
**
My grievances and protests are different.
I am perturbed that the Supreme Court should issue a clarificatory statement on his behalf. I am perturbed that Justice (Retd.) Wajihuddin Ahmed should be constrained to advise you on television that “people who live in glass houses should not throw stones at others”. I am perturbed that the Chief Justice should summon Mir Shakeel-ur-Rehman to his chambers on Dr. Arsalaan’s account.
I am appalled that you announce decisions in Court, while in the written judgment an opposite conclusion is recorded.
In the Petition for leave to appeal filed by Dr Sher Afghan Niazi, Federal Minister for Parliamentary Affairs (in which Respondent’s Counsel were Mr Khalid Anwar and Mr Qadir Saeed), you refused to grant leave in open Court and yet in the written order, leave was granted to Dr Sher Afghan Niazi.
On 15.2.2007, Mr Fakurddin G. Ebrahim complained that, in open Court you had accepted his appeal but dismissed the same in the judgement, subsequently recorded.
If Mr Khalid Anwar, a former Minister of Law and Parliamentary Affairs and Mr Fakrhuddin, Senior Counsel are treated in this manner, the fate of lesser known lawyers would certainly be far worse.
My grievances also concern the manner in which the last and highest court of appeal is dispensing justice, under your leadership.
My Lord, the dignity of lawyers is consistently being violated by you. We are treated harshly, rudely, brusquely and nastily. We are not heard. We are not allowed to present our case. There is little scope for advocacy. The words used in the Bar Room for Court No. 1 are “the slaughter house”. We are cowed down by aggression from the Bench, led by you. All we receive from you is arrogance, aggression and belligerence. You also throw away the file, while contemptuously announcing “This is dismissed”.
Yet this aggression is not for everyone. When Mr. Sharifuddin Pirzada appears, your Lordship’s demeanour and appearance is not just sugar and honey. You are obsequious to the point of meekness. So apart from violating our dignity, which the constitution commands to be inviolable, we suffer discrimination in your court.
I am not raising the issue of verbal onslaughts and threats to Police Officers and other Civil Servants, who have the misfortune to be summoned, degraded and reminded that “This is the Supreme Court”.
The way in which My Lord conducts proceedings is not conducive to the process of justice. In fact, it obstructs due process and constitutes contempt of the Supreme Court itself.
I am pained at the wide publicity to cases taken up by My Lord in the Supreme Court under the banner of Fundamental Rights. The proceedings before the Supreme Court can conveniently and easily be referred to the District and Sessions Judges. I am further pained by the media coverage of the Supreme Court on the recovery of a female. In the bar room, this is referred to as a “Media Circus”.
My Lord, this communication may anger you and you are in any case prone to get angry in a flash, but do reflect upon it. Perhaps you are not cognizant of what your brother judges feel and say about you.
My Lord, before a rebellion arises among your brother judges (as in the case of Mr Justice Sajjad Ali Shah), before the Bar stands up collectively and before the entire matter is placed before the Supreme Judicial Council, there may be time to change and make amends.
I hope you have the wisdom and courage to make these amends and restore serenity, calm, compassion, patience and justice tempered with mercy to my Supreme Court.
My Lord, we all live in the womb of time and are judged, both by the present and by history. The judgement about you, being rendered in the present, is adverse in the extreme.
Yours faithfully,
Naeem Bokhari
Advocate
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI’s murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
**What Has Been Seen Cannot Be Unseen **](http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/310/209/69f.jpg)
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Last night imran khan (anchor) did a great show wth arsalan iftikhar n once again arsalan was not able to defrndhimself
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
But he is very charb zabaan.
Looks, talks and acts like a don.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Last night imran khan (anchor) did a great show wth arsalan iftikhar n once again arsalan was not able to defrndhimself
I saw part of that show. It was disaster for Arsalan. I was watching the show and wondering how did Arsalan have the courage to come to a live show when he knew how corrupt he is. He was probably thinking that he would just have to give a few answers, but Imran the anchor was prepared with all the evidences.
Mazhar Abbas also had some interesting questions for him: "You are proud of your father. Is your father proud of you too?"
I think Iftikhar Ch. must actually be proud of him.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Anchor was fully prepared no break full 56 mins straight show.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
last night's program at ARY was another of the episodes.
Arsalan now asking Imran khan to declare his assets and the main asset is his children ????
Shame ful program being aired ??
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Previously I used to think that malik Riaz was blackmailing him, now it's becoming clearer that it could well have been the other way round.
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI's murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
Why is he given so much air time? Who is he? What political, legislative value and importance does he hold?
It's disgusting how TV channels are pitching elected members of Parliament against this crook who's basically given ample screen time because of his surname.
It's also pathetic how the channel told Murad Saeed that he'll be sitting against a Minister or something, not this idiot.
The kind of utterly personal discussions I'm seeing national TV is just embarrassing.
Arsalan just seems too ghatya in how he talks, and ran around in circles in his answers, one point he had on ptcl allegation he jumped up and down. A fruit does not fall far from the tree.
I wonder if Yale, that jumped on the thief justice ifti bandwagon to give him an honorary degree regrets it now.
There may be a campaign to make him 'relevant' by daddy dear here but the nation needs to nip it in the bud. Or are we fascinated with this being our alternative to cheap reality shows. Is he our honey booboo?
Re: Unseen Clip of Fight between PTI’s murad Saeed and Arsalan Iftikhar
As much as he’s a crook himself, there are/were big names supporting him for a long time 
Arsalan Iftikhar case a conspiracy against judiciary: Imran - Pakistan - DAWN.COMBy Dawn.comPublished Jun 09, 2012 07:42pm****Arsalan Iftikhar case a conspiracy against judiciary: Imran
Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf chief Imran Khan. – File Photo by ReutersISLAMABAD: Chairman Tehrik-i-Insaaf Imran Khan has said that the revelations coming out in Arsalan Iftikhar case clearly show a deliberate attempt to undermine the Supreme Court.In a statement, the PTI chief said that the sequence of events clearly shows that the target of the entire conspiracy was the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.“Unnerved by the courageous decisions of the Supreme Court, the ruling mafia decided to damage his image. Since the CJ himself is incorruptible and a man of high integrity,” he said. Khan stated that those wanting to weaken him chose to target his son."While much of the evidence is yet to come out, said the PTI chairman, it has been admitted by Riaz Malik according to newspaper reports that he paid for vacations and shopping sprees of Arsalan Iftikhar.Why did he do this, asked Khan? CJ’s son was not working for Riaz Malik and had no business relations with him. The only reason this was done was to entrap him and then blackmail or undermine the integrity of the Chief Justice, said Imran Khan.“This is further established by the fact that all the receipts of the transactions and reportedly some video clips were carefully retained. If there was no ulterior motive,” said Chairman PTI, "then why was this incriminating evidence against the CJ’s son being collected?"He said that there is little doubt that this was a well thought out conspiracy to defame the Chief Justice and the Supreme Court and Malik Riaz played a central role in it.“Arsalan Iftikhar also has much to explain,” said Imran Khan, and that if evidence establishes that he accepted favours by making promises of influencing his father, then he must bear the consequences.“The Chief Justice has done the right thing by deciding not to hear the case himself. The truth will surely come out. But, facts reported in the media clearly show that Riaz Malik’s intent was not to buy influence but only to compromise the Chief Justice’s son and use this later to defame the judiciary,” said the statement by the PTI chief.“We know who are the real instigators behind Riaz Malik’s conspiracy. He is just a pawn in the hands of the corrupt Zardari/Gilani cabal ruling the country that is threatened by an independent judiciary. It has long been seeking to undermine it in whatever way possible,” he said.“Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaaf will stand with the independent judiciary,” said Imran khan.