Re: Unmarried guys
^I haven't even included eating disorders statistics.
Re: Unmarried guys
in indian state of orissa ppl of rural areas ate grass.........
they r ignorant of where this world is going n u calling them happy......
they have their own problems.....
ppl starving for food r called happy....thats a cruel joke........
how many women die during pregnancy,what is child mortality rate.....
how ppl live in slums u dont think all that and call them happy because they r not complaining
Re: Unmarried guys
^going by your logic richest country's kids should be the most happiest kids on earth, but guess what? They're not.
I don't how to make you understand a simple thing like that?
I think I'm done with you.
Re: Unmarried guys
All human beings r near about same in nature....nothing is enough for us then how can we be happy...
dont u see ppl in africa how they fight wt they fight for....
in rural areas ppl r engage in civilian cases related to agriculture land,r they happy...
i have seen rural life closely......they also have their own problems....
Re: Unmarried guys
^You don't know the context of this thread, you just picked up a point from my post that's not even related to the main discussion, not my fault if you can't see the broader picture.
Re: Unmarried guys
i know wtz this thread is about and i posted my views before #3 .
i mentioned my views regardin happiness coz thats wt i think.....
plz continue with ur discussion and actually u should look out wtz the topic of this thread plz
Re: Unmarried guys
I would be very happy to sign that option if she wanted, but when we got married, we did not know of that option, not that she would've asked for it even if we knew.
Re: Unmarried guys
Q1 shehri aur dehaati zindagi par mazmoon likhe? 10 Marks
Re: Unmarried guys
I have finally got a reasonable answer to this question. And here it is below ... I can't believe I didn't think of this before ... Since people have said rightly that nikkah is a contract then a condition from one side can be met by other conditions.
So here it is:
"The husband agrees to bestow the power of talaq without the need for khula proceedings to the wife which will take effect no earlier than 6 months of marriage time.
If the husband shows any violent or threatening behaviour to the wife that she can demonstrate to independent witnesses then such a scenario shall earn the wife the power of talaq without the need for khula proceedings from 6 months of marriage even if such an incident occurs before 6 months, this does not affect her right to khula.
If the husband becomes unable to fulfill his duties as a husband due to a change of circumstance, such as an accident, new illness or disorder or financial instability then the wife earns the power of talaq without the need for khula proceedings no earlier than 18 months of marriage, even if such a change occurs before 18 months.
The wife shall earn the power of talaq without the need of khula proceedings when and if she bears a child under this nikkah at any time to take effect only after 18 months of marriage, even if the child is born earlier.
The wife gains the power of talaq without the need of khula proceedings without condition if the marriage is childless for 5 years.
At no time during the marriage can this right be taken away from the wife unless she waivers that right before witnesses and the nikkah is revised by mutual consent."
Does that sound more reasonable?