Thats what BB was ‘demanding’ in the negotiations that power be transferred ‘smoothly’ to her (of course we are not talking about abrupt process here).
There there, now you are trying to understand the problem and making yourself comfortable to the ‘solution’. No matter how you try to look at it or try to explain, keeping power in family is nothing more than ‘dictatorship’, its not democratic.
If people in a party ‘betray’ their leader it simply means that the ‘leader’ did something to earn that, it is that simple. The reason PPP accepted Zardari as their chief is multifold, one being themselves non-democratic, secondly they wanted to use the name ‘Bhutto’ to earn victory.
Wait, BB is making her own family as inheritor of leadership, because they will not betray the dead-person (Benazir herself)? ![]()
‘Nominating’ family person who has zero political experience over people who spent their lives for the party (and more deserving) means she didn’t trust anyone else? Nice leadership they had there.
Benazir had problems of her own, it was during her time that ‘fight for Kashmir’ was restarted, hence the different lashkars formed… now its the same lashkars we are dealing with today, the ones who are inviting all the world’s wrath. Middle-class? Yeah, they do need to grow, grow out of PPP, MQM, PML-N, army etc. Its time to grow the fk up for people who think PPP is great or BB was great.
Transition doesn’t mean that one political party sits on the table trying to get all the perks/power, it means all political parties sit together against dictatorship.