Re: TuQ Arrival
^^^ Your observation is quite right ... please read :)
People getting into power through politics and becoming public representative cannot have cake and eat that cake too (be representative looking after public wealth and do haram-khori too … that is eat that public wealth). They have to decide if they would be ‘corrupt dishonest haram-khor Thug when in power’ or ‘honest benevolent public representative when in power’.
If they would be corrupt dishonest haram-khor Thug when in power than they have no moral right to rule as public representative, and in that case it is duty of army to make an example of them by throwing them out of power and hanging them,
On the other hand, if they would be honest public representative then they would have every moral right to rule (obviously without breaking laws and behaving Gullu Shareef) and in that case their chair of power would be so strong that no other power can touch it.
Plus … it is also impossible for haram-khor thugs to change their clothing and start promising the people that now they have become honest … because once haram-khor is always a haram-khor (they are biggest murderer and cause of misery for people). People instead of giving them another chance, people ‘plus powerful forces in the country (like armed forces) should give them easy exist from this world with rope.
To say that for public representative, election or public supports decides who is haram-khor or honest is not only wrong but it is propaganda of haram-khors to save their asses. It is just like to say that public decides who is murderer or who is not. Public can get fooled or disillusioned by charm talks of haram-khors but to decide if a person is haram-khor is duty of those who can monitor a person and his activities, and it is only state machinery (including armed forces) that can monitor a person, especially when person is in power holding office.
In earlier days of his rule, Z A Bhutto for West Pakistan was taken as honest representative of people (there was no way to judge him at that time), so he was able to do whatever he liked without problem. But with time, in mid 1970s, Bhutto, because of his Brutal (Gullu) behaviour, many killing of his opponents (as perceived), mismanagement of economy, increasing corruption, disrespecting other parties mandate (Baluchistan and NWFP), plus massive rigging of election, caused him losing all moral right to rule, resulting in people coming on road against him, and army kicking his ass off the seat of power.
Rehnay dain sir jee, hum khud hi inqalaab burpa kar dain gay!