[QUOTE]
See - We are giving them conditions so that they can feel at home, Poor Stephnie is still complaining. :)
[/QUOTE]
Had i posted this article, i would have highlighted whole article but these two lines :)
I wish India chases in this match and wins! That should give Flemmo something to think about. Odds favor us anyway so it should be OK to lose the toss and bat second.
I thought u menat it should be OK TO LOSE THE MATCH 
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Decent 6Chora: *
Had i posted this article, i would have highlighted whole article but these two lines :)
[/QUOTE]
Bullseye!
Took the words out of mouth.
This is what you call selective reading. :)
it’s crunch-time ay
New Zealand without Chris Cains and India without Anil Kumble - Virendar Sehwag is dropped - Rahul Dravid will keep the wickets - i did see that coming…
India decided to bat first.
Waisay i just wonder, India must have some good wicketkeeper who can bat, rather than raoming between Rahul Dravid and Parhtiv Patel. I remember Vijay Dahiya was a good hard hitting late order batsman, This Parthiv guy is mediocre at best and Dravid is a below average keeper.
*6th Match: India v New Zealand at Cuttack, 6 Nov 2003
India won the toss and elected to bat first
India 59/1 (11.3 ov) India RR: 5.13
star* batsmen and master blaster 10+dulkar the only casualty of the day, trapped lbw (although replays show otherwise) by mills.
10+dulkar’s dismissal>>>
**
5.2 Mills to Tendulkar, OUT: bowled from wide of the crease, angled
into the pads, strikes Tendulkar on the pads, huge appeal, given
out, seems to be going down the leg side * **
Don’t you just wish! lol
Now that’s a good move - Shewag out and Kaif opening! Trying out all the combinations and permutations before the Aus tour…
what I didn’t see coming was 5 bowlers and 6 batsmen! Another good move!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by karina: *
Don't you just wish! lol
Now that's a good move - Shewag out and Kaif opening! Trying out all the combinations and permutations before the Aus tour...
[/QUOTE]
It was Laxman who was opening, not Kaif, he came one down.
what a finish by zaheer khan.. 20 off the last over
zaheer khan 33 of just 13 bowls..
NewZealand will be chasing 247 under lights...
And Zaheer gives away the 33 runs he scored in his first 2 overs! Then comes back to take the big fish - Harris! It's all over, the fat lady has sung....
latest score
India 246/9 (50 ov) India RR: 4.92 (mo' kaif 64, h. badani 41)
New Zealand 41/2 (7.2 ov) New Zealand RR: 5.59
New Zealand require another 205 runs with 8 wickets
and 42.4 overs remaining
Required RR: 4.80
The game is over, India has won the game:
India 246/9 (50 ov)
New Zealand 72/4 (16.2 ov)
^ and they deserved to lose after such blatant cheating! Yuvraj was not out and Mills claimed a catch after touching the ball to the ground - shameless Kiwis!
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by karina: *
Mills claimed a catch after touching the ball to the ground - shameless Kiwis!
[/QUOTE]
Let's see if he gets banned for 5 matches.
he won’t becoz his name isn’t rashid latif, he doesn’t represent pak cric team and he hasn’t got a dark brown complexion 
This match is getting exciting unless India gets a few quick wickets.
NZ 150/4
Require 97 runs with 6 wickets intact off 108 balls.
Wake up call for the Indian team.
Looks grim for India.
NZ181/4.
Requires 66 runs with 6 wickets standing off 78 balls.
The actual problem is that Harbhajan has only got 1 over and Zaheer 2 overs left.
Then it is Tendi, Agarkar, Bahutule (where did you get him from) and Kartik.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Changez_like: *
The game is over, India has won the game:
India 246/9 (50 ov)
New Zealand 72/4 (16.2 ov)
[/QUOTE]
This is cricket bacha. Game is never (or rarely) over until its over :)
NZ = 187/4 in 37.4 overs
Partnership is now 119 runs. Goob batting by Styres(62) and McMillan(54).
NZ require 60 more runs at the rate of 4.86/over with 6 wickets in hand.
I guess now only NZ can beat NZ. NZ batsmen really have to work hard and play horrible cricket to lose it from here