I have to say doing a "Trash the Dress" session is a fantasy of mine - though of course not to "trash" the dress.
It is just unfortunate this is the name that's stuck. In Malaysia they call it "outdoor portraiture", while others call it "day-after", "drown the gown", etc.
Really "Trash the Dress" is too broad a category, because it includes both photos that are beautiful, tasteful, celebratory, and those that are, well, trashy - extreme, ugly, pointless.
I've seen brides ruining their dresses with paint, cutting them up with scissors, setting them alight and generally just destroying them. Complete madness. I don't know what goes through the heads of these people. There's no artistic value to it, it is just stupid and extreme.
However, on the other hand, I've seen many very beautiful photos, where the natural environment complements the bride - forests, ripe fields, waterfalls, rivers, beaches. These are romantic photos. I like the idea of bringing water into the equation.
If I had the chance, I would love to do a photo session like this. These, for example, are in my opinion really quite lovely:
- flickr.com/photos/brianroberts/2886880826
- flickr.com/photos/emilycmccall/530967066
- flickr.com/photos/azharuddin/2501947892
- flickr.com/photos/azharuddin/2119499602
- flickr.com/photos/kimrobbins/2439004384
- flickr.com/photos/azharuddin/2878218816
- flickr.com/photos/oceantsunami/2188252005
- flickr.com/photos/richjohnsonphoto/2722580647
...well I could go on all day. The point is, there is a side to this that really appeals to me. Not the extremes of the concept that are just "trash".
But would I sit on wet sand, paddle in the sea, dance in the rain, splash about in water, kneel amidst leaves, lie back in a field of barley, embrace beneath the trees, dash through a waterfall?
Yes I would, if I could. But perhaps all this is just a pleasure to strive for in the hereafter, where those who have faith and do good deeds are promised gardens beneath which rivers flow!