** Study says trade across LoC only CBM between Pakistan, India that directly benefits Kashmiri people
Feb 2011
Staff Report*
ISLAMABAD: Speaking at the opening session of ‘Discussion Papers on Jammu and Kashmir: Trade Across the Line of Control (LoC)’, panelists said that trade and commerce across the Line of Control (LoC) can **minimise tensions between India and Pakistan and enhance inter-dependence, which could lead towards conflict resolution. **
**The panelists were of the view that trade across LoC was the only confidence-building measure (CBM) between Pakistan and India which directly benefited the Kashmiri people. Experts were of the view that people-to-people contact and trade had contributed positively on both sides of Kashmir. **
National Assembly Standing Committee on Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan Chairman Shahzada Mohiuddin said that people on both sides of the LoC were “quite happy after the start of the intra-Kashmir trade and it has provided an opportunity to the people across LoC to meet each other”. He said that plebiscite was the need of the hour, which could enable both sides to prosper. He asked the authors of the papers to send them to the Federal Ministry of Kashmir Affairs.
One of the panelists Dr Hassan Askari Rizvi said that a practical effort was being made to determine how to engage in conflict management and conflict resolution. He was of the view that if trade and commerce increased, tension and conflict could be minimised. This creates stakeholders on both sides and allows greater human interaction on the both sides of the LoC, Rizvi said.
He said that the papers had tried to review the movement of goods and people across the LoC and have gathered useful information, especially on trade and its impact. Ayesha Saeed and Arif Kamal, the authors of the papers, were of the opinion that intra-Kashmir trade was not just another CBM, it was in fact the first-ever CBM which directly benefited the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Inter-dependence rather inter-connection could benefit people across the LoC, they said.
They said that both the sides should benefit equally from the trade. Logistical and other hindrances could harm the intra-Kashmir trade. They were of the opinion that it was a long overdue step in the right direction to ease suffering of the people on both sides of the LoC. Zulfiqar Abbasi, while presenting his perspective, said that the conflict of Kashmir had turned the place termed “paradise on earth” to hell with extreme poverty, untapped economical potential and dependence on others”.
He pointed out hindrances and problems faced by the traders, elaborating that trade was restricted only to 21 items and two days a week. He said that hopes were high but on ground it was “too little “ for an economic revival of the people of the area. He demand that a multi-entry trade pass of at least two years should be issued to traders on both sides of the LoC.
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\02\09\story_9-2-2011_pg7_17
i always wondered why the two countries never traded more with each other, importing/exporting items to each other more rather than trying to import the same things from countries half way across the world would benefit both