TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Hangout GupShup Cafe

Saad_UAE March 13, 2007, 4:26pm 1

**WASHINGTON — The chairman of the US Joint chiefs of staff **said Monday he considers homosexuality to be immoral and the military should not condone it by allowing gay personnel to serve openly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
I guess the above statement summarizes it all…It is basically the time to criticize this act of immorality in its fullest..US & West are at that point in time of their history where they have to choose between allowing Gay Sex to go ahead or to label it as pathetic …

If someone says that he is born gay with Homosexual tendencies and that he cannot control it…Then he can be gay in his own pants but he/she should not be allowed to commit the acts of sexual pleasures with Sodomy & so on…

Once you allow these sorts of immoralities to go ahead in the society ,then you have to deal with the issues like gay marriages/civil unionships etc.

Son_of_the_Indus March 13, 2007, 4:33pm 2

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

I’m glad American terrorists and Muslim terrorists have found common ground and something to agree on…

Yeah two men loving each other is immoral but US of America bombing (or helping bomb) Iraqis, Afghans, Palestinians, Iranians etc. and raping them sado-machist style is not… Neither is Muslim terrorists ramming planes into buildings, bombing public transport and clubs thereby murdering old grannies and little babies immoral…

Fookin’ breeders (yes I’m hetrophobic), I’m beginning to see that right-wing morons are the same narrow-minded sh!ts whichever society they come from, be they Paki Muslim or American Christian.

Saad_UAE March 13, 2007, 4:45pm 3

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

This is not about 2 Men loving each other....You can like as many as men as you prefer in your life as your Father , Brothers, Uncles, Friends etc,but you don't do sex with them....First they are allowing them to sodomize each other and then they ask them not to marry each other....The basic answer to control this epidemic is to create a sense of wrong doing in commiting to gay sex...One can act as effeminate as one like to ,may be he is born to act this way...but it should be in his/her control to not to indulge in the homosexual sex....

Nomad.71 March 13, 2007, 7:24pm 4

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Sex is personal choice, wether somebody indulges in SM or boundage, hetrosexual, self indulgence or gay/lesbian relationships. It has nothing to do with their productivity as an individual in the society.

Submission_To_Peace March 13, 2007, 7:36pm 5

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Too late for a General to express his feelings about an army which has been suffering from it long ago and practicing it some what openly. Anways, better to say it late than not saying it.

Kit

Mabrook March 13, 2007, 8:52pm 6

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

yea ab kia ho sakta hai?this group is already quite powerful now.

Ur GS nicks

Seminole March 13, 2007, 9:09pm 7

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

I somehow don't find the lectures on morality from a military commander that has backed the invasion and subsequent occupation of Iraq very credible.

picoico March 14, 2007, 2:16am 8

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Then why the need for recognition or "rights"?

PyariCgudia March 14, 2007, 2:18am 9

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Why don't you worry more about what's going on in the UAE, rather than what is happening in other countries? You guys don't like the Americans sticking their nose in other nations' affairs, and so what makes you think your opinions really matter to us Americans?

Saad_UAE March 14, 2007, 2:41am 10

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

^ Calm down... i am US Citizen by birth living in UAE...So don't try to act more American then me...

Seminole March 14, 2007, 4:56pm 11

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

Sorry, but even conservative Americans who consider homosexuality immoral and perverted aren't trying to legislate it as illegal. Your initial post implies the government has the power to ban homosexuality - it doesn't.

Mr_Fraudia March 14, 2007, 5:06pm 12

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

ouch ...

shweetdreamz March 14, 2007, 5:22pm 13

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

i guess its human nature to worry about what other humans are wearing, eating and who they are choosing to have sex with.

Amorphous March 14, 2007, 5:31pm 14

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

you mean voyeurism is in our genes?

shweetdreamz March 14, 2007, 5:58pm 15

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

lol that puts a perverse spin on things doesnt it?

one would think there are more important things to do than make others' sexuality our business. i mean has the top US general ever questioned a war against innocents? i mean....since we're talking about "immorality" here and all...........

Saad_UAE March 14, 2007, 6:04pm 16

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

It is not an issue of being conservative or not....Pace is right in calling these acts immoral & asking to contiue to ban them in Military.

Submission_To_Peace March 14, 2007, 7:00pm 17

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

[quote=]
i guess its human nature to worry about what other humans are wearing, eating and who they are choosing to have sex with.
[/quote]

True, in other words "encouraging good" and "discouraging bad" is part of human nature and also taught by all major religons, specially Islam, because personal bad deeds of many individuals ultimately has a negative impact on the whole society.

For example. Drinking might be considered as a personal act by many people, but if we study the crime report, we come to know that most rapes, sexual abuses, incest, killing and traffic accidents are casued by people having some percentage of alcohol in their body.

shweetdreamz March 14, 2007, 7:21pm 18

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

see the only problem is that notions of "good" and "bad" are relative.
i agree some acts may have a negative impact on the whole society such as the drunk driving example you gave..but i fail to see how someone else's sexuality, what they wear and what they eat affects me. e.g. i know there exist women out there that rather sleep with women only but it certainly doesnt make me want to go out and do the same.

and if you come up and say that you oppose homosexuality because your religious books tell you to do so, then i guess in order to survive in todays world you need to respect other points of view too. just for the sake of surviving. since there really is no rock solid proof out there laying out the truth about the presence (or lack) of a gay gene.

Nomad.71 March 14, 2007, 7:30pm 19

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

I call it pocking nose in the other people's matters.

What crime report are you reffering to?

I don't think it is the right example because people are hurt and killed by non drinkers as well.

Submission_To_Peace March 14, 2007, 8:24pm 20

Re: TOP US GENERAL RIGHTLY CALLS GAY ACTS IMMORAL.

@shweetdreamz
There are certain universal definitions of good and bad.
All living things follow their true nature as their minds are pre-designed to follow their natural instincts. Only humans have been given the ability to go against their nature.There are certain rules of nature, which when violated disturb the whole system. The reason for gays being not natural is that you won't find gays among any single type of animal, bird, fish or any other living things.

About their effect on society.

I came across a nice person who was a gay. I asked him the reason and he told me that he grew up watching his two moms having "relationships" in one house, which raised curiosity in his immature mind regarding relationships b/w people of same gender. So, lesbians did ruin the life of this child by practicing this act. If such people keep practicing it in open, a time will come when the whole system of reproduction would be disturbed. Such unnatural activities give rise to diseases which were not even known in the history. Also such people have played the main role in child abuse in the society.Why I personally don't respect such people is because in my childhood few people belonging to the same catagory tried to abuse me and Allah saved me. Few of my other colleagues who became the victom in childhood grew up to become gays and child abusers themselves. So the process continues...

@ Nomad.71. The definition of a muslim in Surah-e-Asr does not call it poking nose.

THE DECLINING DAY, EVENTIDE, THE EPOCH **
**CHAPTER NO. 103 (Quran)

By (the Token of) Time (through the ages),

Verily Man is in loss,

Except such as have Faith, and do righteous deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of Truth, and of Patience and Constancy

Had this encouraging good and discouraging bad not existed, people would have long ago become worse than animals.

@ crime. I came to know from an authentic source that the USA department of crimes gave this report that in more than 95 % of cases of rape either the victom or the culprit is drunk. In 99 % of cases of incest sex, both the members of the family are drunk ( common sense, no person in his senses would commit sex in the same family). A drunk driver causes more accidents because he himself is not aware of what he is doing and has lost his focus.