Reza, I don't know if they (SAAG) reported that about Iran, but tell me which part of this excerpt from the article isn't true:
In May,1988, the Shias, who are in a majority in Gilgit, rose in revolt against the Sunni-dominated administration. Zia put an SSG group commanded by Gen. Musharraf in charge of suppressing the revolt. Gen. Musharraf transported a large number of Wahabi Pakhtoon tribesmen from the NWFP and Afghanistan, commanded by bin Laden, to Gilgit to teach the Shias a lesson. These tribesmen under bin Laden massacred hundreds of Shias.
In its issue of May,1990, "Herald", the monthly journal of the "Dawn" group of publications of Karachi, wrote as follows: " In May,1988, low-intensity political rivalry and sectarian tension ignited into full-scale carnage as thousands of armed tribesmen from outside Gilgit district invaded Gilgit along the Karakoram Highway. Nobody stopped them. They destroyed crops and houses, lynched and burnt people to death in the villages around Gilgit town. The number of dead and injured was put in the hundreds. But numbers alone tell nothing of the savagery of the invading hordes and the chilling impact it has left on these peaceful valleys."
Gen. Musharraf started a policy of bringing in Punjabis and Pakhtoons from outside and settling them down in Gilgit and Baltistan in order to reduce the Kashmiri Shias to a minority in their traditional land and this is continuing till today. The "Friday Times" of October 15-21, 1992, quoted Mr. Muhammad Yahya Shah, a local Shia leader, as saying: " We were ruled by the Whites during the British days. We are now being ruled by the Browns from the plains. The rapid settling-in of Punjabis and Pakhtoons from outside, particularly the trading classes, has created a sense of acute insecurity among the local Shias."
Master, I don’t believe much from biased Hindu sources, and I am surprised you do. These people still blame “external forces” meaning Pak for the Gujrat genocide of Muslims, so they can tell many other lies as well.
Sheikh Mujib Ur Rehman -- The only leader who can deservedly claim the title of "Quaid-
e-Awam"...Bhattu's sorry despotic ass had nothing on the title and not to forget Mujib
defeated him in the '71 election hands down
Altaf Husein -- Being that ugly and still appeal to the jahil masses takes some skills.
Bhutto and Mujiber are on different levels. the founder of a country isn't supposed to get shot. unless you have some conspiracy theory that you could entertain me with.
Yeah and did you get a chance to crawl out of Bhattu’s a$$ to see Zia’s funeral…how the masses were overcome by profound sadness and poured over in the streets in the Capital…Unlike the scum Bhattu, who was probably kicked around a few times by the bhangis to see if he was still alive after being hanged…