**Three detainees at the US base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, have died in what appears to have been a joint suicide pact, officials said. **
It was not immediately clear when the inmates - two Saudis and a Yemeni - died, the US military said.
They “were found unresponsive and not breathing in their cells by guards”.
The US holds about 460 men at the facility on suspicion of links to Osama Bin Laden’s al-Qaeda organisation and the Taleban ex-leaders of Afghanistan.
They are the first deaths reported at the detention centre.
“Medical teams responded quickly and all three detainees were provided immediate emergency medical treatment in attempts to revive them,” the Joint Task Force which runs the camp said in a statement.
“The three detainees were pronounced dead by a physician after all lifesaving measures had been exhausted.”
Unrest
It is not first time detainees have attempted to commit suicide since the camp was set up four years ago.
Forty-one attempts have been made by 25 prisoners since then.
President George W Bush has been notified of the incident and the Pentagon is expected to issue a statement about the deaths.
Some detainees have been involved in on and off hunger strikes since last August to protest at their continued detention and conditions, although according to authorities the number dropped to 18 last weekend from a high of 131.
On Friday, Mr Bush responded to growing calls for the prison to be shut down, by saying: “We would like to end the Guantanamo - we’d like it to be empty.”
“There are some that, if put out on the streets, would create grave harm to American citizens and other citizens of the world. And, therefore, I believe they ought to be tried in courts here in the United States,” he added.
People caught in Afghani conflict and war zone may be innocent until proven guilty. That's what the defense lawyer would say. However innocents don't show up for a picnic (or in case of the two UK NRP $tupids, for marriage) in the war zones.
Muslims who leave their homes, families and countries, do not just one day decide to pack and do Jihad against the oppressor and tyrant…They spend months learning about Islam and every little bit of info they can…
These people spend their waking minutes in the company of scholars and Islamic academics who teach them every aspect of Islam…And one of the most unbreakable, unshakable, undeniable, uncompromising tenet of Islam which even the most fringe Muslim would know is the fact that taking your own life to avoid pain or torture is absolutely forbidden…
Coupled with that fact, is that these were people who had left their houses to die in battlefields wouldn’t ever cop out of life so easily…
These men were tortured to death…
The many stories coming out of Gitmo in the past about suicide attempts were nothing more than propaganda spread after having almost having tortured them almost to the brink of death…So, as a foresight they spread these lies about these unfotunate victims of democracy that they attempt suicide, in the case someone might die of torture…
Inna-Lillah-e-Wa-Inna-Ilaih-e-Rajioon…
May Allah :swt: grant them Shahadat for the pains they bore…May Allah :swt: elevate their status closer to the martyrs of Karbala and Prophets (pbut) for every pain and torture they endured at the hands of the tyrants and may their blood be soon avenged…Ameen, Summa Ameen…
I agree with you that most if not all the deaths are probably torture...
But doesnt it work against the Americans both ways...suicide shows they have treated these inmates so bad they have been brought to a situation where they want to take their lives...its really bad PR for Guantanamo...So by switching the information doesnt make it look better...they still looks like brutal treatment whether look at it as torture or suicide...
Torture to murder...and torture to suicide...Both are terrible for the US...
It was aided suicide. Their compatriots in adjoining cells strangled them through the mesh walls/fencing. It was coordinated and calculated meant to demoralize. They probably heard that their man in Iraq got whacked.
Anyway, the people that are in gitmo now are hardcore terrorists. All the rest have been released, and many have gone back to their jihadi ways. These guys decided to off themselves instead of getting a needle. I'm not really fretting it, I do think there was a lapse or breakdown in the security and that needs to be addressed. These guys need to stand trial, not off themselves.
The US government originally said that all at Gitmo were hardcore terrorists… and them embarassingly, ended up releasing so many fo them and then tried to claim once more that they now had only the hardcore ones left. After which more were released…
Good punch line. Of course the thesis of your retort is that these people are innocent. To the contrary, they were picked up in battle fields. One was going to be released into another country, but instead he committed suicide. I'm not going to loose any sleep. Instead of a .221 round he decided he is going to kill himself, but he had made that decision already when he decided to go off to jihad and fight the infedels.
I'm trying to see exactly why it is my post was censored/removed by the mod or director?
It's apparently unacceptable to use the words idiot or retard (the two strongest in my censored post) even though they weren't directed to any individual. However it is apparently acceptable to:
1) Describe the foreign fighters in Afghanistan as those who are "doing jihad"
2) Call the members of the US military in Cuba murderers (w/out any of what most of you Einsteins call "proofs")
3) Accuse another guppy of being either ignorant or a liar
It's apparently unacceptable to use the words idiot or retard (the two strongest in my censored post) even though they weren't directed to any individual. However it is apparently acceptable to:
1) Describe the foreign fighters in Afghanistan as those who are "doing jihad"
2) Call the members of the US military in Cuba murderers (w/out any of what most of you Einsteins call "proofs")
3) Accuse another guppy of being either ignorant or a liar
Another great example of balanced moderating.
So the best conspiracy theory you retards can offer is that these three were murdered by torture?
The above was part of your post. Can you explain what do you mean by "you retards" and to whom were you referring.
Liar, ignorant, retard, what's the difference? There are ways to express differing opinions without name calling or selective censorship.
The fact is that no one on this board knows the facts. The US' reputation of late does not warrant credibility and the criminality of some of these detainees does not warrant declarations of piety or innocence.
I think it’s pretty clear that I’m referring to any retard who would manufacture, or believe, this ridiculous theory. In your world guess it’s more acceptable to say that Lajawab is either:
A) Ignorant
B) A liar
Or is it that someone can only name call when they agree with you?