a well written article, funny but true.
**The Top 10 Pro-regressive Mozlem Idiots of 2005
**Dropping IN: Guest Writer
Tuesday, January 17, 2006
2005 is over, the Islamic new year is almost upon us, and in the spirit of cooperation and spreading good communitst vibes I’ve put together a list of the most obnoxious, fake, and divisive individuals from the proggie movement.
-
Jawad Ali of the MWU poofter division slandered Muslim Fest amongst other Muslim themed events which didn’t cater to his pro-regressive nonsense. Ali claimed that there was a lack of female participation when in fact half of the organizers were women. This act of decepetion lands mwu’s resident fruit at number ten.
-
Naseeb.com, the online desi meat market (aka a website for outcasts by outcasts), tried to steal some of ISNA’s thunder this year by hosting its own “meetup” at the same time. It didn’t go as planned with the “meetup” failing miserably. In true pro-regressive fashion Naseeb ran a vicious and factually incorrect article in its “Vibes” section titled “ISNA Thugs” written by some tool named “Umbreen Shah.” It also appeared on mwu. All this, while neocon ratfinks were slamming ISNA as well. Don’t even get me started on Irshad Manji and Stephen Schwartz’s articles. This act of petty partisanship and nepotism lands Naseeb.com and its bigwigs at number nine.
-
Exiled and deported Iranians, in an act of political transvestism, have now become “human rights advocates.” We all know that communists with blood-stained hands make great human rights activists, but many of these heavily accented, green card/fame seeking Ahmed Chalabi wannabees are not content merely with peddling misinformation on women’s rights in Islam but are also building a bipartisan consensus to launch a war against Iran (with neocon blessings of course). They worked hand in hand with pro-regressive slimeballs against allowing Muslims access to religious arbitration to settle disputes, which was already available to Jews and Christians. Comrade Stalin and Chairman Mao would no doubt be proud with having the Arjomands, Darabis, and hordes of other exiled criminals holed up in the west at number eight.
-
Mohja Kahf, mwu’s resident pornographer is quiet these days. I guess the shock value of writing crappy articles which would normally make the grade at Hustler (if they were lax about quality) wore off. Or perhaps it was the cancellation of HBO’s “Sex and the City” which Kahf admits inspired her in the first place. I suppose she’ll have to steal what she can from “Desperate Housewives” till something better comes along and “inspires” her to leave her spot at number seven.
-
Muhammed Ali Hasan, the calamity of birth known as the manchild behind “Mozlems for Bush,” aka “Corrupt Pakistani Charlatans for Bush” normally would not make this list. I would not have given him the attention he so desperately craves. But what makes him number six is not that he has zero credibility, or that he set up a pro-Bush booth at ISNA 2004 (which was rightfully vandalized), but the fact that he authored the stupidest article on Naseeb.com titled “Stop Blaming Bush” for the unacceptably slow response towards the Hurricane Katrina victims (which IN did a slam on as well)](http://www.islamicnetwork.com/index.php/weblog/comments/exclusive_interview_america/). Even Naseeb’s sheep found the article insensitive, insulting, and devoid of facts. But that’s not all. Hasan could not even muster up the courage to criticize his hometown congressman ( Tom “Anti-Immigration” Tancredo) for Islamophobic remarks. How great would it be if Hasan was sent to Iraq - I can only imagine the words he would have for Dubya then.
-
Michael Muhammed Knight, who unlike many of his peers can actually write (yet lacks the brainpower to put it to good use), comes off as a deeply conflicted soul not knowing what he wants or what to do, spending time with pseudo-Islamic cults like the “Nation of Gods and Earths.” He insists that he isn’t a pro-regressive despite what the url to his blog states or the people he hangs out with. He makes the list for his filthy words against the Prophet (pbuh). Normally this would secure him the number one spot, but we have to remember that the jerk isn’t a Muslim to begin with. Did I mention that Knight has collaborated with the likes of Islamophobes Ibn Warraq and Ali Sina? He claims this was done inadvertently. In light of his numerous shenanigans at ISNA as well as his attempt at impersonating Ibrahim Hooper from CAIR, I just don’t believe Mr.Knight and sincerely hope someone tosses him back into the dumpster he crawled out of.
-
A lot of words come to my mind when I hear the name Asra Nomani: clueless, patronizing, bitter, but above all a LIAR. Already known for her friendship to slain reporter Daniel Pearl, Nomani decided that she wanted to boost her profile even more by making demonstrably false and misleading statements about the Morgantown masjid. The unrepentant adulteress ran for a position on the masjid board and pulled a Nixon when she realized she couldn’t win. Spittingly angry, she started making claims of inequality at the masjid in addition to pointing out that her daddy contributed financially to the masjid. Oh I see, so that means that whenever I can’t have my way at my local masjid, I can make ridiculous demands, phony claims, and even drag a camera crew there because I stuffed a few dollars in the donation box. It’s this sort of convoluted logic which places the disgusting Nomani at number four. If only RU-486 was available in Pakistan…
-
Amina “the Quran gives me the ability to say no to it” Wadud is many things- obscure academic, race baiter, and munafiq extraordinaire, but what put her on this list is leading phony Friday prayers in a desperate attempt to put pro-regressive Mozlems on the map. For a group known for its cavalier rejection of the Sunnah of the Prophet (pbuh), it was ironic that they would use a hadith, and a weak one at that, to justify their innovation in religion. If that wasn’t enough, they went on to claim that a scholar from Al-Azhar supported this act which turned out to be false. Praying for show did get all of 30 seconds media attention, gleeful endorsement from ignorant yet well-meaning non-Muslims, and a foot in the door for those minority leeches who don’t mean the Muslim community any good. It may have boosted their profile for a brief period, but to Muslims around the world, this little publicity stunt merely confirmed that these people were munafiqs. It’s not really that the female led prayer is rejected by almost every sect, school, scholar, and pretty much anyone with a brain cell or two who see it for the aberration that it is- it’s more that it’s disgusting that these people try to claim some legitimacy in their press releases for the “academic” reasons that they hold their opinion while in the back they are flushing Islam down the toilet with both hands. If people who claim to care about Islam and scholarship while engaging in all manner of clearly evil deeds in their attempt to “modernize” the religion can’t be called hypocrites, I don’t know who can. With a swift kick in the kaboose (while in ruku) we lauch Ms. Wadud into the stratosphere of number three.
-
The snake oil salesman of the pro-regressive bowel movement and mwu supremo Ahmed Nassef is a busy man. The mendacious masri has spent the last few years desperately trying to sideline established Muslim civil rights groups with outrageous claims and misinformation. With his multiple appearances on FOX, CNN, MSNBC, and other highly impartial news outlets, Nassef has claimed that CAIR is conservative (defending civil rights and telling people to build America with their involvement is conservative?!), that masjids harbor extremists, and pretty much any load of horse manure which is music to the ears of Islamophobes. Universally disliked to the point that some have referred to him as Dajjal, Nassef continues to publish shallow, crappy articles on mwu (are there any other kind?), even asking pointers from Cheryl Bernard, the author of the infamous RAND Corporation Report calling for the fragmentation of Islam. Who could possibly top this candidate for an involuntary lobotomy? Who else but…
1)…the Brad Pitt of the pro-regressive movement- none other than Tarek “I’m Tarek Fatah” Fatah. Why is he our numero uno idiota? Simply because Fatah represents what the pro-regressive Mozlem movement is truly about: aging and unaccomplished sub-marxists and virtual atheists from third world countries with a lifelong inferiority complex and a desire to be accepted, even at the cost of the religion which they don’t believe in. Fatah is infamous even among his own for being a notorious egomaniac and control freak. Thanks to him the PMNUA was shattered in less then a year with resignations all around ( that’s a good thing mind you). Maybe he wouldn’t be such a Jerk-In-The-Box if he didn’t eat all those paint chips and lead pencils when he was a kid or if he weren’t so fat that buildings bounce when he hauls his sumo wrestler mass down the street. Yeah I know, that’s real mean and all…but I really can’t say anything nice about a charlatan who is working hard to make Canadian Muslims second class citizens, denying them equality under the law afforded to other religious groups. Mr. Fatah, in the spirit of Valentine’s Day (coming up) I’d like to express this from the bottom of my heart: you are a piteously lecherous sycophant and a frightful, enema-addicted, festering boil on the butt of humanity. You are an egregiously insufferable plebian and a gluttonous, nostril-offending mutilation of decency. You are a precociously witless mouth breather and a belligerent, all-defiling, deplorable waste of birth. Other than that he’s a swell guy. Try not to make the list next year Curly.
