Re: The punishment of apostate
Over centuries, many things got added to Islam by people who are insecure about their own religious beliefs, were incapable or ignorant to answer question logically, or had doubt that religion Islam could stand upright in front of logical questioning … so instead of increasing their own knowledge, intelligence and ability to think logical, they fabricated hadith to keep many questions at bay … hiding behind their own created draconian laws.
Occasionally, Rulers played a big role in fabrication of hadith too, as they feared that opposition seeing their corrupt rule, could destabilize their government using Quranic ayahs or/and hadiths.
So … my advice is that when seeing anything illogical getting associated with Islam, look into Quran and indisputable hadiths … then only come to conclusion instead of blaming Islam for brutalities, illogical beliefs and ridiculous discrepancies (as Islam is really free from all these … but needs proper thinking, understanding and interpretations of what is already present in Quran).
I wrote on the issue few years ago … and without going into argument or rewriting again … I am posting again what I wrote earlier (in 2010). If you read it and think, I am sure (at least I hope) you will get your answer.
**I have to add here that even tough thre are numerous ayahs about people who accept faith (become Muslim) and then reject faith (become apostate) … and then repeat that process without getting punished for that in this world … that goes well with Islamic principle of freedom in faith … as this world is a testing ground and in testing ground such restriction itself invalidates the test … there is not a single ayah in Quran that tells Muslims to kill those who accepted Islam and then rejected Islam (became apostate), just for rejecting Islam.
Killing apostate is allowed and mentioned (but there is condition for it) … as execution of apostate is not for rejecting faith (becoming apostate) but for creating fitna after rejecting faith … that is … becoming apostate and using that rejection of Islam to do propaganda and misguide people … and that happened during earlier days of Islam (especially by Jews). Such people never accepted Islam in first place but their purpose of accepting Islam was to reject it later (a ploy) so that they use that rejection to misguide others from accepting Islam … and such ploy cannot be tolerated … so, to discourage that, execution of apostate was recommended (I do not think ever implemented) especially when apostate once leaving Islam starts propaganda against Islam to misguide others about Islam (using their once Islamic experience).
That is understandable as Islam do not invite people to accept Islam without complete knowledge and understanding of Islam … and there is nothing that Islam hides that one can make excuse about knowing Islam or Islamic beliefs once that person became Muslim … that means … if one wants to leave Islam (become apostate), they can without problem (or fear of execution or retaliation), but they should not become a tool of propaganda full of lies so to misguide others.
**[Killing of apostate is so ridiculous propaganda against Islam that even a person knowing basic fiqh would find reasons to reject that … as in all Islamic Fiqhs, an apostate lose inheritance and marriage also gets dissolved … but if apostate should get executed than one could not even talk about inheritance or dissolution of marriage.
Some pretending to be ‘Aalim’ are so ‘Jahil’ about Islam that they would not hesitate to claim that apostate should get executed and at the same time would say that … if a person said something kufrana they become Kafir and their marriage is also dissolved … so such person should read Kalma again (to become Muslim) and also get their nikah again to keep their marriage … but if a person became Kafir, what the use of reading Kalma again and getting nikah again … as once apostate he should be killed. :)] **
**