Re: The name Umer according to Shia’s???
Its not today, that has always ben the case since it is wajib to love Ahulbayt [as] and love is not from tongue but from actions as well.
Yes, but again not for the majortiy since they did not adhere to Ahulbaut [as].
There were people who stood with Ahlulbayt [as] including people like Zubayr and Talha who later on sided with others and kept changing their sides time to time keeping their own apporunities in mind.
124000 ashaabs were not present in a single place rather they were scattered. And most importantly, as i said majority were not with Ahlulbayt [as] rather with those “who had achieved the command/reign” may be because they did not want to oppose those in power or they had same pathetic belief “that once a bayah is given, no one can oppose the imam/caliph no matter what are the circumstances” ; the belief which has always been like clothes of the people (opposed to the Shia) till today.
I have notcied this again and again so i want to point out that its not Shias who claim rather Sunnies also adhere to the same belief (if they do not pay heed to this or include someother things to it then thats a sifferent matter).
“I am leaving you two weighty things, if you follow them you will never go astray, they are the Qur’an and my Ahlul’bayt”.
- *Sunan al-Tirmidhi, v5, page 662-663 *
- *Jalaluddin Suyuti declares it Sahih in Al-Jami al-Saghir Volume 3 page 14. *
- l-Hafidh Haythami, declares all subnarrators thuqat in Majma’uz-Zawaid Vol 9 p 165.
- Imam Ibn Hajar Asqalani authenticated the hadith in his book Matalib Aliya.
- *etc *
So i just wanted to remove ignorance that its a claim by Shias only. And your ‘claim’ that Ahulbayt [as] were left stranded alone, then first of all those who did not ahdere to Ahulbayt [as] did wrong to themsleves and opne cannot hold Allah [swt], Prophet [s] and his Ahulbayt [as] responsible for the same. If the querstion is to be asked and finger to be rasied than its the people who did not pay heed to the command of the Prophet [s].Secondly there has always been people (though not many in number) wityh Ahlulbayt [as], we do not find theuir names in the history for their stance due to the fact that they were not prominent ones, but those who were prominent and popular, their support for Ahlulbayt [as] can be seen in history like Salman Farsi [ra], Abu Zar Ghaffari [ra], Ammar Yasir [ra], Abu Ayub Ansari [ra] etc
Of course there was a big element of conspiracy, had those who “claimed to be the best firends of Prophet” waited for his funeral and had not ran away to grab the apportunity and sit on His seat, people would have never divided. Even if they had stepped down later on accpeting their sin/crime, even then things could have been setteled.
Since you are the only one who have heard this kinda of “story”, therefore i dont think its worthy enough for me to comment.
Yes, as i repied above.