Re: The name Umer according to Shia's??????
And how did you reach to the follwing conclusion or may i say conjecture? Mere conjectures are not suffice to reject the accurence of an historical incident which is considered authentic and its not present at once that can be ignored on the basis of strange assumptions rather at four different places in Sahih al Bukhari and twice in Sahih Muslim and ulema have advanced their views on the tradition deeming the incident to be authentic . So please dont come with this new excuse that it never happened.