Re: The Name-Calling, Slandering, and our sense of Morality
It is really funny situation with Pakistani politicians, cronies of politicians, and Pakistanis on payroll of these politicians.
These people love commissions, kickbacks, robbery, briberies, corruption, taking loan not to return, lies, making fool of masses, nepotism, family rule, illegal actions, living and getting treated above law, plot grabbing, looting, plundering, misuse of power, exploitation, VIP treatment, Protocols, etc, etc, etc .. but when people want to remember them from what they do and call them what they are, these thugs get agitated, angry, upset, and want people not to remind them what they do and what they are … rather, want people to keep quite and give them respect (something they do not want to earn, rather lose with every action they do).
But, how can that happen?
When a person rob then that person should be prepared to be called robber, and same way … these politicians should be prepared to be called what they are.
Politicians should know that it is one of the hazard of politics that nothing personal of a person stays personal … as what is personal to them is only valid as long as they cannot effect the lives of others, but politicians effect lives of others, hence nothing about their personal life is personal to them.
Just imagine … crooks cannot say that no one remind people that they are crooks … because if people would not call them crook, their crimes would be away from the sight and knowledge of people, and in that case unaware person might make a crook manager of their business, where this crook would rob and harm that person.
Just think … if ‘Mr A’ know that ‘Mr B’ is womaniser and rapist and still' Mr A' keep quiet about 'MR B' then ‘Mr C’ who could be relative, friend, or associate of 'Mr A' might hire ‘Mr B’ (womaniser and rapist) to be tutor of his daughter and then 'Mr B' could rape daughter of 'Mr C'. … then obviously in that rape, 'Mr A' is also responsible and equally guilty, as by not calling 'Mr B' womaniser and rapist, 'Mr A' has helped 'Mr B' to get job of tutor and thus manage to rape daughter of 'Mr C'. Hence it is social and moral duty of 'Mr A' to call 'Mr B', womaniser and rapist, so that unwary people like 'Mr C' get aware.
Same is true about corrupt thugs in Pakistani politics. If we do not call them what they are (corrupt thugs) then they would loot and plunder the country with much more impunity then when they are called what they are (corrupt thugs), and in that case, we would be responsible (as helper) of that loot and plunder too.
So my advice to politicians and all who would like to be in public offices is that … they do not do anything that can give excuse to people to call them with unlikable names, and if they want to do things that are unlikable, then they should not cry if they are called what they do and what they are.
Note: Even though personally I do not usually call Thug Nawaz … as Ganja or Tind … and it is not right to call anyone Ganja … if his Ganja-pan is natural and that person has accepted that Ganja-pan as God given (something that is due to genetic reason) … but thugs like Nawaz who spent millions of looted money to cover up their Ganja-pan then they included their Ganja-pan in corruption too … making it valid for people to call them Ganja or Tind].
