The Indian Terms

[nikhil25]

@CM

No who said conventional war? You see the beauty of modern warfare is not conventional anymore. Its guerilla warfare. You build a dam on a river contrary to your international obligations. It may just develop cracks or a hole or something.

Water is the fight of the 21st Century. Oil was this last century. Water for the future. And countries will do whatever is necessary for it.

you’re right…i forgot that in pakistani military parlance, “going to war” means sneaking in some ineffective jihadis and hoping for a miracle that never comes.

good luck to the jihadis on blowing up indian dams. and good luck to pakistani farmers on learning how to grow vegetables 10 feet under water.

[CM]

Re: The Indian Terms

sigh Who said it would be us. What about China eh? Oh yeah lets not forget you guys can’t build anything worthwhile?

But the question is why are you violating your commitments under the Indus Water Basin Treaty?

[Punjabee_in_USA]

@""CM""

But the question is why are you violating your commitments under the Indus Water Basin Treaty?

Read up on the treaty before posting.

It contains provisions for India to establish river-run power projects with limited reservoir capacity and flow control needed for feasible power generation. Unlike Pak, India is a growing economy and our power needs are huge.

[queer]

Re: The Indian Terms

this is the second time on this thread C-“polypropylene”-M has been unable to even name the treaty correctly. forget understanding the terms in it. yawn..

[queer]

@hanibal

Unlike Indians, We the Pakistanies normally do not take the word of our leaders as final, we try to find out ground realities, and this time we can check it out by ourselves…

i see. and if this is the case, what is the reason pakistanis end up with leaders like bhutto/zardari, sharifs, chaudhary brothers - not once, but over and over?

you over-estimate your ability to challenge anything your land-owning class sets forth for you as national agenda.

[Ambassador1]

Doom & destruction of Pakistan & Pakistanis. What else do you think has been india’s top most agenda for the last 60 years? Why should they stop now that the mafia which supports the state of israel also supports india because both share the same idealogy?

@hanibal

This is whole point, Indians need to realize that the way they are handling things will lead to doom and nothing else..

[Punjabee_in_USA]

@Ambassador1

Doom & destruction of Pakistan & Pakistanis. What else do you think has been india’s top most agenda for the last 60 years? Why should they stop now that the mafia which supports the state of israel also supports india because both share the same idealogy?

If that was India’s agenda, we would have finished Pak 60 yrs ago. Why wait 60 + yrs till both countries have nukes ?

[Ambassador1]

‘we would have finished Pak…’ who is this ‘we’ claiming to have God’s attribute? dajjal /anti christ?

I have repeatedly said over these forums india is anti christ.

@Punjabee_in_USA

If that was India’s agenda, we would have finished Pak 60 yrs ago…

[queer]

Re: The Indian Terms

lol@anti-christ.

[mo293]

@Punjabee_in_USA

If that was India’s agenda, we would have finished Pak 60 yrs ago. Why wait 60 + yrs till both countries have nukes ?

I am sure you would have finished China too… LMAO…

[beHind]

@Ambassador1

Doom & destruction of Pakistan & Pakistanis. What else do you think has been india’s top most agenda for the last 60 years? Why should they stop now that the mafia which supports the state of israel also supports india because both share the same idealogy?

D:D all your worst enemies are co-conspirators against the charming state of pakistan

[hanibal]

@queer

i see. and if this is the case, what is the reason pakistanis end up with leaders like bhutto/zardari, sharifs, chaudhary brothers - not once, but over and over?

you over-estimate your ability to challenge anything your land-owning class sets forth for you as national agenda.

Oh i forgot, you are an Indian, an over hyped indian, who thinks only he is capable of estimating things, no wonder there are half a dozen freedom movements going on … yes there is nothing wrong in India and indian leadership, keep worshiping the brahmins, i think thats what your religion teaches you as well…

AS far as bhutto and zardari and others are concerned, Bhutto himself was not that bad at all and that is why there still some support for him, as far as Zardari is concerned, he didn’t have got any support in Pakistan, yes in India a daughter in law of Italian origin does enjoy the support of the masses not because of her ability but because she is Daughter in law…

[hanibal]

@Punjabee_in_USA

If that was India’s agenda, we would have finished Pak 60 yrs ago. Why wait 60 + yrs till both countries have nukes ?

And you were not trying ??? remembers wars between the two countries, do you think they are for fun purposes only???

[xephyr]

@hanibal

And you were not trying ??? remembers wars between the two countries, do you think they are for fun purposes only???

Remember, India did not rub those wars on Pakistan! Pakistan always tried/is trying to disturb India.

[CM]

Re: The Indian Terms

Actually incorrect. 1971 and 1965 India crossed the International border with their armed forces. The very basic definition of aggression and starting a war.

[mercenary2k]

@hanibal

Oh i forgot, you are an Indian, an over hyped indian, who thinks only he is capable of estimating things, no wonder there are half a dozen freedom movements going on … yes there is nothing wrong in India and indian leadership, keep worshiping the brahmins, i think thats what your religion teaches you as well…

AS far as bhutto and zardari and others are concerned, Bhutto himself was not that bad at all and that is why there still some support for him, as far as Zardari is concerned, he didn’t have got any support in Pakistan, yes in India a daughter in law of Italian origin does enjoy the support of the masses not because of her ability but because she is Daughter in law…

Hanibal, how many coups have we had compared to India?

India despite its faults is a much stable government due to power being de-centralized in India where as in Pakistan, the power is concentrated in Punjab.

[hanibal]

@mercenary2k

Hanibal, how many coups have we had compared to India?

India despite its faults is a much stable government due to power being de-centralized in India where as in Pakistan, the power is concentrated in Punjab.

Please read the topic and the replies.. try not to DE-rail the topic in other directions, however if you have urge to discuss what you are saying in your post, please open a new thread for it…

Happy thread opening

[Punjabee_in_USA]

@hanibal

And you were not trying ??? remembers wars between the two countries, do you think they are for fun purposes only???

I repeat - if we had tried, we would have finished Pak off in 1948 (right after the British left). So irrespective of the BS thats taught to you, the fact is that we did not try.

[Aussindian]

Re: The Indian Terms

In 1974, India tested the ‘peaceful’ atom bomb!!.
Pakistan started developing it thereafter, and which took 10 - 15 years.

If India wanted to, it could have destroyed Pakistan during 1974 to mid 1980s..
So I do believe that India has no intentions of destroying Pakistan.

[Salahuddin_Ayyubi]

@Aussindian

In 1974, India tested the ‘peaceful’ atom bomb!!.
Pakistan started developing it thereafter, and which took 10 - 15 years.

If India wanted to, it could have destroyed Pakistan during 1974 to mid 1980s..
So I do believe that India has no intentions of destroying Pakistan.

What India tested was a device out of US/Canadian provided technology which had no practical purpose at that time. It was a device the size of a house… Minaturization takes lot of time and skill even today Indians themself are not sure of their yields. Rest assured India could have and should have is nothing but all hot air and a wet dream.