The hypocrisy of liberals

[m7md]

Re: The hypocrisy of liberals

@Reha

Controlling a woman does not make a man a man. It makes him a non-man to feel empowered by oppressing others. Men who generally lack in many areas of life always try to oppress women. Oppression is the only tool they have. They don’t possess much else of worth and are afraid someone else will figure it out too.

Now if they could control other MEN, that would make them a real man. But I doubt they have it in them.

And again, those conditions are NOT prohibitions. They are simply guidelines to follow so as not to disrupt harmony for both people.

Let’s say she chooses not to work…she still has the right to a cook, maid, nanny and pretty much anything financially she chooses. She can twiddle her thumbs all day or watch soap operas and he would have no right to question because she is not obligated to take care of his children. She has the right to demand and he is obligated to fulfill.

So instead of going through all that, most women end up being reasonable and only ask for what their husbands can afford. And this attitude is what kills them.

I have no idea why Pakistani women are happy on the day of their wedding…a guy gives you a nice outfit and some jewelry so you can bring a boatload of Jahaiz with you, then come and take care of his brother, his sister, cook, clean, raise his kids, wash his clothes and take care of his parents that even he cannot stand.

So the females in Pakistan BUY (jahaiz) their husbands and their responsibilities.

From a purely financial standpoint, marriage in Pakistan is a terrible deal for women but a very lucrative one for men.

In a good and harmonious society its never men vs women, but the good people against the bad.

Sure controlling a woman doenst make a man more of a man coz in the things allowed its his right, and for him to prove superiority in society he should influence other men towards the good. But again speaking of the word control doesnt ever mean robotic control, its more like a leadership role.
Oppression is completely different then control, similar to how a government controls a state vs a gov oppressing its ppl, dont look at both of them in the same light. There is significant different. A gov control of its people is for the wellbeing of its ppl taking their interests in account.

From the aggressive point you are mentioning that she has no right to care for his kids, well in such guidelines then if the future women has no right to talk in the marriage prospects of their children as well, will that also be accepted? See again its not a fight
And further more a woman does not have a right to demand medical care from her husband as well under sharia law, is always remember challenging authority of a superior will always leave one in a greater loss, compromise and negotiations, more over mutual understanding is always the best policy.

And similarly men should also be reasonable men enough and work dedicatedly in their role as men to provide best for their families.

In my family atleast we dont take jezhez (which we call baghairti) nor do barat so im out of this, such is honestly a disgrace for a man.
And taking care of his brothers is sick and should be stopped. Sufficient care of his parents is fine if its not oppressive.

As you mentioned it is, but u will be surprised even when we tell the girls family we dont want anything how reluctant they are to give, as first they think we are just saying for image lol then they want to give so their other family members e.g. other women’s husband dont feel bad haha, as if they were so conscious of it in the first place, they y take it… anyhow this is personal stuff. But we still dont take anything.