The Great Democratic Nation called India

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Reza are u in pakistan, its not 16 million, 160 million.

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Yes ofcourse.. :D. Just like isrealies labeling hezb terrorist.:). Can u be consistant sometimes.:D

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

hezbollah are terrorist in nature such as the deliberate firing of rockets to kill Jewish people, the bombing of Israeli Embassy in Argentina, etc..

But the Kashmiri Freedom Fighters confine their fight to the Indian army and never harm civilians

the bombing in Bombay was the work of Muslims from Bombay who were angry at the way they were treated....

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

In 60 years u started 3 wars against India. U lost half of your country and half of ur population.
What standard are u talking about. Our middle class is twice the size of pakistan population itself. There is equal oppertunity for everybody to prosper. The rich manage to get richer but people who are hard working can succeed. There are many examples of such people.

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Where, in Baloch?

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India


oh sure they not..:). Should i provide you with links how many nrmal citizens ur "freedom fighters" have killed.

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Hahaha. Good joke

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

be my guest

and i will also provide counter arguments that those people were killed by RAW to taint the noble freedom fighters

just like the pathetic attempt to curry favours with Clinton when your troops killed 30 sikhs and blamed it on the freedom fighters

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Nice joke, again....

:D You seem to be in good mood - telling a lot of jokes.

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Pls provide links, not arguements. We have no dearth of ‘creative’ arguements from you on other threads :cb:

Btw, you have still not responded to the stupid thread you started on how Sikhs are migrating from India :smiley:

And what about your claim that the Montreal shooter was Hindu ?:cb::cb:

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

And then u blame the conspiracy theorist here for mudslinging Isreal and US. Is that again consistancy.:)

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

you seem to be in even a more funny mood, accepting facts as jokes

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Nope I do not....

There are some logical deduction which can applied to arrive at a general consesus....

For example, I suspected that Russia blew up those buildings in Moscow to launch the Russian-Chechen War and I was right. the FSB blew up the buildings in 1999

Same with when Clinton came to India and he even acknowledged it in his book that India was responsible for the killing of 30 sikhs

I do beleive that Osama and Al Qaeda was behind 9/11 because having lived in the Arab World for 12 years and knowing their mentailty, inside and out....

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

You have opinions here, no facts

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Clinton what!!.. selective reporting is worse than no reporting. U dont have any idea that clinton retraced his statments and he made such statment without any basic proof.:D

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

There, facts

http://www.khalistan.com/PressReleases/PR053006_ClintonSaysHinduMilitantsMurderedSikhs.htm

“Hindu Militants Murdered 38 Sikhs in Cold Blood”
Clinton: India Responsible for Chithisinghpora Massacre

WASHINGTON, D.C., May 30, 2006 – In the introduction to former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright’s new book, The Mighty and the Almighty, former U.S. President Bill Clinton writes that “Hindu militants” are responsible for the massacre of 38 Sikhs at Chithisinghpora in March 2000. This reflects previous findings by the Punjab Human Rights Organization, the International Human Rights Organization, the Movement Against State Repression, and New York Times reporter Barry Bearak.

President Clinton writes, “During my visit to India in 2000, some Hindu militants decided to vent their outrage by murdering 38 Sikhs in cold blood. If I hadn’t made the trip, the victims would probably still be alive. If I hadn’t made the trip because I feared what militants might do, I couldn’t have done my job as president of the United States.”

According to Amnesty International, “the attackers wore uniforms of the armed forces and were led by a tall man whom they addressed as Commanding Officer (CO). All Sikh men were rounded up, ostensibly to check their identities, and made to sit on the ground in two groups against the walls of the gurdwaras [Sikh temples] a few hundred metres from each other; they were shot at point blank range. As the attackers withdrew, they reportedly shouted Hindu slogans.” On August 2, 2002, the Washington Times reported that the Indian government admitted that its forces were responsible for the massacre. India finally admitted that the evidence it used to implicate alleged Kashmiri “militants” in the murders was faked.

At the time of the Chithisinghpora massacre, Dr. Gurmit Singh Aulakh, President of the Council of Khalistan, strongly condemned the murders. “What motive would Kashmiri freedom fighters have to kill Sikhs? This would be especially stupid when President Clinton is visiting. The freedom movements in Kashmir, Khalistan, Nagaland, and throughout India need the support of the United States,” he said. Khalistan is the Sikh homeland declared independent on October 7, 1987.

The massacres continued a pattern of repression and terrorism against minorities by the Indian government, which it attempts to blame on other minorities to divide and rule the minority peoples within its artificial borders. The Indian newspaper Hitavada reported that the Indian government paid the late governor of Punjab, Surendra Nath, $1.5 billion to organize and support covert terrorist activity in Punjab, Khalistan, and in neighboring Kashmir.

A report issued by the Movement Against State Repression (MASR) shows that India admitted that it held 52,268 political prisoners under the repressive “Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Act” (TADA) even though it expired in 1995. Many have been in illegal custody since 1984. There has been no list published of those who were acquitted under TADA and those who are still rotting in Indian jails. Additionally, according to Amnesty International, there are tens of thousands of other minorities being held as political prisoners. MASR report quotes the Punjab Civil Magistracy as writing “if we add up the figures of the last few years the number of innocent persons killed would run into lakhs [hundreds of thousands.]”

The Indian government has murdered over 250,000 Sikhs since 1984, more than 300,000 Christians in Nagaland, over 90,000 Muslims in Kashmir, tens of thousands of Christians and Muslims throughout the country, and tens of thousands of Tamils, Assamese, Manipuris, , and others. The Indian Supreme Court called the Indian government’s murders of Sikhs "worse than a genocide.”

The book Soft Target by Canadian journalists Zuhair Kashmeri and Brian McAndrew , shows that the Indian government blew up its own airliner in 1985 to blame Sikhs and justify further repression. It quotes an agent of the Canadian Security Investigation Service (CSIS) as saying, “If you really want to clear up the incidents quickly, take vans down to the Indian High Commission and the consulates in Toronto and Vancouver. We know it and they know it that they are involved.” On January 2, 2002, the Washington Times reported that India sponsors cross-border terrorism in the Pakistani province of Sindh.

“Only in a free Khalistan will the Sikh Nation prosper and get justice,” said Dr. Aulakh. “When Khalistan is free, we will have our own Ambassadors, our own representation in the UN and other international bodies, and our own leaders to keep this sort of thing from happening. We won’t be at the mercy of the brutal Indian regime and its Hindu militant allies,” he said. “Democracies don’t commit genocide. India should act like a democracy and allow a plebiscite on independence for Khalistan and all the nations of South Asia,” Dr. Aulakh said. “We must free Khalistan now.”

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

^This is what i meant by selective reporting. why dont u post the refutal
too please..:).

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

LOL - Khalistan.com . good one.

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

Here are some latest indicators [Comparison for one governance indicator across a number of countries] from world bank that might help -
http://info.worldbank.org/governance/kkz2005/mc_indicator.asp
There is one indocator “Voice and Accountability” in which even Pakistan stands better than China -

Re: The Great Democratic Nation called India

The only reason that clinton retracted his statement is because the usa-india nuclear deal was in the works and that statement which was the truth pissed off many indians

understandably, when the crimes of the imperialist indians is revealed it undoubtly causes bad press for india

And every Sikh on the planet blames Hindus for the massacare