The emerging profile of India

This is an editorial in today’s Dawn(a pro-government newspaper from karachi)

The emerging profile of India

By Tayyab Siddiqui
PRIOR to the advent of new millennium, political pundits and economic experts had predicted that the 21st century would be the Asian century. The judgment was based on the tremendous potential and phenomenal progress achieved by Japan, China and the Asean nations. The economic tigers posted a growth rate of 10 per cent for over a decade, giving rise to a new paradigm of stability and influence.

India has now joined the race. The vibrancy of its economy and resilience of its democracy has ushered in a new era of India’s regional leadership, and growing role in global politics. In a recent press conference Chinese premier Wen Jiabo alluded to this role calling it the ‘Sino-Indian century’.

India is going through a remarkable transformation both internally (in terms of rapid and high economic growth) and externally (with its growing political importance). The major powers are wooing India as never before. The US is committed to help it become a “major world power in the 21st century,” while China, France and Russia are keen to enlist India as a strategic partner. The US strategic engagement is based on growing economic links, shared values of liberal democracy and India’s being a “responsible nuclear power”.

India’s growing world stature and geo-political role is primarily due to its economic growth and political stability. India’s economy is poised to take off with a consistent GDP growth of six per cent and a population growth rate that has reduced to 1.3 per cent. According to the Indian Planning Commission, poverty has declined by 10 per cent both in the rural and urban areas. India’s imports and exports as a share of its economy have increased from 13 to 23 per cent in the last decade. Foreign direct investment is increasing at a phenomenal rate. India’s software exports are growing at a rate of 50 per cent per year, thanks to its expanding information technology workforce. Almost $9 billion investment has been made in 2005 by major international conglomerates Microsoft, Intel Corp. and Cisco Systems.

India is today the world’s fastest growing major mobile phone market, with 72 million mobile users. A recent Goldman Sachs study has predicted that in 10 years India’s economy would be larger than Italy’s and in 15 years, it would have overtaken that of Britain’s. In the next 40 years, India’s per capita income will increase 35 times. The explosion of technical research schools with international standards have fuelled the economic miracle. In 2005 India produced 200,000 engineering graduates, three times as many as the US and twice as many as the whole of Europe. Last year, India enrolled 450,000 students for the four year engineering degree courses.

These developments have given Indian leadership an unprecedented confidence in the country’s future and its capacity to play an influential role on the world stage. Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, in his enunciation of India’s foreign policy on February 25, 2005, stressed India’s “inclusive, open, multiethnic and multilingual society” that was “ready to defend these values abroad”. Business and commerce were identified as the anchor of relations with Europe and the US, and in the neighbourhood, the policy of ‘look East’ became the driving force of forging close relations with China, Japan and Asean.

The most impressive breakthrough has been made in its ties with the US. Manmohan Singh’s Washington visit in July last year was a watershed in bilateral relations. The joint statement spelled out the landmark nature of the visit with unprecedented cooperation in the spheres of economy, technology, energy and defence. The two leaders agreed on a wide-ranging cooperation as “global partners” building on “their common values and mutual visions and joint objectives as strong longstanding democracies”, taking their relations to a qualitatively unprecedented higher plane.

The centrepiece of US-India strategic ties is the agreement signed during President Bush’s visit under which the US agreed to accord India the “same benefits and advantages as other nuclear states”, indirectly recognizing India as a nuclear weapon state. In return India would identify and separate civilian and nuclear facilities in a phased manner, and voluntarily place its civilian facilities under IAEA safeguards.

The Bush visit covered an ambitious agenda, the areas of cooperation included energy, agriculture, science and technology, health and environment, befitting a “strategic partnership” built upon, in the words of President Bush, “our common values, our two democracies, respect for religious pluralism and the rule of law.” The US shift towards India reflects the US belief that as an emerging Asian superpower India may serve as a counterweight to China, though it has been expressed in terms of “our common principles and shared national interests. “

Besides its geo-strategic importance, India has been discovered as an important investment destination with good prospects for major US multinationals particularly in IT. Microsoft committed $400 million in 2002 and $1.7 billion last year. US exports to India have increased by 30 per cent annually. Two-way trade is now in excess of $26 billion, up by 88 per cent since 2000.

Politically, India’s clout and influence in the US has increased phenomenally during the last few years. The Indian caucus in the US Congress has 120 members in a house of 435. There are two million Indians living in America and about 80,000 Americans in India, mostly working for US firms doing business there.

The transformation of Sino-India relations is equally dramatic. Relations between the two nations had been characterized by mutual suspicion and hostility since the last many decades. Since the India-China war of 1962 relations remained cool until 1988, when after a lapse of 25 years Rajiv Gandhi paid a visit to Beijing. However, the real breakthrough came in April 2005, when Chinese premier Wen Jiabao visited Delhi.

In a rare display of flexibility and pragmatism, India decided to move forward and agreed to “meaningful and mutually acceptable adjustments” on the border issue. The joint working groups have been asked to settle the issue in a spirit of “friendship and cooperation”. It was also decided to increase the present level of $14 billion trade. India decided to designate 2006 as the “year of friendship with China”. Another potential area of cooperation is in joint biddings for energy resources to eliminate competition as both desperately need energy resources to meet their ever-increasing requirements for their expanding economies.

India’s growing interest and involvement in South East Asia, reflected in its membership of Asean Regional Forum and as a dialogue partner of Saarc, is a manifestation of its ‘look East’ policy to widen the scope of its economic and political interests in the region. India also looks upon East Asia to expand its navy’s blue water capability.

Russia has been a traditional friend and trusted partner since the early years of Indian independence. It had close political and strategic relations with India. These relations flowered in all directions during the Soviet Union days, also because Indian relations with the US in those Cold War days were limited in scope.

India has joint defence projects with Russia for manufacturing SU-30 fighter jets and T-90 tanks and Brahmos anti-ship missiles. India is also considering investment in energy sector, particularly oil explorations in Siberia and Sakhalin-3. Other agreements signed allow India the use of the Russian navigation system made up of 14 satellites, known as Glonass. India has also entered into negotiations with Russia for the supply of four nuclear reactors of 1000 MW each for its Koondun Kalam power plant.

Moscow and Delhi have also agreed to hold their joint military and naval exercises every year and the 1996 defence pact has been upgraded, to permit the sale of nuclear reactors, after the Nuclear Suppliers Group has cleared the US deal. Russia supported India’s bid for a permanent seat in the Security Council and favours its request for permanent membership in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization — a regional grouping of Central Asian states, Russia and China.

Relations with France received a major boost during President Jacques Chirac’s visit (Feb 19, 2006). A number of agreements were signed, including one on defence cooperation and the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. The French president’s visit after seven years is being regarded as an extremely important event. Chirac was accompanied by five key cabinet ministers and 30 CEOs of major French companies.

To give political substance to its ambitions, India, which is emerging as a global power, is working hard to get a permanent berth on UNSC and joining the G-8, to establish its credentials as a big power. According to US under Secretary Nicholas Burns, “India is a rising economic confluence of power in the international system. It is emerging as a potentially very stabilizing and positive force in international politics. India is a rising global power. Within the first quarter of this century, it is likely to be numbered among the world’s largest economies. It will soon be the world’s most populous nation and it has a demographic structure that bequeaths it a huge, skilled and youthful workforce.”

The growing partnership between the US and India, in the years to come, will bear a very critical influence on the region. While critics are sceptical of the nuclear deal going through there are strong US economic interests that will eventually prevail. Regardless of the outcome of the nuclear deal, mutual stakes will continue to grow. It was not without reason that Manmohan Singh exulted at the joint press conference with Bush on March 2, “We have made history today.”

The writer is a former ambassador

Re: The emerging profile of India

yeah.. India is doing well...

Re: The emerging profile of India

Move to world affairs plz

Re: The emerging profile of India

One of the major reason's for India's success has been the removal of most feudal, tribal, and extremist (BJP being an exception) forces from maintream politics.

Re: The emerging profile of India

West Bengal instituted land reforms and still remains a basket case. Congress-I slogan against feudal was always targeting Muslims land owners. Why? Number of Hindu or Sikh landowners were a tiny minority in the British Indian provinces. Whatever land Hindus owned was in the form of Princely states that were not part of the British government.

People who raise anti-land owner slogans are simply lefti commies who have no idea about the ownership.

Bharati progress is utterly dependent on a Pro-USA anti-socialist stance in the last 15-20 years. Both Congress and BJP have followed these policies.

As long as Bharat remains loyal to USA, its economy will thrive. That in fact is a lesson from Chinese development as well. Loyalty to USA is the key to progress in this age.

Talking about China, it has done manifold better compared to Bharat. Same population, similar resources, yet China is reaching $500 billion a year earning while Bharat remains stuck at $50 billion. The reason is simple, Bharat is primarily a country of Baboos and Munshis. They are good at serving as an office secretary so we see all these call centers and BPO money.

Chinese on the other hand are much better at making things. Who can forget Chinese silk industry that has thrived for thousands of years. Silk-routes were the key in global trade even 1000 years ago. Bharat on the other hand was never a major industrial player.

For Pakistan, there are many lessons to be learned. But the first and foremost is for Pakistanis to be the most loyal to USA if they ever want to compete in global trade.

Re: The emerging profile of India

Lack of proper democracy is hampering Pakistan... Democracy and the prosperity that comes of it, can do a lot to gradually reduce the feudal influence in the country.

Re: The emerging profile of India

The reason is simple, Bharat is primarily a country of Baboos and Munshis. They are good at serving as an office secretary so we see all these call centers and BPO money.

China and India do more than make t-shirts and cheap sheet metal. Domestically, their rate of research, development and funding for training engineers has skyrocketed. Abroad, they have begun going after Western companies to acquire new technologies, just as Mittal is doing.

http://watchingamerica.com/lefigaro000085.shtml

Re: The emerging profile of India

The main point of this article is that Pakis are now getting used to the idea of India being the region's "super power".

Re: The emerging profile of India

Yeah so? Unlike akhroot mentality, sometimes its a good think to realize your opponents power and learn from their success.

Re: The emerging profile of India

One more point is that Indians are succeeding because the majority of them are not feudal or tribal in nature, unlike much of Pakistan, especially west of the Indus.

Re: The emerging profile of India

Totally agree with you my friend, its time we let go of all this racial and provincial non-sense and follow the opponents moves to make it big.

Re: The emerging profile of India

Oh yes the super-intelligent Punjabi-Muhajir junta that ruled Pakistan since its inception wanted to make it into a state that the world would envy for its stable economy and politics, democracy, moderation, liberalism, freedom of thought and expression, and religious tolerance but we "akhroot" were the impedement....And also this junta wanted to learn from the outcome of 1948 (state-sponsored infiltration into Kashmir), 1965 (operation Gibraltor), 1971 (War on Bangalis---they had said kill three millions of them and they would eat from our hands), 1999 (Kargal) wars but we "akhroot" again were the hurdle...And last but not the least they wanted to learn from the futile Startegic Depth Operation in Afghanistan (ultimately proving to be strategic debacle), Kashmir Operation ( 1988 to 2002), Khalistan but because of us, "akhroot"....This all in addition to the fact that because of "akhroots", 7 constitutions were nullified (so the state now is virtually without a constitution) and institutions were melted down...

Expel all "akhroot" and let the wise Punjabi-Muhajir junta to transform the state according to their "vision" !

Hurry up before it is too late!

Re: The emerging profile of India

The seed of all the problems was sown when in 1950s, Punjabi and Muhajirs joined hands to sideline the Bangali majority and the smaller groups like Pashtuns, Sindhis, and Baluchis...Imposition of One unit is an evidence of the foul play...

Re: The emerging profile of India

Cheers to that!! Good to note Pakistan already is doing better (refer other thread on Pakistan success).

Re: The emerging profile of India

you want to turn this thread into another race/ethnicity bashing thread.

You didnot include the pashtuns and blame only punjabis and muhajirs for 71 debacle.Muhajirs were only 3 to 4 % of undivided pakistan.pashtuns were a percent or two more.anyway people blame punjabis for 71 because obviously they were the majority in the establishment but one cant deny that other ethnicities also helped them.It was west pakistan against east pakistan and pashtuns were no different.

You guys talk about sharing your roots with persia who was yahya khan he was persian speaking.who was gen niazi,a niazi from mianwali.bhutto was sindhi.

I think we all regret what happened in 71 it waqs the attitude of all the west pakistanis with the bengalis and obviously our enemy took advantage of the situation

Re: The emerging profile of India

Surely india is more democratic than us and fuedal system doesnot exist in india.The central government has somewhat controlled the ethno linguistic tensions.Education standard is definitely better than us and the literacy rate.

But india has to do more to protect its minorities which the state has oppressed.Muslims, religious minorities and the dalits who are persecuted and discriminated.

Re: The emerging profile of India

Too bad this thread is turning into an ethno-bashing pipe.

Look the "stability" and not "democracy" is the key to the development of any country. However if there is a "stable democracy", then it is just icing on the cake.

Wal mart doesn't care who is ruling Dilli, Beigjing, Seol, or Islamabad. They don't care what the prevailing religion is, or if the locals eat Daal, Saag, or Gosht. The only thing matters for Walmart is that they place an order, and get the delivery on time.

Wal mart may be looking for "industrial products". However the "service-sector" works pretty much the same way. If you receive a call form America, and you say "Welcome to Dell. Hi my name is Mike, How can I help you"? Then Dell doesn't care if your real name is Baboo raam, Tamizuddin Beg, or Chaudhry Akram. Dell doesn't care if you had 2 years long democracy or 60 years old demo-crazy. Heck if Chinese accent was little better, Dell would put their tech support in GwangJO in a heart beat.

Corporations focus on running an efficient business. They don't care about religion or politics. If you could support them any way, they will come to you.

That is why world's worst known dictatroship i.e. China does 10 to 15 times more business with the West compared to the "world's biggest demo-crazy". So be loyal to the West particulary to the USA, and you will get the "outsourcing" business in no time.

Re: The emerging profile of India

what make you think what works in china will work in india/pakistan?
would pakistanis accept one child policy forced abortions? ofcourse you can
mathamatically improve gnp by preventing more babies being born would islam accept such a ideology?

Re: The emerging profile of India

Oh Baboo Raam! you got the point and now just trying to stretch the debate.

What makes you think what works for Bharatis will also work for Pakistan / China?

As I said, Bharatis are good at being office-baboo. Welcome to Dell tech support, Hi My name is Mike (or Baboo Raam etc) , How can I help you?

Chinese can't say all that so they "make" things for Wal Mart. Bottom line, they get paid more per hour or they make more things. The result is Chinese make 10 to 15 times more a year comapred to Bharat.

Every country has it own policy to get rid of "undersirables". China has one child policy and Bharatis get rid of Muslims with every Babri and Gujarat.

Re: The emerging profile of India

Funny how people have selective memory about the facts above