The Bush family, they just don't get it.

Let’s look at the facts, you have man who is President and thinks it’s okay to take a 5 week vacation while the country wages war in Iraq and Afghanistan and then goes on with his vacation after finding out that a massive hurricane unlike one seen before is heading directly towards New Orleans. Could you produce a T.V. character like this and make it believable? But this behavior is now making more sense after you hear what Barbra Bush had to say about the victims of Katrina. The apple sure doesn’t fall far from the tree does it?

Comments about Hurricane Katrina victims by the mother of President George Bush have fuelled the ire of some Americans, who see the Bush family as out-of-touch patricians.

The refugees in Houston, Texas, were “underprivileged anyway” and life in the Astrodome sports arena is “working very well for them”, former first lady Barbara Bush said in a radio interview.

"Almost everyone I’ve talked to says: ‘We’re going to move to Houston,’ " Mrs Bush said late on Monday after visiting evacuees at the Astrodome with her husband, former president George Bush.

“What I’m hearing, which is sort of scary, is they all want to stay in Texas. Everyone is so overwhelmed by the hospitality,” she said.

“And so many of the people in the arena here, you know, were underprivileged anyway, so this - this is working very well for them.”

Her comments were aired on Marketplace, an American Public Radio show broadcast nationwide.

They triggered a flood of negative messages on the Huffington Post, a popular left-leaning blog.

“Cold hearted witch,” read one of the more polite comments, signed by IowaDem.

“No wonder her son remained on vacation, playing guitar and eating cake instead of seeing that aid and rescue operations were well-managed.”

Another writer found the comments hard to believe. “Did she really say that?” wrote ‘Stephen.’ “My God! What or who have we become?”

Meanwhile, “Katrinagate” fury has spread to US media.

“For God’s sake, are you blind?” a woman shouted at Michael Brown, the head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). “You’re patting each other on the back, while people here are dying.”

The woman was not a victim of Hurricane Katrina. She was a reporter with US television network MSNBC who was so affected by the misery she had witnessed she could hold back no longer.

“Katrinagate” is the term being used by the media to describe the biggest challenge facing the political establishment in the US since the Watergate affair in the 1970s toppled Richard Nixon.

Not for decades has there been such merciless questioning of the President and his Administration by the US media.

Even now, as the rescue operation gets under way in earnest and the flood waters in New Orleans are starting to subside, the Federal Government’s inadequate reaction - in the run-up to the hurricane and directly afterwards - is still being criticised by the media in reports that are anything but detached.

Never before, say some observers, have US reporters been so emotionally involved in a story to the point of being enraged. They are not just telling a story, they have become part of it.

“Has Katrina saved the US media?” asked BBC reporter Matt Wells, who sees the shift in tone as a potentially historic development.

A number of US journalists who cover federal politics, especially television presenters, had become part of the political establishment, said Wells.

“They live in the same suburbs, go to the same parties. Their television companies are owned by large conglomerates who contribute to election campaigns.”

It’s a “perfect recipe” for fearful, self-censoring reportage, he said, but added: “Since last week, that’s all over.”

But if the Bush Administration’s reaction to Hurricane Katrina was slow, so too was the media’s.

On Friday, reporters at the scene were still having difficulties establishing the scale of the disaster and the number of dead.

Used to reporting on comparatively harmless storms, heroically riding out the storms with windblown hairdos, they were then confronted with the “Big One”.

The television reporters, particularly, were left scrambling in the first few hours of coverage as they tried to comprehend the scale of the disaster.

Then came the emotion. A CNN reporter broke down as she described the cries of help of people stuck on rooftops in Louisiana. Other journalists also related what they saw in broken voices.

Then the federal officials rolled into town and the press conferences started, with politicians thanking one another for their tireless efforts.

Next came anger. “This isn’t Iraq, this isn’t Somalia, this is our home,” one NBC television reporter shouted.

The usually stoic ABC television presenter Ted Koeppel lashed out at the FEMA head in a interview, when he could not give any details on the number of refugees waiting to be rescued from the Convention Centre.

“Don’t you people ever look at television?” the veteran presenter raged. “Don’t you ever hear the radio? We’ve been reporting on the crisis at the Convention Centre for a lot longer than just today.”

A CNN journalist also attacked Brown. “How it is possible that we have better information than you? Why aren’t supplies being dropped in [by plane]? In Banda Aceh, in Indonesia, they did it two days after the tsunami.”

Another CNN reporter interrupted Senator Mary Landrieu during an interview in which she was praising Congress for passing an emergency aid package.

“Excuse me Senator, I’m sorry for interrupting. I haven’t heard anything about that, because I was busy these past four days seeing dead people on the street. And when I hear how one politician congratulating the others … Yesterday there was a corpse on the street which had been eaten by rats because it had been there for 48 hours.”

If the alarm bells are not already going off in the Oval Office, they should be, because the previously staunchly pro-Bush Fox News is also starting to show signs of disaffection.

As one of their reporters was being directed to another area because of the danger caused by looting, he spoke quickly into his microphone, saying: “These people are desperate. Why shouldn’t they try to steal water and food from us?”

http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/barbara-bush-comments-on-survivors-spark-outrage/2005/09/07/1125772563296.html

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

I tell you what it is. Old age. Maybe she isnt thinking properly anymore. Signs of Alzheimer?

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

^
And Dubya's excuse?

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

Ahem. Dubya does and says what bunker dude tells him to. And he is old too :clown:

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

It is not a familial issue, it is senility. GW is very unlike his dad GH. GH is much more moderate and frankly my kind of republican than GW is. He is more of a california republican topped off with a cherry of fundo christian lunacy.

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

All is well in Crawford Ranch, what are you bunch talkin about? There is no hurricane.

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

You mean the dad and not GW here, right?

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

the so-called rescue operation showed a bunch of men dressed in green talking to the cameramen about how much work they had to do and what a great job they were doing.......Why the hell were they just standing there talking then?......spending all that time, as the article says, patting each other on the back.....

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

^You guys are just clueless aren't you? I invite any of your sorry assess to come down here in Texas and help out with the refugees...untill then SFUP. You dont know the first thing about the efforts that these people have put in to help these folks but you have a comment about everything.

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

Funny thing was, there were 3 students from Duke that came on Aaron Brown newscast the other day. They posed as AP reporters and said that it took them less than 20 mins to go past the checkpoint in their Hyuindai and to the now infamous convention center in NO. They wondered why no one was doing anything to help those people. They said if they could go in and out, so could any relief agency. Or at least direct these people to get the hell out by walking. (They also made home video, reporting a whole bunch of school buses going in the opposite direction to convention center, empty)

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

Kaleem the issue isn’t with how things are going now it’s with how they went.

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

^ Yep its all a big conspiracy to kill those people...Tell me what does that have to do with Bush? When will the *ing local and state govt accept responsibility for inadequate planning for decades and having no emergency plan to evacuate their own citizens. When will Nagin or whatever his name is going to accept that he *ed up by not implementing any real plans to help his citizens. When will Blanco admit that she has no clue what a aleader is all about?

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

No, GW is more a reaganite than GH was. If you recall GH was the relative opposite to Reagan in 1979.

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

please send me a ticket…

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

Kaleem, it is not politically correct to get to reality. The majority of the housing that is sitting underwater were some of the meanest neighborhoods in the country. Huge murder rates, drugs, crime and no way out. So now the place is uninhabitable. Is it a huge leap to think that some of these people may see it as an opportunity to make a change that they otherwise might have never made?

And, for the record, Texas rocks. The hospitality they have shown is spectacular. Let’s just hope that they can find more permanent placements, and that the enthusiasm does not wane.

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

What does this have to do with Bush, are you kidding? FEMA agents warned last year in a published document that due to Bush changing FEMA over so that it would fall under the Homeland Security Departement and removing funds that they wouldn’t be able to respond properly to a major national disaster.

Now read the following and tell me if you understand what primary responsibility means.

"In the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or other large-scale emergency, the Department of Homeland Security will assume primary responsibility on March 1st for ensuring that emergency response professionals are prepared for any situation. "

http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/theme_home2.jsp

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

UTD, NO was not built last year. Local city and state govt. had decades to paln for this inevitable incident. It is very convinient for you to point to the last year actions while completely ignoring decades of inaction. Maybe I should quote on of the liberals for all bush haters to understand "Aks no what your country (city) can do for you, askk what can you do for your country (city)". Do you think the mayor can look at himself in the mirror and tell us that he did all he could have done to help his citizens

Re: The Bush family, they just don’t get it.

Good article:

Plenty of Blame to Go Around
The Feds may have fallen down on funding for levee maintenance, but New Orleans officials could have issued bonds to make up the difference

WEB-EXCLUSIVE COMMENTARY
By Charles Gasparino
Newsweek
Updated: 12:30 p.m. ET Sept. 7, 2005
Sept. 7, 2005 - President Bush, Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff and a host of federal officials deserve much of the intense criticism they’ve been under for failing to leap into action when Hurricane Katrina’s destruction brought on human misery and lawlessness, especially in New Orleans.

But the finger-pointing ignores a massive local failure. Yes, FEMA Director Michael Brown moved painfully slowly. But the flooding that has nearly wiped New Orleans off the map was rooted in years of infrastructure neglect—and now state and local officials also need to be held accountable.

Not long after the levees broke last week and Lake Pontchartrain began flowing into New Orleans, a local businessman phoned me to say that a local agency is supposed to keep up the levees. The Orleans Parish Levee Board, appointed by the mayor and state governor, is supposed to watch out for exactly the weaknesses that brought on the chaos. I was amazed. All the more so when the businessman added that instead the levee board has been busy recently with other matters—investing in local casinos.

New Orleans is known for its inept, and at times corrupt local officials. From the 1950s to the 1970s, Leander Perez ran a notoriously corrupt political machine in Plaquemines Parish. But the charge took me by surprise. So I pulled the following description of the Orleans Parish Levee Board from the local newspaper, The Times-Picayune in 2004:

“Responsible for building and maintaining the flood walls and embankments that make up local flood control networks, the state’s levee boards historically have provided governors with an easy way to reward financial supporters. In New Orleans, there is the added benefit of overseeing a police department and an expansive inventory of real estate that includes an airport, two marinas, a riverboat casino complex, dozens of parcels of commercial property and hundreds of acres of park land along Lake Pontchartrain.”

Then there’s an Associated Press story from earlier in the year, which announced that the "Orleans Parish levee board is dusting off a thick but long-dormant report on a grandiose public works project: a proposal to build a 4-mile-long island on Lake Pontchartrain with beaches, camping areas and possibly hotels, restaurants and an amusement park.

“Just imagine a 4-mile stretch of sandy beaches that doesn’t directly impact traffic, curtails pollutants in the lake and maybe provides tourist attractions like hotels and museums,” Eugene Green, a levee board commissioner, told AP. “That’s something that needs to be explored seriously.”

You get my point. The levee board appears to be doing everything but devoting its time to the maintenance of the levees in recent years—and the city is now paying the price. I wanted to ask Louisiana’s governor, Kathleen Blanco, about the levee board, but a spokesman never got back to me. Mayor Ray Nagin is understandably tied up with more pressing matters, like getting those remaining to leave his city, so I don’t expect he’s going to get on the telephone with me anytime soon either.

The levees, as we’ve all heard, were built to withstand a Category 3 hurricane. Katrina was a Category 4. Congress recently has underfunded the Army Corps of Engineers, the federal agency primarily responsible for building levees on the Mississippi, in spite of the agency’s requests for more money. Former U.S. congressman Bob Livingston, who represented the suburbs surrounding New Orleans for two decades, had his own take on who should get the blame. Livingston told NEWSWEEK that regional rivalries prevented more federal money flowing to the levees in the lower Mississippi. He added that “environmentalists who didn’t want to build levees so we can live like Indians did with the buffalo roaming” also thwarted building bigger and better levees.

State and local governments could have made up the difference by issuing municipal bonds. There’s a simple reason why the federal government gives buyers of bonds issued by state and local governments massive tax breaks (they are free from federal, state and local taxes). The object is to promote the building of infrastructure, like roads, bridges and yes, when the Feds can’t provide all the funding, local levees.

In the coming weeks and months, you’ll be hearing a lot about how municipal bonds will rebuild the infrastructure of New Orleans and the entire area affected by Hurricane Katrina. Just last Friday, NEWSWEEK reported the opening salvo. The state treasurer told a Wall Street rating agency about very tentative plans for a massive municipal bond offering to spur the rebuilding of roads bridges and I presume, better levees. Better late than never.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9232666/site/newsweek/page/2/

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

From the article OG posted for the people who are ready to blame bush for creating and sending Katrina to NO.



**Not long after the levees broke last week and Lake Pontchartrain began flowing into New Orleans, a local businessman phoned me to say that a local agency is supposed to keep up the levees. The Orleans Parish Levee Board, appointed by the mayor and state governor, is supposed to watch out for exactly the weaknesses that brought on the chaos. I was amazed. All the more so when the businessman added that instead the levee board has been busy recently with other matters—investing in local casinos.

New Orleans is known for its inept, and at times corrupt local officials. From the 1950s to the 1970s, Leander Perez ran a notoriously corrupt political machine in Plaquemines Parish. But the charge took me by surprise. So I pulled the following description of the Orleans Parish Levee Board from the local newspaper, The Times-Picayune in 2004:

**

Re: The Bush family, they just don't get it.

Just for the record, I do think that the head of FEMA is an unqualifed idiot. However the actual FEMA crisis mangers are the ones calling the shots, and they are exceptionally talented. As is the case in virtually every government, the head of the organization is offten a politico, whose role is to advocate for the agency, but whose role in day to day management is very little.

The levees were built over decades, including Bill Clinton. Bushs' funding of the Corps of Engineers was 15% more in real dollars than the average expenditure under Clinton EXCEPT for Clintons' last year. In Clintons' last year, he pushed a ton of pork projects through, so that when people say "Bush cut the budget", it is only compared to the last abnormally high Clinton year. And, by the way, the projects that were "cut" by Bush to actually do work on the levees, did not involve the actual levees that broke!

The partisan wails here are a bit misplaced given the facts.