In The Name of Allah, The Most Beneficent, The Most Kind
I am posting this email here because the discussion was stopped by the moderated by force since it was not yet came to an end without any final result. Moderators polices are not very well defined. In this case.
You don’t have right to CLOSE the thread since it was in progress. When you saw that it was going against your personal opinion you stopped it. You think that you have power to do it. This kind of act people were doing since beginning of mankind.
rehman1: don’t post too many messages to dump the real research message of the other person. It causes difficulty to find the chain of messages for other readers. Compile a single message in reply in MS Word and then post it in a single time. If you think that there are some modifications required goto edit and modify instead of posting another message.
Do you think that the religious discussion will never let you into sectarianism? In the beginging few people were discussing that Taraweeh is nafal or sunnat e mouakada. Is this not because of difference of opinions OR these kind of things came out because they belong to different sects.
Ammarr:
Before reading this email, I will urge to read my post once again carefully and answer them logically instead of redirecting the discussion to some other issues. The hadith I have posted I never used it incorrectly. The words of the hadith are quite clear and fairly no explanation is required to understand that. In this thread you are giving me the 2nd logic to disprove my opinion. Before another person gave me another reason.
As I said earlier please read it again.
The following words in the hadith clearly show that these words are NOT about the later Ummah. Please, read it carefully. Think over it again and tell me.
Ammarr: Similarly this hadith does not talk about the Hypocrites at the time of the Holy Prophet (PBUH). Words “My Associates”, “My Companions” clearly shows what you can understand.
Moreover, if you say that this Hadith is about the Hypocrites who were in the companions of the holy Prophet (PBUH) in his life, then we must have right to know them. Who were those? Why they went into hiding after the death of the holy Prophet (PBUH).
About hypocrites there is a complete sura in Quran, there were hypocrites even after the holy prophet, nobody deny that too. But the question is who those were. How to recognize those? Is there any gauge. And what are your responsibilities in their case. Can’t you go towards hell-fire in case of misunderstanding those kinds of people? To make you understand more discussion might require.
There are many other aAdeeth in support of this opinion. However one hadeeth can not be denied. I am not giving you more references. I am ending this here because this is not our fundamental topic in this thread.
The actions and deeds in their lives disprove this that the holy Prophet (PBUH) has never said anything about the personalities which I am mentioning. It is fabricated sometime later after they got power. You must be very careful. Illogical believes need fabrications to build their structure. Otherwise it is not long lasting. However it leaves certain flows in between. But those people who knew they always clarified it.
You never know how many Ahadeedh are opposing your opinion and thoughts, which is reflecting the truth concepts of Islam.
Quran and Ahle Bait (AS) has the most authentic value in islam.
Read the Hadith again and read its last part. And See what Hazrat Umar has said about Taraweeh and how he differentiated it with Tahujjad prayer. What he said proves that Taraweeh is an innovation and it was never prescribed before.
Here is the last part of that hadith for your convenience. Read it and please explain it with the reference.
If you know about sciences of Hadith. Please tell me but not here. We are discussing Taraweeh in this thread, which is a bidah named by its innovator and never prayed by the Holy prophet (PBUH) and in the times of Hazrat Abu Bakar. The Holy Prophet Prayed the Tahujjad Prayer instead. You think that it is Taraweeh. Which is wrong.
Since it was not a Sunnah. It revival does not make any sense. It is called a bidah by Hazrat Umar
For the rest of Ummah, Tahajjud prayer is only Sunnat-e-Mu’akkidah, but not obligatory. And for all the Nawafil and Sunnat-e-Mu’akkidah, Rasool Allah [saww] has clearly said:
Prophet[SAWW] ordered his adherents to offer non-compulsory Prayers at home. Read this Hadees
Why did Umar gather people in the mosque for Jam’at (congregation) to carry out NON COMPULSORY and NON CONGREGATIONAL Prayer? Is it not a clear violation of the orders of Rasool Allah [saww]? Anything that is not in harmony with the principles of religion, constitutes innovation of Dhalalah (misguidance).
Wasalam,