Yamahas question was whether Kashmir can be divided on the basis of religion. The simple answere to that question is no, as there isn't a single district in Kashmir that has a Hindu majority.
Well, there were surely pockets of Hindu majority areas in different parts of kashmir. Just because, they are not in majority in a particular district does not mean that they should not get their homeland.
Kashmiri muslims can always or will have to vacate a district or two for their brothers.
You cannot kick out the indeginous people from their own land/country just coz they are less in number. Kashmiri muslims have history of just few hundred years in Kashmir, whereas pandits have been living there more than thousands of years.
Muslims got their homeland within India, they were not told to go to Iran, Afghanistan, Malaysia. Same way, you cannot force hindus to leave kashmir, that is their homeland/country just coz they are less in number.
Kashmir and kashmiris needs to be treated just like undivided India.
Plus, muslims in Kashmir are doing great job by erasing hindu history from kashmir. They have renamed Anantnag as Islamabad, Shankaracharya hill has been renamed as Takht e sulaiman. And the shor sharaba they created during Amarnath shrine was too much. All what hindus wanted to lease the govt. land for 4 months, and they did not allow that as well.
I guess common man was right - there is no point showing the truth to people like you whose only achievement in life is to vent anger over your failures. coward and sissy army? and you guys lost to that army how many times?
Well, there were surely pockets of Hindu majority areas in different parts of kashmir. Just because, they are not in majority in a particular district does not mean that they should not get their homeland.
Kashmiri muslims can always or will have to vacate a district or two for their brothers.
You cannot kick out the indeginous people from their own land/country just coz they are less in number. Kashmiri muslims have history of just few hundred years in Kashmir, whereas pandits have been living there more than thousands of years.
Muslims got their homeland within India, they were not told to go to Iran, Afghanistan, Malaysia. Same way, you cannot force hindus to leave kashmir, that is their homeland/country just coz they are less in number.
Kashmir and kashmiris needs to be treated just like undivided India.
Plus, muslims in Kashmir are doing great job by erasing hindu history from kashmir. They have renamed Anantnag as Islamabad, Shankaracharya hill has been renamed as Takht e sulaiman. And the shor sharaba they created during Amarnath shrine was too much. All what hindus wanted to lease the govt. land for 4 months, and they did not allow that as well.
Are you saying that Kashmiris Muslims are not indigenous. Where's your evidence for that. Their most common surname is Bhatt or Butt, which indicates Sarsut Brahmin ancestry. Other surnames include Lone, from Loniya meaning salt merchants, Wyne from Vania or Bania. I don't see any Iranian or Malaysians in Kashmir. There are a small number of Kashmiris of Afghan ancestry, but most Kashmiri Muslims are just as indigenous as Hindus. And why should they vacate land where they have lived for thousands of years to make way for your Panun Kashmir.
Stop believing this RSS propaganda about Muslims having come straight from Dubai on an Emirates flight.
This is perhaps the basic mistake that every Pakistani makes ... the dispute is not over Kashmir ..... it is over the princely state of Jammu & Kashmir and that needs to be resolved.
I accept the dispute is over Jammu and Kashmir. But Yamaha's question was about the Kashmir valley. The Pundits have never been more 5% of the valley's population, and they were non-existent in Uri and Baramula. They were mainly an urban community, 1/3 were in Srinagar. So where is he going to create this Panun Kashmir.
Will also give the right to return to the Jat and Rajput Muslims of eastern Jammu as well then, who were expelled in 1948.
Are you saying that Kashmiris Muslims are not indigenous. Where's your evidence for that. Their most common surname is Bhatt or Butt, which indicates Sarsut Brahmin ancestry. Other surnames include Lone, from Loniya meaning salt merchants, Wyne from Vania or Bania. I don't see any Iranian or Malaysians in Kashmir. There are a small number of Kashmiris of Afghan ancestry, but most Kashmiri Muslims are just as indigenous as Hindus. And why should they vacate land where they have lived for thousands of years to make way for your Panun Kashmir.
Stop believing this RSS propaganda about Muslims having come straight from Dubai on an Emirates flight.
I absolutely did not say, Kashmiri muslims are very much indeginous. They are very much the sons of the same soil as are the Kashmiri hindus.
And, Why should not they vacate the land for kashmiri hindus??? They have no right to kick out Kashmiri hindus out of their homes ie kashmir.
I dont care about RSS. This is not RSS propaganda, according to RSS, kashmiri muslims should go to pakistan.
I accept the dispute is over Jammu and Kashmir. But Yamaha's question was about the Kashmir valley. The Pundits have never been more 5% of the valley's population, and they were non-existent in Uri and Baramula. They were mainly an urban community, 1/3 were in Srinagar. So where is he going to create this Panun Kashmir.
Will also give the right to return to the Jat and Rajput Muslims of eastern Jammu as well then, who were expelled in 1948.
Sure bring it up … you had a hard time beliveing that Pakistan had to vacate as per UNCIP resolutions and kept on saying UNCIP resolutions are not “binding” …
I absolutely did not say, Kashmiri muslims are very much indeginous. They are very much the sons of the same soil as are the Kashmiri hindus.
And, Why should not they vacate the land for kashmiri hindus??? They have no right to kick out Kashmiri hindus out of their homes ie kashmir.
I dont care about RSS. This is not RSS propaganda, according to RSS. kashmiri muslims should go to pakistan.
Stop talking nonsense because what you are saying is only your fantasy and is not based on true facts. Do believe what you wanna believe but do not present it as facts.
Why should kashmiri muslims go to Pakistan. Let hindu kashmiri's go to Kashmir if they want.
But they can stay in Kashmir no one is kicking them out.
Stop talking nonsense because what you are saying is only your fantasy and is not based on true facts. Do believe what you wanna believe but do not present it as facts.
Why should kashmiri muslims go to Pakistan. Let hindu kashmiri's go to Kashmir if they want.
But they can stay in Kashmir no one is kicking them out.
Dear Happy heart,
Please read my post carefully, I did not say Kashmiri muslims should go to pakistan.
please specify, what are the points that you differ on?
But they can stay in Kashmir no one is kicking them out.
if you believe that is true, then you should believe that hindus did not demolish Babri masjid as well. Hindus did it but keep in denying it, same way kashmiri muslims kicked out kashmiri hindus, but keep on denying it.
if you believe that is true, then you should believe that hindus did not demolish Babri masjid as well. Hindus did it but keep in denying it, same way kashmiri muslims kicked out kashmiri hindus, but keep on denying it.
Well i think your very judgmental and presumtious fellow :)
i SAID no one will kick them out
talk to any kashmir organisation and they will tell you the SAME.
But you shut up totally about GRAVE humanrights situation of Muslim Kashmiri's and
massgraves of Muslims kashmiri'sthat are found in Indian occupied Kashmir
how come?
you are hindu pandit? so anyone else suffering means nothing to you?
will it kill you to talk about gravehuman rights violations committed by your sissy indian army"?
be man (or woman lolz) and have guts to talk against human rights abuses of Muslim Kashmirs
but i doubt you have the guts
only thing you talk about is hindu kashmiris the rest can to go hell.
Well i think your very judgmental and presumtious fellow :)
i SAID no one will kick them out
talk to any kashmir organisation and they will tell you the SAME.
But you shut up totally about GRAVE humanrights situation of Muslim Kashmiri's and
massgraves of Muslims kashmiri'sthat are found in Indian occupied Kashmir
how come?
you are hindu pandit? so anyone else suffering means nothing to you?
will it kill you to talk about gravehuman rights violations committed by your sissy indian army"?
be man (or woman lolz) and have guts to talk against human rights abuses of Muslim Kashmirs
but i doubt you have the guts
only thing you talk about is hindu kashmiris the rest can to go hell.
I'm not judgemental or taking sides. I'm not anti muslim nor i'm anti hindu.
Trust me, Kashmir hindus feel exactly how gujrati muslims feel.
I'm not here to shed tears for hindus or for muslims.
I'm know, how the Indian army was given free hand by the govt. to crush the armed revolt in the early nineties.
Thats the same reason, this thread was opened, how to solve this problem. That is division of kashmir for all kashmiris.
India’s stand on Kashmir is very clear … Jammu & Kashmir is part of India !!! It is Pakistan that swears by UN resolutions and hypocritcally it is the one that has taken no step for demilitirization … the very foundation of holding a plebiscite. So next time you raise the UN resolution ask yourself this … why isn’t the Pakistan government vacating the areas that are under its control as it required in UNCIP resolutions.
Perhaps you did not know this but even the kashmiri’s want UNCIP resolutions to be implemented … and you know what it says there .. Pakistan army has to COMPLETELY vacate the areas it is occupying in Jammu & Kashmir
The people who will question or condemn the creation of Panun Kashmir will be indirectly condemning the creation of Pakistan because pakistan was created on similar ground, a homeland for muslims of India
Your argument doesn't make any sense as the two situations are not analogous.
Pakistan was created from contiguous Muslim majority districts in Northwestern and Eastern British India. Hindu/Sikh majority districts were not vacated to make way for it. Also while Pakistan was created as a Muslim homeland of sorts, it clearly was not created for all the Muslims of the Subcontinent - in fact, with the exception of refugees fleeing East Punjab and Muslim League officials, immigration into Pakistan was strongly discouraged. Jinnah actively encouraged Muslims left behind in India to stay put and claim their rights as Indian citizens.
On the other hand, Kashmir is an ethnonationalist issue (where almost all people of this ethnicity happen to be Muslim), rather than a religious one. Also, as others have already pointed out, there isn't a single tehsil, let alone an actual district, in the Kashmir Valley that isnt over 90% Muslim. Even before the Pandits left, their population was highest in Srinagar - and even there, they didn't account for more than 10% or 12% of the population. Creating a Panun Kashmir would literally require ethnically cleansing over 90% of the population of any given area in the Kashmir Valley. Moreover, even if we ignore that fact, you also have to realize that according to the 1981 census - well before any migration had occured - Hindus accounted for only 4% of the population of the Kashmir Valley. Logically, they would only be entitled to 4% of the Valley's land - 600 sq kms, which means that this ethically cleansed Hindu state would be 1/6 of the size of Goa. It doesn't make much sense when a). actual Kashmiri Pandits should have every right to settle in any Kashmiri state, and b). should they opt to leave Kashmir, there's no dearth of Hindu majority areas in Jammu.
there is no question or need for dividing Kashmir, whether from India or within. Certainly not based on any desires from Pakistanis - it is well known fact that Pakistanis covet Kashmir and have failed in all attempts over the past 60+ years. The only thing that has resulted from their attempts is killing of innocent people on both sides of the border and strengthening of the terrorist monster that is consuming Pakistan from inside.
PS: CM, why are you so enamored by what miliband or anyone else says? you guys don't like the west but can't get enough of them! is miliband your gora master?