Nice try at dodging a claim you cant substantiate. Though its still a new topic theres plenty of documentation in there as to which parties supported the ban, and what their stated stances were. None of them focused on architectural style as the principal issue.
So lets see you defend your stance without deflecting the issue as in the next few sentences Im quoting…
Why is that relevant?
No, its not.
Who claimed that there is a holocaust of Muslims happening in Switzerland? Complete strawman argument, you set up a fictional adversary and knock him down.
The decision merits criticism and is getting the appropriate amount of criticism here.