Suicide bombers surrender

Iraqis Sent on Suicide Mission Surrender
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

Filed at 3:37 p.m. ET

UMM QASR, Iraq (AP) – Two Iraqi soldiers who said they were sent on a suicide attack mission to the country’s largest port have turned themselves in to British troops, the British commander said Tuesday.

We had two suicide bombers turn themselves in yesterday because they didn't want to be suicide bombers any more,'' Col. Steve Cox, commander of the Royal Marine Commandos running Umm Qasr, told reporters. We are accommodating them.‘’

The pair had no explosives in their possession when they surrendered, Cox said, adding that they were turned over to British military intelligence for interrogation and would be treated as enemy prisoners of war. He did not give any details about the alleged plans for a suicide attack.

Coalition forces have been on heightened alert for suicide attackers since one posing as a taxi driver detonated a bomb that killed four U.S. Army soldiers Saturday at a checkpoint farther north.

Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan pledged more suicide attacks would follow and called Saturday’s ``just the beginning.‘’ Iraq has said thousands of Arab volunteers ready for martyrdom have come to Iraq since the start of the war.

Umm Qasr is one of the few fully pacified towns inside Iraq and is vital to supplying the rest of the country with humanitarian aid because it is the only large seaport.

A U.N. security team was in the city Tuesday to determine whether it is safe enough for humanitarian workers to return.

``We’re all waiting for their report to give a clearances to the effect that the environment would permit humanitarian workers back,‘’ said John Negroponte, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations.

Local Iraqis are increasingly informing British sources of the whereabouts of officials from Saddam Hussein’s ruling Baath Party, Cox said.

Thirty-five party officials are in custody, and three to four more remain at large, Cox said.

The town of 30,000 people was plagued by pockets of resistance until several days ago, but is now safe enough for troops and ordinary civilians to walk around at night, Cox said. He added that there has been no recent guerrilla activity.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/international/AP-War-Iraq-Suicide-Attackers.html

** the strategy of open disclosure at check points is paying dividends already. Brave muj…yah!***

Things like these are bound to happen, some will surrender some will die by friendly fire, especially if they are British soldiers coming in the way of the trigger happy terorists from America.

Who would want to die for Saddam?

Who would want to die for Bush?

No one wants to die for Saddam but then no one wants to live under the rule of invaders and terorists from abroad. There is a difference between dying for Saddam and dying for your country. The Iraqis are dying for the latter. They dont want haliiburton getting all the oil which belongs to them. Iraqis are proud people and will not be subjucated by a few gun toting trigger happy bull ****ters from America.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
Who would want to die for Bush?
[/QUOTE]
Apparently 100,000+ troops would.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *
Who would want to die for Bush?
[/QUOTE]

That's the great thing about our military. We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. Things that are much more powerful than loyalty for one man.

^ I didn't know that Brit troops and Iraqi women and children were a threat to your way of life.....

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *

That's the great thing about our military. We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. Things that are much more powerful than loyalty for one man.
[/QUOTE]

what are u a local jar head recruiter ? spare us this crap about you being concious about "preserving" your fundamentals. I think most of us here are very familiar exactly how much of the basic laws that US was founded on are intact today.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *

That's the great thing about our military. We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. Things that are much more powerful than loyalty for one man.
[/QUOTE]

True. And President of the United States is the Commander In Chief of the Armed Forces as well. And soldires in the front lines follow the orders thru the chain of command. Im not sure how many US soldiers know that the president is trying "liberate" the people of Iraq from a cruel dictator the government supported, even armed, during decades of war crimes and human rights abuses.
The Iraqi people dont have B-52s, cruise missile, thousands of bombs, heck I havent even seen a single iraqi fighter jet. So they revert to guerilla tactics to preseve their sovereignty, security and freedom.
US has a long history of covert actions, political assassinations, special ops, anti-democratic coups and dirty tricks that are, even today, being used in Iraq. As long as the ends justify the means right?

+++So they revert to guerilla tactics to preseve their sovereignty, security and freedom.+++

Wrong. May be soverignty of Saddam Hussein and his Baath party thugs but not security and freedom. Iraqi individuals will be more secure and free once this regime falls. You can be against the war and still agree on that.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. Things that are much more powerful than loyalty for one man.
[/QUOTE]

MyVoice, Several Iraqis, and Arabs, who are fighting against American/British troops are not doing so out of any great love for Saddam Hussein. The will of the Shi'ites in southern Iraq to attempt to hold out against the US invasion have proven this. Your statement regarding the "preservation of a 200 year old way of life" was interesting - because these Iraqis (and other Arabs), too, fight for a way of life that is far, far older than two centuries. They fight for their land, they fight for the Tigris and the Euphrates and the civilizations that used to thrive alongside these historical rivers. A history that stretches back thousands of years. Saddam is but one small, if pathetic, character in this maneuvre - they fight not for one man, but for their land and their freedom. Quite a difference there.
i have no doubts the US will, eventually, "win" the invasion via its superior aerial power. You will succeed at bombing a country to occupy their land, but you will never succeed at bombing people to win their trust.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *

That's the great thing about our military. We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. Things that are much more powerful than loyalty for one man.
[/QUOTE]

Now this I have to say is the biggest bunch of stench pile i have seen in a long time. Do you really believe that US always fights for your freedom and security? Do you really believe that Saddam was/is a threat to US and your way of life?

Please enlighten us with your way of life? Is it killing innocent civilians and then telling the world that we are there to liberate them? Is it imposing economic sanctions on a war ravaged country? I can go on myvoice, I will give you a chance to explain yourself. In the meantime when you go to a bookstore next time, pick up a copy of "Iraq: In the eye of storm" from Dilip Hiro. You might begin to understand what really motivates war hawks like Rummy, Cheney and others.

Kaleem

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Apparently 100,000+ troops would.
[/QUOTE]

100,000 + brainwashed troops have no choice.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fret Wizard: *

100,000 + brainwashed troops have no choice.
[/QUOTE]

unlike the poor iraqis troops who are like sitting ducks in trenches.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Imdad Ali: *
Apparently 100,000+ troops would.
[/QUOTE]

Those 100,000+ troops would rather die for the money than bush!

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Yogi: *

unlike the poor iraqis troops who are like sitting ducks in trenches.
[/QUOTE]

This is why US is feeling hard resistance in most areas.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by mufakkar: *
...I didn't know that Brit troops and Iraqi women and children were a threat to your way of life..
[/QUOTE]

:)

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by myvoice: *
...We don't fight for one man or to preserve one man's power. We fight for a cause and the preservation of a 200 year old way of life, our freedom and our security. ...
[/QUOTE]

Didn't you forget to mention the economy?

Re: Suicide bombers surrender

Suicide attack without explosives? :eek: