Spreading HATE ...

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chaltahai: * In my interpretation of what god would want, he would want me to be tolerant and care for the other person regardless whether they wer jewish, muslim, homosexual or all three in one. In the end he made them who they are so who am I to judge.
[/QUOTE]

Chaltahai, the above quote perfectly summarises the way I feel, but going against the fundamental issues of Islam would make me a non-muslim, wouldn't it? I've never felt so effing confused in my whole life.

Sadi:Why should that bother you so much. SOme of the problems arise from having a sheltered life and not much interaction on the social level for some of these folks. There are hindus like that also. I think you are lucky that you have an open mind and understand that the message from islam is more about compassion than limitation on compassion towards one particular type of person.

It's not as straightforward as that though, is it? Your religion is a part of you - it makes you who you are. It's amazing how small little things from your religion can influence your life to such an extent. I can't just wake up and say, 'Right, what I've been practicing for the last 23 years is a load of crap - let me go and get totally pissed now'. It's not that easy.

Sadi: religion is ofcourse is part of you. No one disputing that. My point is that what do you use religion for or better, what is it there for. Is it there for me to judge those who I don;t think are as pious as me or to let them be? And the converse is true can be asked as well. I think that if one is comfortable in their own skin then such dilemmas are grauitous. Just because a so called supposedly pious person can come along and point to scripture and say that god wants you to not offer duas to jews or homosexuals are bad people, should that make you feel a less of a religious person? It is that person's shortcomings, in my view, that are mistaking god's word. Not your current interpretation.

Islam looks at homosexuality as something contradictory to the very nature according to which God created man. God’s creation is generally in pairs. A complete phenomenon is generally divided into two complementary parts. Human being, as a complete entity is divided into males and females. The mental, emotional and physical completion of humans is generally achieved through the combination of a male and a female. Homosexuality is based on a refutation of this obvious fact, and is, therefore, in contradiction with the very nature on which man has been created. Islam does not support anything that is, in anyway, contrary to the nature on which God created man. Therefore, purely from an intellectual perspective, it can be said that homosexuality is not a religious prohibition, as far as Islam is concerned, but rather a natural prohibition. And natural prohibitions are of an equal, if not of more importance as compared to religious prohibitions. To understand the two kinds of prohibitions more thoroughly, consider the example of sexual relations between men and women. Sexual relation between a man and a woman is the way nature has meant it to be. Now, Islam has restricted the allowance of this relation between a man and a woman to only after Nika’h. Thus, the prohibition of sexual relation outside Nika’h is a religious prohibition based on the nature of man, but not a natural prohibition.

The Learner

Read More On Islam’s position about the concerned topic:

Is it a genetic issue?

No Sadi Sobi, I didnot forget that women are also gays. If men are gays the women left will have no way to fulfil their needs which will lead to zina. The women will either become public property and further increase the evils or they might become gays which is again against nature.

Another thing is that due to gays the generation doesn't continue. There are no children. So the parents of the gays will get hurt becuase they won't have grandchildren. The family won't continue.

How is what I said contradicting to what Khan Sahib said.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Beatle_ki_wapsi: *
Islam looks at homosexuality as something contradictory to the very nature according to which God created man. God's creation is generally in pairs. A complete phenomenon is generally divided into two complementary parts. Human being, as a complete entity is divided into males and females. The mental, emotional and physical completion of humans is generally achieved through the combination of a male and a female. Homosexuality is based on a refutation of this obvious fact, and is, therefore, in contradiction with the very nature on which man has been created.

[/QUOTE]

I am not educated enough to know why Islam prohibts homosexuality.
However, in the light of what is now known physiologically and biologically, it is clear that not all men are "equivalent" to some generic "man", and neither are women the same. Instead of viewing the sexes as two, it might be more accurate to view them as two overlapping distributions, where some women show more "manly" characteristics than a lot of men and some men might be more effeminate than a lot of women. Then there are now known cases where multiple fertilized eggs fuse very early in the womb to form a single individual instead of being born as twins. These individuals do show multiple "dna" characteristics and can and do exhibit male and female characteristics at the cellular level.
Homosexuality exists among all sorts of animals and can be redily observed and documented. If we accept the theory of evolution, then it is not surprising that humans exhibit it also. Then homosexuality has been with man since the time man has been able to record his history. So there is very little evidence that homosexuality is unnatural, but on the contrary there seems to be a lot of evidence that it is part and parcel of natural biology.

Please keep in my that I do distinguish between heterosexual individuals who indulge in homosexual sex, and homosexuals who feel a psychological attraction to someone of their own sex and might prefer to lead a celibate life.

thats true my friend

***I can’t bring myself to spread hate and ill feeling. * **

Islam doesn’t require that of us. Islam teaches understanding and tolerance.

It shows us what is right and what is wrong, but it leaves the choice with us. Allah swt has blessed us with a sense of intellect and a sense of conscience, so that we may understand what He requires of us, and He, also, in His infinite wisdom, has blessed us with the freedom to make our own decisions, for which we will be made to bear the consequences.

Now, us lowly mortals do not have the capability to look into the hearts of the people next to us, we cannot know their true intentions, we have no way to truly judge them, moreover we have no right to judge them.

Allah swt has blessed each and every one of us with the right to make our own decisions, and believe what it is we wish to believe, and we have to respect that right. I’m not saying we have to respect what it is other’s believe/decide, but we do have to respect their right to do so. Now there are things that are clearly wrong in Islam, and the ways of dealing with them are set out for us. Whether it be adultlery, theft, whatever. A really beautiful hadith comes to mind, I dont know, some might take it the wrong way, but i’ll post it here for you, because I think it’ll you out a little:

(Continued in next post)

***Is it wrong for me to say dua for a Jewish mother who’s just lost her only son to a suicide bomber? Is it wrong for me to wish for peace in the Middle East, not just for Muslims, but also for Jews? Is it wrong for me not to look away in disgust at a gay couple walking hand in hand in the park? ***

No, I don’t think any of those are wrong. But I’m speaking from whats in my heart, my personal opinions I guess you could say.

I believe that Islam doesn’t teach us hatred, I don’t believe Islam teaches us ridicule and I don’t believe Islam teaches us to be prideful.

I believe Islam teaches us love, compassion, understanding, humility and above all humanity.

I’m (again :o ) going to quote something I posted long ago, because I think it ties in with what Sadi Sobi is getting at,

I hope that helps you out somewhat, inshaAllah, i’m sorry, I know its really scattered, I wish I had time to do a better job of it.

Fee AmaanAllah
GfQ

Hizb ul Tahrir -> Doing an excellent job in spreading hatred... A few days back an Urdu daily reported their members in Pakistan of cutting cables, heh...

Sadi Sobi

“tauba tauba astaghfirullah astaghfirullah” :mocking: I didn’t say those words but these are words from the Quran. You wouldn’t ask this question if you had read the very basic methodology of Jihad where there is no place for collateral damage or stuff like that. You can’t kill kids, women, old people and not even cut a tree without any valid reason in Jihad so the question of mourning a death of a kid killed in suicide bombing wouldn’t arise.

As far as gays are concerned I know that their practices are wrong but it doesn’t mean that one shouldn’t make friends with them because of their origin. It could be possible that one day they might leave that practice because of your friendship. I myself just find it difficult to do that for being a guy.

Also, Axiom is a different person and he has got every right to say whatever he wants to say. innit? I stand by my words as I don’t think they contradicts any Islamic teachings. :slight_smile:

PS. my english is weak so i don’t know what you are talking about your brother being late due to u being in front of the room :confused:

Old Lahori your reply doesn’t answer Sobi’s question anymore than the assertion that 99% of the 300 000 human genes are similar to that of a rat and 5% or more are identical or that 65 to 85% of our genes are the same as wood makes you a rat or as thick as a plank (of course, I’m not asserting in anyway that you are - its just a crude example).

The biggest lie promoted by Stonewall and the rest of the “Gay Mafia” is that homosexuality is purely due to genetics and thus we are pre-destined to “be what we are”. If indeed people are programmed to act in a certain way, then the mention of subsequent punishment for committing a homosexual act doesn’t make any sense. Someone like Winona can get off scott free if she pleads guilty to having a “criminal gene”? Homosexuality is a choice. Albeit a wrong choice - I’m not going to err and ahm and make excuses for my belief and give diluted responses (like everyone else really into this neo liberal pc thing everyone is hooked on). What really gets me is the promotion of gay life (Ha! yea rite) as an alternative lifestyle - thats an infringement on my right to not view it as such. What people do behind closed doors is frankly non of my business and neither do I care to know, but for someone to shout, “hey serve me first, I’m gay” whilst standing in a qeue at the Tesco checkout, is not something I or other people would look favourably upon and that is what happening but on a much larger scale. Its a fad and so fashionable to be gay these days its fast become a cliche.

Islam prohibits it maybe due to health reasons but more appropriately for social order and harmony. Your point about evolution is defunct: the two fundamental concepts for evolution are survival and selectiveness for ensuring the propagation of a species. Nothing is more of an anti-thesis to this than homosexuality. There argument that this character has been a part of human behaviour since the dawn of civilisation is not worth the pixels it is written with; if you try a little harder you may again come up with other undesirable characteristics that have been with us since the time Adam and Eve got together. But those characteristics haven’t become any less undesirable.

As for everything else, GfQ has been spot on as usual. :k:

Sobi, I don’t think it is wrong to pray and hope for peace and all that (espescially for the innocent) but to not diffrentiate between the oppressor and the opressed is in itself a tyranny of sorts.

I guess I better stop before Roman clucks angrily “Ooh, get her!” and the rest of the gang stomp their feet in unison screaming “you go girl!” at him…

Khairun Nisa: I agree with practically all of what you have written. As I said earlier there is no homosexuality gene so far. As far as "choice" is concerned we know little about how humans makes choices to say whether the "choice" to be homosexual is akin to the choice people make when they prefer vanilla to strawberry or not. I was merely saying that atleast to me it seems that there are some who struggle with that "choice" a lot, and in the end they seem to have little 'choice' in their preference. That suggests that perhaps we ought not to rush to judgement just yet. I would hate to see people being strung up or thrown off cliffs for their sexual preferences, and I don't like heterosexuals or homosexuals who have a chip on their shoulder and every opportunity has to used to make a point anymore than you seem to.
Comparing distributions of genes between species to distributions of behavior within a single species is a tad unfair, but I think I understand the thrust of your argument. I guess another example would be that for the longest time people kept insisting that cigerette smoking was a personal choice, but now we know that now except for about 10% of the population once addicted smoking goes beyond a choice. Changes in brain chemistry and structure are evident to make the addiction beyond personal 'choice'. Homosexuality is just not that well understood yet to make definitive claims about it one way or the other.

As far as it being with us since a long time is undeniable. Now throwing it away on a "pixel" is a choice. Again people who are born with six digits, or a cleft lip, or with a birth mark on their faces, etc are facts that have lost the passion and ire that they used to invoke among people as signs of evil. We should merely acknowledge what we don't know, and we really do not know what 'drives' homosexuality within biological species. There are homosexual sheep and mice, and I am sure that they are happy to know that there are some to would ascribe to them the ability to make personal choices.

Homosexuality is not a ‘choice’, but a predetermined ‘orientation’. Just as heterosexuality, or bisexuality or trans-sexuality, and all the other sexualitites (it has been proven that it is not due to genes (or a genetic pool) either). No one is capable of choosing one’s sexual orientation. It just is there like the set of hair you are born with. Some curly, some straight, some none, and some blond and orange and gray and red.

The homosexuality issue is a human rights issue (because this orientation is viewed with disgust by all major religions and cultures). Homosexuals are not asking for preferential treatment, nor are they forcing anyone to accept them, all they want are to be treated with respect and dignity like everyone else.

KN. Adam and Eve is a hoax. There was no such thing. There were multiple sets of Adam and Eve that evolved in different places. We were all monkeys and chimps before we were humans (or homosapians as they call us).. a million years from today, homosapians will look nothing like we look today. Check out Lucy at the Museum of Natural History in New York.

I agree with Khair. Homosexuality is a choice, and the genetic makeup argument is mostly a myth.

I look at the argument this way - if someone close to me became homosexual, would I be able to tolerate it? If yes, so be it. If no, so be it. The choices I make, determine the practice of my religion. It's all personal, no one needs to sit in judgement here.

And I don't care what others say, about not praying for others or blah blah. Whatever prayers I do, they die on my lips anyway, the whole world doesn't hear about them or need to. If God has a problem with it, He can take it up with me when the Promised Time comes.. if it does. Coz by then, it'll be pretty certain about His existence eh? Until that time, since I do exist and I know I do, might as well make use of that certainty atleast, even if a dua is just another means of helplessly consoling yourself after-the-fact.

Anyway, coming down to it, I have only this to say: God made everyone for a reason. We have to accept it and live with it.

Ana, fair enough. You keep the issue personal and do not thrust it down anyone's gullet.

The thing that amazes me though about the consequences in a countries like Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, etc. is that the punishment for adultry or assumed adultry is about as severe as that for homosexuality. However, in practical implementations, there are heck a lot of more "honor killings" from even suspicion of adultry than for homosexual behavior, which is by all accounts far more pervasive than in many other places. I wonder why?

Because honor killings involve *women * - i.e. chattel.

And homosexuals in our nations are typically mostly males.

For those who remember the trial of the gays in Egypt recently might enjoy reading the following translation. It more or less encapsulates egyptian attitudes as opposed to the british or to those in some parts of US.


Egyptian Press: ‘Since Egyptian Gays Have No Rights, Their Rights Need No Defense’

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by NYAhmadi: *

Adam and Eve is a hoax. There was no such thing. There were multiple sets of Adam and Eve that evolved in different places. We were all monkeys and chimps before we were humans (or homosapians as they call us).. a million years from today, homosapians will look nothing like we look today. Check out Lucy at the Museum of Natural History in New York.
[/QUOTE]

I am glad u didn't conclude that There were Adam and Steve in the first place.