some questions regarding Abu Bakr thread

Re: some questions regarding Abu Bakr thread

Peace chacha_Ghalib

Thank you for your definition with which I totally agree. Words do have a context however, the original discussion started with PyariCgudia making a statement and then she was chastised for it, by sister Lusi. The manner it was intended was however according to your 'rarely used ’ basis, if it wasn’t then the discussion I had with sister Lusi would have uncovered that. Please read through our discussion again and see again that if the term infallible was being used to mean merely ‘trustworthy’ then the reaction that was given against sister PyariCgudia’s post is reduced to nothing. It can only have been meant with zeal, the only meaning extractable from it would be that prophet Muhammad (SAW) is being seen as totally faultless. It was this that I disputed to and if I was wrong in my assertion then sister Lusi would have clarified that she meant such and such, so your dictionary search has been a useful education but of no real relevance to our discourse.